Literature DB >> 31242063

Interactions between motor exploration and reinforcement learning.

Shintaro Uehara1,2, Firas Mawase1, Amanda S Therrien3,4, Kendra M Cherry-Allen1, Pablo Celnik1,3.   

Abstract

Motor exploration, a trial-and-error process in search for better motor outcomes, is known to serve a critical role in motor learning. This is particularly relevant during reinforcement learning, where actions leading to a successful outcome are reinforced while unsuccessful actions are avoided. Although early on motor exploration is beneficial to finding the correct solution, maintaining high levels of exploration later in the learning process might be deleterious. Whether and how the level of exploration changes over the course of reinforcement learning, however, remains poorly understood. Here we evaluated temporal changes in motor exploration while healthy participants learned a reinforcement-based motor task. We defined exploration as the magnitude of trial-to-trial change in movements as a function of whether the preceding trial resulted in success or failure. Participants were required to find the optimal finger-pointing direction using binary feedback of success or failure. We found that the magnitude of exploration gradually increased over time when participants were learning the task. Conversely, exploration remained low in participants who were unable to correctly adjust their pointing direction. Interestingly, exploration remained elevated when participants underwent a second training session, which was associated with faster relearning. These results indicate that the motor system may flexibly upregulate the extent of exploration during reinforcement learning as if acquiring a specific strategy to facilitate subsequent learning. Also, our findings showed that exploration affects reinforcement learning and vice versa, indicating an interactive relationship between them. Reinforcement-based tasks could be used as primers to increase exploratory behavior leading to more efficient subsequent learning.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Motor exploration, the ability to search for the correct actions, is critical to learning motor skills. Despite this, whether and how the level of exploration changes over the course of training remains poorly understood. We showed that exploration increased and remained high throughout training of a reinforcement-based motor task. Interestingly, elevated exploration persisted and facilitated subsequent learning. These results suggest that the motor system upregulates exploration as if learning a strategy to facilitate subsequent learning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  meta-learning; motor exploration; reinforcement learning; savings; trial and error

Year:  2019        PMID: 31242063      PMCID: PMC6734400          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00390.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  37 in total

1.  The role of execution noise in movement variability.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers; Patrick Haggard; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Control of variation by reward probability.

Authors:  Afshin Gharib; Christopher Gade; Seth Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-10

3.  Rethinking motor learning and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; Adrian Haith; Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Savings in locomotor adaptation explained by changes in learning parameters following initial adaptation.

Authors:  Firas Mawase; Lior Shmuelof; Simona Bar-Haim; Amir Karniel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Pietro Mazzoni
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Use-dependent and error-based learning of motor behaviors.

Authors:  Jörn Diedrichsen; Olivier White; Darren Newman; Níall Lally
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Claude Ghez; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Motor task variation induces structural learning.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Ad Aertsen; Daniel M Wolpert; Carsten Mehring
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Structure learning in action.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Carsten Mehring; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Predicting explorative motor learning using decision-making and motor noise.

Authors:  Xiuli Chen; Kieran Mohr; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  11 in total

1.  Updates in Motor Learning: Implications for Physical Therapist Practice and Education.

Authors:  Kristan A Leech; Ryan T Roemmich; James Gordon; Darcy S Reisman; Kendra M Cherry-Allen
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2022-01-01

2.  Nash equilibria in human sensorimotor interactions explained by Q-learning with intrinsic costs.

Authors:  Cecilia Lindig-León; Gerrit Schmid; Daniel A Braun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Applying artificial intelligence for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Zhijie Xu; Xiang Wang; Shuangshuang Zeng; Xinxin Ren; Yuanliang Yan; Zhicheng Gong
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 11.413

4.  Clustering analysis of movement kinematics in reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Ananda Sidarta; John Komar; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Directed information flow during laparoscopic surgical skill acquisition dissociated skill level and medical simulation technology.

Authors:  Anil Kamat; Basiel Makled; Jack Norfleet; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Xavier Intes; Suvranu De; Anirban Dutta
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2022-08-25

6.  Reinforcement Signaling Can Be Used to Reduce Elements of Cerebellar Reaching Ataxia.

Authors:  Amanda S Therrien; Matthew A Statton; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Quantifying exploration in reward-based motor learning.

Authors:  Nina M van Mastrigt; Jeroen B J Smeets; Katinka van der Kooij
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Reward boosts reinforcement-based motor learning.

Authors:  Pierre Vassiliadis; Gerard Derosiere; Cecile Dubuc; Aegryan Lete; Frederic Crevecoeur; Friedhelm C Hummel; Julie Duque
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-07-07

Review 9.  Mechanisms of Human Motor Learning Do Not Function Independently.

Authors:  Amanda S Therrien; Aaron L Wong
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.473

10.  Pitfalls in quantifying exploration in reward-based motor learning and how to avoid them.

Authors:  Nina M van Mastrigt; Katinka van der Kooij; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.