Literature DB >> 31033439

The influence of task outcome on implicit motor learning.

Hyosub E Kim1,2,3,4, Darius E Parvin1,2, Richard B Ivry1,2.   

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that task success signals can modulate learning during sensorimotor adaptation tasks, primarily through engaging explicit processes. Here, we examine the influence of task outcome on implicit adaptation, using a reaching task in which adaptation is induced by feedback that is not contingent on actual performance. We imposed an invariant perturbation (rotation) on the feedback cursor while varying the target size. In this way, the cursor either hit or missed the target, with the former producing a marked attenuation of implicit motor learning. We explored different computational architectures that might account for how task outcome information interacts with implicit adaptation. The results fail to support an architecture in which adaptation operates in parallel with a model-free operant reinforcement process. Rather, task outcome may serve as a gain on implicit adaptation or provide a distinct error signal for a second, independent implicit learning process. Editorial note: This article has been through an editorial process in which the authors decide how to respond to the issues raised during peer review. The Reviewing Editor's assessment is that all the issues have been addressed (see decision letter).
© 2019, Kim et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; human; motor learning; neuroscience; reaching; reward learning

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31033439      PMCID: PMC6488295          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.39882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  62 in total

1.  The cerebellum does more than sensory prediction error-based learning in sensorimotor adaptation tasks.

Authors:  Peter A Butcher; Richard B Ivry; Sheng-Han Kuo; David Rydz; John W Krakauer; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching.

Authors:  Ya-Weng Tseng; Jörn Diedrichsen; John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Parallel specification of competing sensorimotor control policies for alternative action options.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Lindsey Logan; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Dual-process decomposition in human sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  David M Huberdeau; John W Krakauer; Adrian M Haith
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos; A B Schwartz; R E Kettner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The influence of task outcome on implicit motor learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Darius E Parvin; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability.

Authors:  J Gordon; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Cerebellar granule cells encode the expectation of reward.

Authors:  Mark J Wagner; Tony Hyun Kim; Joan Savall; Mark J Schnitzer; Liqun Luo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Visuomotor Learning Generalizes Around the Intended Movement.

Authors:  Kevin A Day; Ryan T Roemmich; Jordan A Taylor; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-04-29

10.  Climbing fibers encode a temporal-difference prediction error during cerebellar learning in mice.

Authors:  Shogo Ohmae; Javier F Medina
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  20 in total

1.  Task Errors Drive Memories That Improve Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Authors:  Li-Ann Leow; Welber Marinovic; Aymar de Rugy; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Use-dependent plasticity explains aftereffects in visually guided locomotor learning of a novel step length asymmetry.

Authors:  Jonathan M Wood; Hyosub E Kim; Margaret A French; Darcy S Reisman; Susanne M Morton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The influence of task outcome on implicit motor learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Darius E Parvin; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Motor learning without movement.

Authors:  Olivia A Kim; Alexander D Forrence; Samuel D McDougle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Heksor: the central nervous system substrate of an adaptive behaviour.

Authors:  Jonathan R Wolpaw; Adam Kamesar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 6.228

6.  Competition between parallel sensorimotor learning systems.

Authors:  Scott T Albert; Jihoon Jang; Shanaathanan Modchalingam; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Henriques; Gonzalo Lerner; Valeria Della-Maggiore; Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 8.713

7.  The cost of correcting for error during sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Ehsan Sedaghat-Nejad; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  An implicit memory of errors limits human sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Scott T Albert; Jihoon Jang; Hannah R Sheahan; Lonneke Teunissen; Koenraad Vandevoorde; David J Herzfeld; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-02-04

9.  Eye Movements during Visuomotor Adaptation Represent Only Part of the Explicit Learning.

Authors:  Zohar Bromberg; Opher Donchin; Shlomi Haar
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-12-23

Review 10.  The Psychology of Reaching: Action Selection, Movement Implementation, and Sensorimotor Learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Guy Avraham; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 24.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.