Literature DB >> 33174517

Use of explicit processes during a visually guided locomotor learning task predicts 24-h retention after stroke.

Margaret A French1,2, Susanne M Morton1,2, Darcy S Reisman1,2.   

Abstract

Implicit and explicit processes can occur within a single locomotor learning task. The combination of these learning processes may impact how individuals acquire/retain the task. Because these learning processes rely on distinct neural pathways, neurological conditions may selectively impact the processes that occur, thus, impacting learning and retention. Thus, our purpose was to examine the contribution of implicit and explicit processes during a visually guided walking task and characterize the relationship between explicit processes and performance/retention in stroke survivors and age-matched healthy adults. Twenty chronic stroke survivors and twenty healthy adults participated in a 2-day treadmill study. Day 1 included baseline, acquisition1, catch, acquisition2, and immediate retention phases, and day 2 included 24-h retention. During acquisition phases, subjects learned to take a longer step with one leg through distorted visual feedback. During catch and retention phases, visual feedback was removed and subjects were instructed to walk normally (catch) or how they walked during the acquisition phases (retention). Change in step length from baseline to catch represented implicit processes. Change in step length from catch to the end of acquisition2 represented explicit processes. A mixed ANOVA found no difference in the type of learning between groups (P = 0.74). There was a significant relationship between explicit processes and 24-h retention in stroke survivors (r = 0.47, P = 0.04) but not in healthy adults (r = 0.34, P = 0.15). These results suggest that stroke may not affect the underlying learning mechanisms used during locomotor learning, but that these mechanisms impact how well stroke survivors retain the new walking pattern.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study found that stroke survivors used implicit and explicit processes similar to age-matched healthy adults during a visually guided locomotion learning task. The amount of explicit processes was related to how well stroke survivors retained the new walking pattern but not to how well they performed during the task. This work illustrates the importance of understanding the underlying learning mechanisms to maximize retention of a newly learned motor behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  explicit learning; implicit learning; locomotion; retention; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33174517      PMCID: PMC8087382          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00340.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  67 in total

1.  Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching.

Authors:  Ya-Weng Tseng; Jörn Diedrichsen; John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The multiple effects of practice: skill, habit and reduced cognitive load.

Authors:  Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-03-01

3.  Use-dependent plasticity explains aftereffects in visually guided locomotor learning of a novel step length asymmetry.

Authors:  Jonathan M Wood; Hyosub E Kim; Margaret A French; Darcy S Reisman; Susanne M Morton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can improve walking symmetry post-stroke.

Authors:  Darcy S Reisman; Robert Wityk; Kenneth Silver; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Using swing resistance and assistance to improve gait symmetry in individuals post-stroke.

Authors:  Sheng-Che Yen; Brian D Schmit; Ming Wu
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  Maurice A Smith; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Seeing the Errors You Feel Enhances Locomotor Performance but Not Learning.

Authors:  Ryan T Roemmich; Andrew W Long; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Within-session and one-week practice effects on a motor task in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Kevin Duff
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.475

Review 9.  Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.710

10.  Split-belt treadmill adaptation transfers to overground walking in persons poststroke.

Authors:  Darcy S Reisman; Robert Wityk; Kenneth Silver; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 3.919

View more
  4 in total

1.  Visuomotor errors drive step length and step time adaptation during 'virtual' split-belt walking: the effects of reinforcement feedback.

Authors:  Sumire Sato; Ashley Cui; Julia T Choi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Fluid Cognition Relates to Locomotor Switching in Neurotypical Adults, Not Individuals After Stroke.

Authors:  Margaret A French; Matthew L Cohen; Ryan T Pohlig; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  Updates in Motor Learning: Implications for Physical Therapist Practice and Education.

Authors:  Kristan A Leech; Ryan T Roemmich; James Gordon; Darcy S Reisman; Kendra M Cherry-Allen
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2022-01-01

4.  Increased cognitive load in immersive virtual reality during visuomotor adaptation is associated with decreased long-term retention and context transfer.

Authors:  Julia M Juliano; Nicolas Schweighofer; Sook-Lei Liew
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 5.208

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.