Literature DB >> 25706473

The dissociable effects of punishment and reward on motor learning.

Joseph M Galea1, Elizabeth Mallia2, John Rothwell2, Jörn Diedrichsen3.   

Abstract

A common assumption regarding error-based motor learning (motor adaptation) in humans is that its underlying mechanism is automatic and insensitive to reward- or punishment-based feedback. Contrary to this hypothesis, we show in a double dissociation that the two have independent effects on the learning and retention components of motor adaptation. Negative feedback, whether graded or binary, accelerated learning. While it was not necessary for the negative feedback to be coupled to monetary loss, it had to be clearly related to the actual performance on the preceding movement. Positive feedback did not speed up learning, but it increased retention of the motor memory when performance feedback was withdrawn. These findings reinforce the view that independent mechanisms underpin learning and retention in motor adaptation, reject the assumption that motor adaptation is independent of motivational feedback, and raise new questions regarding the neural basis of negative and positive motivational feedback in motor learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25706473     DOI: 10.1038/nn.3956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  49 in total

Review 1.  Opponent interactions between serotonin and dopamine.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Daw; Sham Kakade; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2002 Jun-Jul

2.  Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns.

Authors:  James L Patton; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Punishing an error improves learning: the influence of punishment magnitude on error-related neural activity and subsequent learning.

Authors:  Robert Hester; Kevin Murphy; Felicity L Brown; Ashley J Skilleter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Adaptation to visuomotor rotation through interaction between posterior parietal and motor cortical areas.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Terrence J Sejnowski; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Model-based and model-free mechanisms of human motor learning.

Authors:  Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response.

Authors:  D A McCormick; R F Thompson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  The role of strategies in motor learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Overcoming motor "forgetting" through reinforcement of learned actions.

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; Vincent S Huang; Adrian M Haith; Raymond J Delnicki; Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Secondary tasks impair adaptation to step- and gradual-visual displacements.

Authors:  J M Galea; S A Sami; N B Albert; R C Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  112 in total

1.  Individual differences in TMS sensitivity influence the efficacy of tDCS in facilitating sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  L Labruna; A Stark-Inbar; A Breska; M Dabit; B Vanderschelden; M A Nitsche; R B Ivry
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Characteristics of Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation Revealed by Task-irrelevant Clamped Feedback.

Authors:  J Ryan Morehead; Jordan A Taylor; Darius E Parvin; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Financial incentives enhance adaptation to a sensorimotor transformation.

Authors:  Kathrin Gajda; Sandra Sülzenbrück; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Explicit and Implicit Processes Constitute the Fast and Slow Processes of Sensorimotor Learning.

Authors:  Samuel D McDougle; Krista M Bond; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Somatosensory Cortex Plays an Essential Role in Forelimb Motor Adaptation in Mice.

Authors:  Mackenzie Weygandt Mathis; Alexander Mathis; Naoshige Uchida
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Selective reward affects the rate of saccade adaptation.

Authors:  Yoshiko Kojima; Robijanto Soetedjo
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Cortical neurons multiplex reward-related signals along with sensory and motor information.

Authors:  Arjun Ramakrishnan; Yoon Woo Byun; Kyle Rand; Christian E Pedersen; Mikhail A Lebedev; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Resistance, vulnerability and resilience: A review of the cognitive cerebellum in aging and neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Katharine J Liang; Erik S Carlson
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Noninvasive neurostimulation of left ventral motor cortex enhances sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  Terri L Scott; Laura Haenchen; Ayoub Daliri; Julia Chartove; Frank H Guenther; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Somatosensory working memory in human reinforcement-based motor learning.

Authors:  Ananda Sidarta; Floris T van Vugt; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.