| Literature DB >> 29614121 |
Hongbo Liu1,2, Binghua Zhu1,2, Shaofu Qiu2, Yidan Xia3, Beibei Liang1,2, Chaojie Yang2, Nian Dong1,2, Yongrui Li2, Ying Xiang1,2, Shan Wang1,2, Jing Xie2, Muti Mahe3, Yansong Sun1, Hongbin Song2.
Abstract
Shigella represents one of the major diarrhea-inducing pathogens threatening public health, but its prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous region, China, remains unclear. We conducted comprehensive investigation of Shigella serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance pattern in Xinjiang, identifying 458 Shigella isolates between 2008 to 2014. Shigella flexneri was identified as predominant species, and several S. flexneri serotypes were isolated, including atypical serotypes 1c, 2c, and 4s. Dominant S. flexneri serotypes were 2a, 1b, 2b, and Xv, different from those generally dominant in China. A hybrid serotype pattern was observed, which included the major Chinese serotypes (2a, Xv) and those predominant in Pakistan (1b, 2b). Shigella sonnei was shown to have a lower frequency compared with that generally observed in China, but an increasing trend of infections associated with this pathogen was observed. Furthermore, a high frequency of drug resistance and different Shigella antimicrobial resistance patterns were demonstrated as well, including very severe resistance phenotypes, such as multidrug resistance and resistance to frontline antibiotics. Seventy-five cephalosporin-resistant Shigella isolates were frequently identified with the resistance determinants that can undergo horizontal transfer, such as blaOXA, blaTEM, blaCTX-M, and integrons, facilitating the development of cephalosporin resistance among Shigella subtypes. Additionally, genetic analyses demonstrated that all 86 quinolone-resistant S. flexneri isolates possess 3-4 mutation sites in quinolone resistance-determining regions, primarily contributing to their resistance to quinolone. However, S. sonnei isolates were not shown to be quinolone resistant. Co-resistance to cephalosporins and quinolones was detected in 17 S. flexneri isolates, and these isolates were additionally multidrug resistant and carried β-lactamase genes and quinolone-resistance determinants. As is demonstrated in this study, dominant serotypes of Shigella were distributed in unique trend with dangerous drug resistance patterns. Novel strategies are urgently required to prevent the development of drug resistance among diarrhea-inducing pathogens.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29614121 PMCID: PMC5882154 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195259
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The prevalence of Shigella in Xinjiang between 2008 and 2014.
| Species/ serotype | Number (%) of isolates | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | Total | |
| 14 (93.3%) | 43 (93.5%) | 28 (93.3%) | 34 (82.9%) | 75 (82.4%) | 109 (72.7%) | 62 (72.9%) | 365 (79.7%) | |
| 1a | 0 | 0 | 2 (6.7%) | 1 (2.4%) | 3 (3.3%) | 5 (3.3%) | 1 (1.2%) | 12 (2.6%) |
| 1b | 3 (2) | 3 (6.5%) | 7 (23.3%) | 7 (17.1%) | 6 (6.6%) | 13 (8.7%) | 8 (9.4%) | 47 (10.3%) |
| 1c | 0 | 1 (2.2%) | 2 (6.7%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (0.7%) |
| 2a | 5 (33.3%) | 26 (56.5%) | 6 (20%) | 15 (36.6%) | 22 (24.2%) | 37 (24.7%) | 23 (27.1%) | 134 (29.3%) |
| 2b | 2 (13.3%) | 4 (8.7%) | 5 (16.7%) | 7 (17.1%) | 8 (8.8%) | 15 (10%) | 5 (5.9%) | 46 (10.0%) |
| 2c | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.4%) | 1 (1.1%) | 2 (1.3%) | 0 | 4 (0.9%) |
| 3a | 1 (6.7%) | 1 (2.2%) | 0 | 2 (4.9%) | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.2%) | 5 (1.1%) |
