Literature DB >> 32208878

Assessing explicit strategies in force field adaptation.

Raphael Schween1, Samuel D McDougle2, Mathias Hegele1,3, Jordan A Taylor4.   

Abstract

In recent years, it has become increasingly clear that a number of learning processes are at play in visuomotor adaptation tasks. In addition to implicitly adapting to a perturbation, learners can develop explicit knowledge allowing them to select better actions in responding to it. Advances in visuomotor rotation experiments have underscored the important role of such "explicit learning" in shaping adaptation to kinematic perturbations. Yet, in adaptation to dynamic perturbations, its contribution has been largely overlooked. We therefore sought to approach the assessment of explicit learning in adaptation to dynamic perturbations, by developing two novel modifications of a force field experiment. First, we asked learners to abandon any cognitive strategy before selected force channel trials to expose consciously accessible parts of overall learning. Here, learners indeed reduced compensatory force compared with standard Catch channels. Second, we instructed a group of learners to mimic their right hand's adaptation by moving with their naïve left hand. While a control group displayed negligible left hand force compensation, the mimicking group reported forces that approximated right hand adaptation but appeared to under-report the velocity component of the force field in favor of a more position-based component. Our results highlight the viability of explicit learning as a potential contributor to force field adaptation, though the fraction of learning under participants' deliberate control on average remained considerably smaller than that of implicit learning, despite task conditions favoring explicit learning. The methods we employed provide a starting point for investigating the contribution of explicit strategies to force field adaptation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY While the contribution of explicit learning has been increasingly studied in visuomotor adaptation, its contribution to force field adaptation has not been studied extensively. We employed two novel methods to assay explicit learning in a force field adaptation task and found that learners can voluntarily control aspects of compensatory force production and manually report it with their untrained limb. This supports the general viability of the contribution of explicit learning also in force field adaptation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action selection; declarative memory; internal model; sensorimotor; visuomotor adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32208878      PMCID: PMC7191530          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00427.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  77 in total

1.  Dissociable effects of the implicit and explicit memory systems on learning control of reaching.

Authors:  Eun Jung Hwang; Maurice A Smith; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Primitives for motor adaptation reflect correlated neural tuning to position and velocity.

Authors:  Gary C Sing; Wilsaan M Joiner; Thrishantha Nanayakkara; Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  The influence of movement preparation time on the expression of visuomotor learning and savings.

Authors:  Adrian M Haith; David M Huberdeau; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Age-related variations of visuomotor adaptation result from both the acquisition and the application of explicit knowledge.

Authors:  Mathias Hegele; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-03-18

5.  Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning.

Authors:  Maurice A Smith; Ali Ghazizadeh; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  In Experts, underlying processes that drive visuomotor adaptation are different than in Novices.

Authors:  Christian Leukel; Albert Gollhofer; Wolfgang Taube
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Multiple motor memories are learned to control different points on a tool.

Authors:  James B Heald; James N Ingram; J Randall Flanagan; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-04-09

8.  Plan-based generalization shapes local implicit adaptation to opposing visuomotor transformations.

Authors:  Raphael Schween; Jordan A Taylor; Mathias Hegele
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Savings upon Re-Aiming in Visuomotor Adaptation.

Authors:  J Ryan Morehead; Salman E Qasim; Matthew J Crossley; Richard Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The relationship between reinforcement and explicit control during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Olivier Codol; Peter J Holland; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  12 in total

1.  De novo learning versus adaptation of continuous control in a manual tracking task.

Authors:  Christopher S Yang; Noah J Cowan; Adrian M Haith
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Revisiting the Role of the Medial Temporal Lobe in Motor Learning.

Authors:  Samuel D McDougle; Sarah A Wilterson; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Reexposure to a sensorimotor perturbation produces opposite effects on explicit and implicit learning processes.

Authors:  Guy Avraham; J Ryan Morehead; Hyosub E Kim; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Adaptation of reach action to a novel force-field is not predicted by acuity of dynamic proprioception in either older or younger adults.

Authors:  Nick M Kitchen; R Chris Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Updates in Motor Learning: Implications for Physical Therapist Practice and Education.

Authors:  Kristan A Leech; Ryan T Roemmich; James Gordon; Darcy S Reisman; Kendra M Cherry-Allen
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2022-01-01

6.  Individual Differences in Sensorimotor Adaptation Are Conserved Over Time and Across Force-Field Tasks.

Authors:  Robert T Moore; Tyler Cluff
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Evidence that endpoint feedback facilitates intermanual transfer of visuomotor force learning by a cognitive strategy.

Authors:  Jack De Havas; Patrick Haggard; Hiroaki Gomi; Sven Bestmann; Yuji Ikegaya; Nobuhiro Hagura
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Use of explicit processes during a visually guided locomotor learning task predicts 24-h retention after stroke.

Authors:  Margaret A French; Susanne M Morton; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Reinforcement Signaling Can Be Used to Reduce Elements of Cerebellar Reaching Ataxia.

Authors:  Amanda S Therrien; Matthew A Statton; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 10.  The Psychology of Reaching: Action Selection, Movement Implementation, and Sensorimotor Learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Guy Avraham; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 24.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.