Literature DB >> 35754205

A minimum SNR criterion for computed tomography object detection in the projection domain.

Scott S Hsieh1, Shuai Leng1, Lifeng Yu1, Nathan R Huber1, Cynthia H McCollough1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A common rule of thumb for object detection is the Rose criterion, which states that a signal must be five standard deviations above background to be detectable to a human observer. The validity of the Rose criterion in CT imaging is limited due to the presence of correlated noise. Recent reconstruction and denoising methodologies are also able to restore apparent image quality in very noisy conditions, and the ultimate limits of these methodologies are not yet known.
PURPOSE: To establish a lower bound on the minimum achievable signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for object detection, below which detection performance is poor regardless of reconstruction or denoising methodology.
METHODS: We consider a numerical observer that operates on projection data and has perfect knowledge of the background and the objects to be detected, and determine the minimum projection SNR that is necessary to achieve predetermined lesion-level sensitivity and case-level specificity targets. We define a set of discrete signal objects O $\mathcal{O}$ that encompasses any lesion of interest and could include lesions of different sizes, shapes, and locations. The task is to determine which object of O $\mathcal{O}$ is present, or to state the null hypothesis that no object is present. We constrain each object in O $\mathcal{O}$ to have equivalent projection SNR and use Monte Carlo methods to calculate the required projection SNR necessary. Because our calculations are performed in projection space, they impose an upper limit on the performance possible from reconstructed images. We chose O $\mathcal{O}$ to be a collection of elliptical or circular low contrast metastases and simulated detection of these objects in a parallel beam system with Gaussian statistics. Unless otherwise stated, we assume a target of 80% lesion-level sensitivity and 80% case-level specificity and a search field of view that is 6 cm by 6 cm by 10 slices.
RESULTS: When O $\mathcal{O}$ contains only a single object, our problem is equivalent to two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) and the required projection SNR is 1.7. When O $\mathcal{O}$ consists of circular 6-mm lesions at different locations in space, the required projection SNR is 5.1. When O $\mathcal{O}$ is extended to include ellipses and circles of different sizes, the required projection SNR increases to 5.3. The required SNR increases if the sensitivity target, specificity target, or search field of view increases.
CONCLUSIONS: Even with perfect knowledge of the background and target objects, the ideal observer still requires an SNR of approximately 5. This is a lower bound on the SNR that would be required in real conditions, where the background and target objects are not known perfectly. Algorithms that denoise lesions with less than 5 projection SNR, regardless of the denoising methodology, are expected to show vanishing effects or false positive lesions.
© 2022 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IM-CT image reconstruction; IM-CT radiation dosimetry and risk; IM-CT theory

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35754205      PMCID: PMC9446706          DOI: 10.1002/mp.15832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.506


  23 in total

1.  The Rose model, revisited.

Authors:  A E Burgess
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Scanners and drillers: characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Melissa Le-Hoa Vo; Alex Olwal; Francine Jacobson; Steven E Seltzer; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Clinical evaluation of a phantom-based deep convolutional neural network for whole-body-low-dose and ultra-low-dose CT skeletal surveys.

Authors:  Nathan Huber; Tara Anderson; Andrew Missert; Mark Adkins; Shuai Leng; Joel Fletcher; Cynthia McCollough; Lifeng Yu; Katrina N Glazebrook
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Classification images for localization performance in ramp-spectrum noise.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Frank W Samuelson; Rongping Zeng; John M Boone; Miguel P Eckstein; Kyle Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Prospective Evaluation of Reduced Dose Computed Tomography for the Detection of Low-Contrast Liver Lesions: Direct Comparison with Concurrent Standard Dose Imaging.

Authors:  B Dustin Pooler; Meghan G Lubner; David H Kim; Oliver T Chen; Ke Li; Guang-Hong Chen; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Correlation between a 2D channelized Hotelling observer and human observers in a low-contrast detection task with multislice reading in CT.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Baiyu Chen; James M Kofler; Christopher P Favazza; Shuai Leng; Matthew A Kupinski; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Generative Adversarial Networks for Noise Reduction in Low-Dose CT.

Authors:  Jelmer M Wolterink; Tim Leiner; Max A Viergever; Ivana Isgum
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Observer Performance with Varying Radiation Dose and Reconstruction Methods for Detection of Hepatic Metastases.

Authors:  Joel G Fletcher; Jeff L Fidler; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; David M Hough; Naoki Takahashi; Lifeng Yu; Matthew Johnson; Shuai Leng; David R Holmes; Rickey Carter; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Observer efficiency in free-localization tasks with correlated noise.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-01

10.  Assessing the Impact of Deep Neural Network-Based Image Denoising on Binary Signal Detection Tasks.

Authors:  Kaiyan Li; Weimin Zhou; Hua Li; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.