Literature DB >> 12858951

Statistical decision theory and trade-offs in the control of motor response.

Julia Trommershäuser1, Laurence T Maloney, Michael S Landy.   

Abstract

We present a novel approach to the modeling of motor responses based on statistical decision theory. We begin with the hypothesis that subjects are ideal motion planners who choose movement trajectories to minimize expected loss. We derive predictions of the hypothesis for movement in environments where contact with specified regions carries rewards or penalties. The model predicts shifts in a subject's aiming point in response to changes in the reward and penalty structure of the environment and with changes in the subject's uncertainty in carrying out planned movements. We tested some of these predictions in an experiment where subjects were rewarded if they succeeded in touching a target region on a computer screen within a specified time limit. Near the target was a penalty region which, if touched, resulted in a penalty. We varied distance between the penalty region and the target and the cost of hitting the penalty region. Subjects shift their mean points of contact with the computer screen in response to changes in penalties and location of the penalty region relative to the target region in qualitative agreement with the predictions of the hypothesis. Thus, movement planning takes into account extrinsic costs and the subject's own motor uncertainty.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12858951     DOI: 10.1163/156856803322467527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spat Vis        ISSN: 0169-1015


  86 in total

Review 1.  Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Planning multiple movements within a fixed time limit: the cost of constrained time allocation in a visuo-motor task.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; Shih-Wei Wu; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Motor control is decision-making.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Eye-hand coordination while pointing rapidly under risk.

Authors:  Anna Ma-Wyatt; Martin Stritzke; Julia Trommershäuser
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hitting moving targets: effects of target speed and dimensions on movement time.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Combining priors and noisy visual cues in a rapid pointing task.

Authors:  Hadley Tassinari; Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Perceptuo-motor, cognitive, and description-based decision-making seem equally good.

Authors:  Andreas Jarvstad; Ulrike Hahn; Simon K Rushton; Paul A Warren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Variability in motor learning: relocating, channeling and reducing noise.

Authors:  R G Cohen; D Sternad
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  No bridge too high: infants decide whether to cross based on the probability of falling not the severity of the potential fall.

Authors:  Kari S Kretch; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2013-02-09

10.  Bi-stable depth ordering of superimposed moving gratings.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Bote; Asya Shpiro; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.