| 3b | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (0.7%) | 1 (1.2%) | 3 (0.7%) |
| 4a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.1%) | 2 (1.3%) | 2 (2.4%) | 5 (1.1%) |
| 4b | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (1.3%) | 0 | 2 (0.4%) |
| Xv | 2 (13.3%) | 0 | 2 (6.7%) | 1 (2.4%) | 13 (14.3%) | 9 (6.0%) | 9 (10.6%) | 36 (7.9%) |
| 4s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 (4.7%) | 0 | 7 (1.5%) |
| 6 | 0 | 1 (2.2%) | 1 (3.3%) | 0 | 3 (3.3%) | 7 (4.7%) | 5 (5.9%) | 17 (3.7%) |
| x | 1 (6.7%) | 1 (2.2%) | 1 (3.3%) | 0 | 4 (4.4%) | 6 (4.0%) | 2 (2.4%) | 15 (3.3%) |
| y | 0 | 1 (2.2%) | 0 | 0 | 5 (5.5%) | 1 (0.7%) | 1 (1.2%) | 8 (1.7%) |
| Untypable | 0 | 5 (10.9%) | 2 (6.7%) | 0 | 8 (8.8%) | 2 (1.3%) | 4 (4.7%) | 21 (4.6%) |
| 12 (80.0%) | 33 (71.7%) | 20 (66.7%) | 30 (73.2%) | 49 (53.8%) | 74 (49.3%) | 45 (52.9%) | 263 (57.4%) | |
| 1 (6.7%) | 3 (6.5%) | 2 (6.7%) | 7 (17.1%) | 16 (17.6%) | 41 (27.3%) | 23 (27.1%) | 93 (20.3%) | |
| 13 (86.7%) | 36 (78.3%) | 22 (73.3%) | 37 (90.2%) | 65 (71.4%) | 115 (76.7%) | 68 (80.0%) | 356 (77.7%) | |
Fig 1S. flexneri serotype distribution.
Our analyses showed that 2a serotype was the most frequent among 19 identified serotypes. Serotype 2a, 2b, 1b, Xv represent the dominant serotypes, while others were rarely detected.
Fig 2Trends in Shigella prevalence in isolates collected in Xinjiang between 2008 and 2014.
Variations in the frequencies of S. flexneri and S. sonnei with time are presented. In each column, frequencies of S. flexneri and S. sonnei are shown.
Antimicrobial resistance of Shigella isolates recovered from patients with diarrhea in Xinjiang, China between 2008 and 2014.
| Antimicrobial agents | Total | χ2 | P | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | % | No | % | No | % | |||
| FEP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | / | / |
| FOX | 2 | 0.4 | 2 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.5118 | P = 0.4744 |
| CAZ | 8 | 1.7 | 8 | 2.2 | 0 | 0 | 8.601, | P = 0.0034 |
| CFP | 63 | 13.8 | 45 | 12.3 | 18 | 19.4 | 3.084 | P = 0.0791 |
| CRO | 53 | 11.6 | 53 | 14.5 | 18 | 19.4 | 1.322 | P = 0.2502 |
| CFZ | 74 | 16.2 | 56 | 15.3 | 18 | 19.4 | 0.8808 | P = 0.3480 |
| LEV | 31 | 6.8 | 31 | 8.5 | 0 | 0 | 8.472 | P = 0.0036 |
| NOR | 86 | 18.8 | 86 | 23.6 | 0 | 0 | 26.98 | P < 0.0001 |
| IMP | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | / | / |
| PIP | 66 | 14.4 | 45 | 12.3 | 21 | 22.6 | 6.316 | P = 0.0120 |
| TIC | 399 | 87.1 | 339 | 92.9 | 60 | 64.5 | 53.12 | P < 0.0001 |
| AMP | 403 | 88.0 | 343 | 94 | 60 | 64.5 | 60.86 | P < 0.0001 |
| AK | 1 | 0.2 | 1 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0.2554 | P = 0.6133 |
| TO | 11 | 2.4 | 9 | 2.5 | 2 | 2.1 | 0.03142 | P = 0.8593 |
| GN | 57 | 12.4 | 16 | 4.4 | 41 | 44.1 | 107.2 | P < 0.0001 |
| ATM | 33 | 7.2 | 18 | 4.9 | 15 | 16.1 | 13.9 | P = 0.0002 |
| NIT | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | / | / |
| TE | 407 | 88.9 | 324 | 88.8 | 83 | 89.2 | 0.01727 | P = 0.8954 |
| C | 322 | 70.3 | 320 | 87.7 | 2 | 2.1 | 259.7 | P < 0.0001 |
| TIM | 35 | 7.6 | 34 | 9.3 | 1 | 1.1 | 7.13 | P = 0.0076 |
| SXT | 249 | 54.4 | 162 | 44.4 | 87 | 93.5 | 72.21 | P < 0.0001 |
AK, amikacin; AMP, ampicillin; ATM, aztreonam; CFZ, cefazolin; FEP, cefepime; CFP, cefoperazone; FOX, cefoxitin; CAZ, ceftazidime; CRO, ceftriaxone; C, chloramphenicol; GEN, gentamicin; IPM, imipenem; LEV, levofloxacin; NIT, nitrofurantoin; NOR, norfloxacin; PIP, piperacillin; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; TE, tetracycline; TIC, ticarcillin; TIM, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid; TO, tobramycin.
