Literature DB >> 32738430

Exposure to Auditory Feedback Delay while Speaking Induces Perceptual Habituation but does not Mitigate the Disruptive Effect of Delay on Speech Auditory-motor Learning.

Douglas M Shiller1, Takashi Mitsuya2, Ludo Max3.   

Abstract

Perceiving the sensory consequences of our actions with a delay alters the interpretation of these afferent signals and impacts motor learning. For reaching movements, delayed visual feedback of hand position reduces the rate and extent of visuomotor adaptation, but substantial adaptation still occurs. Moreover, the detrimental effect of visual feedback delay on reach motor learning-selectively affecting its implicit component-can be mitigated by prior habituation to the delay. Auditory-motor learning for speech has been reported to be more sensitive to feedback delay, and it remains unknown whether habituation to auditory delay reduces its negative impact on learning. We investigated whether 30 min of exposure to auditory delay during speaking (a) affects the subjective perception of delay, and (b) mitigates its disruptive effect on speech auditory-motor learning. During a speech adaptation task with real-time perturbation of vowel spectral properties, participants heard this frequency-shifted feedback with no delay, 75 ms delay, or 115 ms delay. In the delay groups, 50% of participants had been exposed to the delay throughout a preceding 30-minute block of speaking whereas the remaining participants completed this block without delay. Although habituation minimized awareness of the delay, no improvement in adaptation to the spectral perturbation was observed. Thus, short-term habituation to auditory feedback delays is not effective in reducing the negative impact of delay on speech auditory-motor adaptation. Combined with previous findings, the strong negative effect of delay and the absence of an influence of delay awareness suggest the involvement of predominantly implicit learning mechanisms in speech.
Copyright © 2020 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; auditory feedback; delay; habituation; sensorimotor learning; speech

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32738430      PMCID: PMC7530077          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.07.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  46 in total

1.  Voluntary action and conscious awareness.

Authors:  Patrick Haggard; Sam Clark; Jeri Kalogeras
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Is the cerebellum a smith predictor?

Authors:  R C Miall; D J Weir; D M Wolpert; J F Stein
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Adaptation to visual feedback delays in manual tracking: evidence against the Smith Predictor model of human visually guided action.

Authors:  R C Miall; J K Jackson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Feedback delay attenuates implicit but facilitates explicit adjustments to a visuomotor rotation.

Authors:  Raphael Schween; Mathias Hegele
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Contribution of explicit processes to reinforcement-based motor learning.

Authors:  Peter Holland; Olivier Codol; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate.

Authors:  K G Munhall; E N MacDonald; S K Byrne; I Johnsrude
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Some organizational characteristics of speech movement control.

Authors:  V L Gracco
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-02

8.  Contributions of spatial working memory to visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Joaquin A Anguera; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Daniel T Willingham; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Habituation to feedback delay restores degraded visuomotor adaptation by altering both sensory prediction error and the sensitivity of adaptation to the error.

Authors:  Takuya Honda; Masaya Hirashima; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-14

10.  Dissociable cognitive strategies for sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Samuel D McDougle; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  6 in total

1.  Individual sensorimotor adaptation characteristics are independent across orofacial speech movements and limb reaching movements.

Authors:  Nick M Kitchen; Kwang S Kim; Prince Z Wang; Robert J Hermosillo; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.974

2.  Speech auditory-motor adaptation to formant-shifted feedback lacks an explicit component: Reduced adaptation in adults who stutter reflects limitations in implicit sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Kwang S Kim; Ludo Max
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Auditory Feedback Is Used for Adaptation and Compensation in Speech Timing.

Authors:  Robin Karlin; Chris Naber; Benjamin Parrell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Disruption of speech motor adaptation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the articulatory representation in primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Ding-Lan Tang; Alexander McDaniel; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Inter-Trial Formant Variability in Speech Production Is Actively Controlled but Does Not Affect Subsequent Adaptation to a Predictable Formant Perturbation.

Authors:  Hantao Wang; Ludo Max
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.473

6.  Dissociated Development of Speech and Limb Sensorimotor Learning in Stuttering: Speech Auditory-motor Learning is Impaired in Both Children and Adults Who Stutter.

Authors:  Kwang S Kim; Ayoub Daliri; J Randall Flanagan; Ludo Max
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.590

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.