Literature DB >> 22482604

Effect of slice thickness on detectability in breast CT using a prewhitened matched filter and simulated mass lesions.

Nathan J Packard1, Craig K Abbey, Kai Yang, John M Boone.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dedicated breast CT (bCT) is an emerging technology with the potential to improve the detection of breast cancer in screening and diagnostic capacities. Typically, the 3D volume reconstructed from the scanner is displayed as sectional images. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of section thickness on the detectability of simulated masses using a prewhitened matched filter (PWMF) as a model observer.
METHODS: A breast CT scanner has been designed and fabricated in the authors' laboratory with more than 200 women imaged in IRB-approved phase I and phase II trials to date. Of these, 151 bilateral data sets were selected on the basis of low artifact content, sufficient breast coverage, and excluding cases with breast implants. BIRADS breast density ratings were available for 144 of these patients. Spherical mass lesions of diameter 1, 2, 3, 5, 11, and 15 mm were mathematically generated and embedded at random locations within the parenchymal region of each bCT volume. Microcalcifications were not simulated in this study. For each viewing plane (sagittal, axial, and coronal) and section thickness (ranging from 0.3 to 44 mm), section images of the breast parenchyma containing the lesion were generated from the reconstructed bCT data sets by averaging voxels over the length of the section. Using signal known exactly (SKE) model observer methodology, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed on each generated projected image using a PWMF based model observer. ROC curves were generated for each breast data set, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was evaluated as well as the sensitivity at 95% specificity.
RESULTS: For all lesion sizes, performance rises modestly to a peak before falling off substantially as section thickness increases over the range of the study. We find that the optimal section thickness tracks the size of the lesion to be detected linearly with a small positive offset and slopes ranging from 0.27 to 0.44. No significant differences were observed between left and right breasts. Performance measures are negatively correlated with measures of breast density, with an average correlation coefficient of -0.48 for the BIRADS breast density score and -0.81 for the proportion of glandular tissue in the breast interior.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows quantitatively how PWMF detection performance of a known lesion size is influenced by section thickness in dedicated breast CT. While the optimal section thickness is tuned to the size of the lesion being detected, overall performance is more robust for thin section images compared to thicker images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22482604      PMCID: PMC3316691          DOI: 10.1118/1.3692176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  31 in total

1.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. III. Calculation of figures of merit for model observers in statistically nonstationary backgrounds.

Authors:  F O Bochud; C K Abbey; M P Eckstein
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager.

Authors:  Xing Gong; Aruna A Vedula; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Classification of breast computed tomography data.

Authors:  Thomas R Nelson; Laura I Cerviño; John M Boone; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The myth of the 50-50 breast.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; J M Boone; N Packard; O Alonzo-Proulx; S Y Huang; C L Peressotti; A Al-Mayah; K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast.

Authors:  M P Eckstein; J S Whiting
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Computed tomography for imaging the breast.

Authors:  John M Boone; Alex L C Kwan; Kai Yang; George W Burkett; Karen K Lindfors; Thomas R Nelson
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

7.  Using a NPWE model observer to assess suitable image quality for a digital mammography quality assurance programme.

Authors:  P Monnin; F O Bochud; F R Verdun
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 0.972

8.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification.

Authors:  A E Burgess; H Ghandeharian
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.

Authors:  A E Burgess; F L Jacobson; P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Towards optimized acquisition scheme for multiprojection correlation imaging of breast cancer.

Authors:  Amarpreet S Chawla; Robert S Saunders; Swatee Singh; Joseph Y Lo; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  10 in total

1.  Task-based optimization of dedicated breast CT via Hotelling observer metrics.

Authors:  Adrian A Sanchez; Emil Y Sidky; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Noise, sampling, and the number of projections in cone-beam CT with a flat-panel detector.

Authors:  Z Zhao; G J Gang; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast.

Authors:  L Chen; J M Boone; C K Abbey; J Hargreaves; C Bateni; K K Lindfors; K Yang; A Nosratieh; A Hernandez; P Gazi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Classification images for localization performance in ramp-spectrum noise.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Frank W Samuelson; Rongping Zeng; John M Boone; Miguel P Eckstein; Kyle Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Association between power law coefficients of the anatomical noise power spectrum and lesion detectability in breast imaging modalities.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Craig K Abbey; John M Boone
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Visual-search observers for assessing tomographic x-ray image quality.

Authors:  Howard C Gifford; Zhihua Liang; Mini Das
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Comparative observer effects in 2D and 3D localization tasks.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Miguel A Lago; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-03-18

8.  Effect of optical blurring of X-ray source on breast tomosynthesis image quality: Modulation transfer function, anatomical noise power spectrum, and signal detectability perspectives.

Authors:  Changwoo Lee; Jongduk Baek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  High-resolution μ CT imaging for characterizing microcalcification detection performance in breast CT.

Authors:  Andrew M Hernandez; Amy E Becker; Su Hyun Lyu; Craig K Abbey; John M Boone
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-07-20

10.  Human and model observer performance for lesion detection in breast cone beam CT images with the FDK reconstruction.

Authors:  Minah Han; Byeongjoon Kim; Jongduk Baek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.