Antimicrobial resistance profiles of Shigella isolates in Xinjiang between 2008 and 2014.
| Antibiotic | Number of isolates (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| No resistance detected | 12 (3.3) | 3 (3.2) |
| Resistant ≥ 1 CLSI class | 353 (96.7) | 90 (96.8) |
| Resistant ≥ 2 CLSI classes | 349 (95.6) | 90 (96.8) |
| Resistant ≥ 3 CLSI classes | 330 (90.4) | 59 (63.4) |
| Resistant ≥ 4 CLSI classes | 200 (54.8) | 53 (57.0) |
| Resistant ≥ 5 CLSI classes | 62 (17.0) | 14 (15.1) |
| Resistant ≥ 6 CLSI classes | 21 (5.8) | 0 |
| Resistant = 7 CLSI classes | 8 (2.2) | 0 |
| Cephalosporin | 57 (15.6) | 18 (19.4) |
| Quinolones | 86 (23.6) | 0 |
| Cephalosporin and quinolones | 17 (4.7) | 0 |
| At least ACTT/S | 136 (37.3) | 0 |
| At least ACTT/SNOR | 38 (10.4) | 0 |
| At least ACTT/SCRO | 22 (6.0) | 0 |
| At least ACTT/SCRONOR | 9 (2.5) | 0 |
*A, ampicillin; C, chloramphenicol; CRO, ceftriaxone; NOR, norfloxacin; T, tetracycline; T/S, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.
Antimicrobial resistance determinants in 75 cephalosporin-resistant Shigella isolates and 86 quinolone-resistant Shigella isolates.
| Resistant determinant | Number of isolates (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 47 (82.5) | 0 | 47 (62.7) | |
| 35 (61.4) | 7 (38.9) | 42 (56.0) | |
| 51 (89.5) | 18 (100%) | 69 (92.0) | |
| CTX-M-1 group | 23 (40.4) | 14 (77.8) | 37 (49.3) |
| 3 (5.3) | 0 (0) | 3 (4.0) | |
| 10 (17.5) | 7 (38.9) | 17 (22.7) | |
| 2 (3.5) | 0 (0) | 2 (2.7) | |
| 6 (10.5) | 7 (38.9) | 13 (17.3) | |
| 2 (3.5) | 0 (0) | 2 (2.7) | |
| CTX-M-9 group | 29 (50.9) | 4 (22.2) | 33 (44.0) |
| 26 (45.6) | 4 (22.2) | 30 (40.0) | |
| 3 (5.3) | 0 (0) | 3 (4.0) | |
| Both CTX-M-1 and CTX-M-9 group | 4 (7.0) | 6 (33.3) | 10 (13.3) |
| 49 (86.0) | 1 (5.6) | 50 (66.7) | |
| 51 (89.5) | 15 (83.3) | 66 (88.0) | |
| 49 (86.0) | 17 (94.4) | 66 (88.0) | |
| QRDRs mutations | 86 (100) | 0 | 86 (100) |
| 86 (100) | 0 | 86 (100) | |
| 86 (100) | 0 | 86 (100) | |
| 62 (72.1) | 0 | 62 (72.1) | |
| 16 (18.6) | 0 | 16 (18.6) | |
| 82 (95.3) | 0 | 82 (95.3) | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 86 (100) | 0 | 86 (100) | |
| 86 (100) | 0 | 86 (100) | |
| Triple (or more) mutations | 86 (100) | 0 | 86 (100) |
| Four mutations | 74 (86.0) | 0 | 74 (86.0) |
| PMQR genes | 3 (3.5) | 0 | 3 (3.5) |
| 1 (1.2) | 0 | 1 (1.2) | |
| 2 (2.3) | 0 | 2 (2.3) | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Antimicrobial resistance profiles and resistance determinants of 17 Shigella isolates co-resistant to cephalosporin and quinolone.
| Isolate | Antimicrobial resistance profile | β-Lactamases gene | QRDRs mutation | PMQR gene | Integron | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hep74-51 | ||||||||||
| XJSF20 | CRO/CFZ/TIC/AMP/NOR/TE/C/STX | + | + | S83L, D87N, H211Y | S80I | - | + | + | + | |
| XJSF22 | CRO/CFP/CFZ/TIC/AMP/PIP/NOR/TE/ATM/C/STX | + | + | S83L, D87G, H211Y | S80I | - | + | + | + | |
| 2010048 | CRO/CFP/CFZ/TIC/AMP/PIP/NOR/TE/ATM/C/STX | + | + | S83L, D87N, H211Y | S80I | - | + | + | + | |
| 2011109 | CRO/CFP/CFZ/TIC/TIM/AMP/PIP/NOR/GN/TE/ATM/C/STX | + | + | S83L, D87G, H211Y | S80I | - | + | + | + | |
| 2012064 | CAZ/CRO/CFP/CFZ/TIC/AMP/NOR/TE/C | + | + | S83L, D87G, H211Y | S80I | - | + | + | + | |
| 2012076 | CRO/CFP/CFZ/TIC/TIM/AMP/PIP/LEV/NOR/TE/ATM/C/STX | + | + | S83L, H211Y | S80I | - | + | + | + | |
| 2012085 | CFZ/TIC/TIM/AMP/NOR/TE/C/STX | + | + | - | S83L, D87N, H211Y | S80I | - | + | + | + |
| 2012131 | CRO/CFP/CFZ/TIC/AMP/PIP/NOR/TE/ATM/C | + | + | S83L, D87G, H211Y | S80I | - | + | + | + | |
| 2012136 | CRO/CFP/CFZ/TIC/TIM/AMP/PIP/LEV/NOR/C | + | + | S83L, D87N, H211Y | S80I | - | + | + | + | |
| 2012262 | CRO/CFP/CFZ/TIC/TIM/AMP/PIP/NOR/TE/C | + | + | - | S83L, D87G, H211Y | S80I | - | + | + | + |
| 2013269 | CAZ/CRO/CFP/CFZ/TIC/TIM/AMP/PIP/LEV/NOR/TE/ATM/C/STX | + | + | S83L, D87N, H211Y | S80I | - | + | + | + | |
| 2013398 | CRO/CFP/CFZ/TIC/TIM/AMP/PIP/LEV/NOR/GN/TE/C/STX | + | + | S83L, H211Y | S80I | - | + | + | + | |
| 2013416 | CRO/CFP/CFZ/TIC/AMP/PIP/NOR/TE/ATM/C/STX | + | + | S83L, D87N, H211Y | S80I | - | + | + | + | |
| 2014104 | CRO/CFP/CFZ/TIC/AMP/PIP/LEV/NOR/GN/TE/ATM/STX | - | - | S83L, D87N, H211Y | S80I | - | + | - | - | |
| 2014331 | CRO/CFP/CFZ/TIC/AMP/PIP/NOR/TE/ATM/C/STX | + | + | S83L, D87N, H211Y | S80I | - | + | + | + | |
| 2014351 | CRO/CFZ/TIC/AMP/LEV/NOR/TE/C/STX | + | - | S83L, H211Y | S80I | - | - | + | + | |
| 2014366 | CRO/CFZ/TIC/AMP/LEV/NOR/TE/C/STX | + | - | S83L, D87N, H211Y | S80I | - | + | + | + | |
AK, amikacin; AMP, ampicillin; ATM, aztreonam; CFZ, cefazolin; FEP, cefepime; CFP, cefoperazone; FOX, cefoxitin; CAZ, ceftazidime; CRO, ceftriaxone; C, chloramphenicol; GEN, gentamicin; IPM, imipenem; LEV, levofloxacin; NIT, nitrofurantoin; NOR, norfloxacin; PIP, piperacillin; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; TE, tetracycline; TIC, ticarcillin; TIM, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid; TO, tobramycin.