Literature DB >> 29459237

Post-encoding control of working memory enhances processing of relevant information in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Ryan J Brady1, Robert R Hampton2.   

Abstract

Working memory is a system by which a limited amount of information can be kept available for processing after the cessation of sensory input. Because working memory resources are limited, it is adaptive to focus processing on the most relevant information. We used a retro-cue paradigm to determine the extent to which monkey working memory possesses control mechanisms that focus processing on the most relevant representations. Monkeys saw a sample array of images, and shortly after the array disappeared, they were visually cued to a location that had been occupied by one of the sample images. The cue indicated which image should be remembered for the upcoming recognition test. By determining whether the monkeys were more accurate and quicker to respond to cued images compared to un-cued images, we tested the hypothesis that monkey working memory focuses processing on relevant information. We found a memory benefit for the cued image in terms of accuracy and retrieval speed with a memory load of two images. With a memory load of three images, we found a benefit in retrieval speed but only after shortening the onset latency of the retro-cue. Our results demonstrate previously unknown flexibility in the cognitive control of memory in monkeys, suggesting that control mechanisms in working memory likely evolved in a common ancestor of humans and monkeys more than 32 million years ago. Future work should be aimed at understanding the interaction between memory load and the ability to control memory resources, and the role of working memory control in generating differences in cognitive capacity among primates.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Cognitive control; Primate; Retro-cue

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29459237      PMCID: PMC5879026          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  32 in total

1.  Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.

Authors:  Ivan C Griffin; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Interactions between attention and visual short-term memory (VSTM): what can be learnt from individual and developmental differences?

Authors:  Duncan E Astle; Gaia Scerif
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Directing spatial attention in mental representations: Interactions between attentional orienting and working-memory load.

Authors:  Jöran Lepsien; Ivan C Griffin; Joseph T Devlin; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Interference from filled delays on visual change detection.

Authors:  Tal Makovski; Won Mok Shim; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Cellular basis of working memory.

Authors:  P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

8.  Orienting attention to locations in mental representations.

Authors:  Duncan Edward Astle; Jennifer Summerfield; Ivan Griffin; Anna Christina Nobre
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  A neural mechanism of speed-accuracy tradeoff in macaque area LIP.

Authors:  Timothy Hanks; Roozbeh Kiani; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores?

Authors:  Ilja G Sligte; H Steven Scholte; Victor A F Lamme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Nonverbal Working Memory for Novel Images in Rhesus Monkeys.

Authors:  Ryan J Brady; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Cognitive control of working memory but not familiarity in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Emily Kathryn Brown; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Working memory capacity of crows and monkeys arises from similar neuronal computations.

Authors:  Lukas Alexander Hahn; Dmitry Balakhonov; Erica Fongaro; Andreas Nieder; Jonas Rose
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 4.  Explicit memory and cognition in monkeys.

Authors:  Robert R Hampton; Jonathan W M Engelberg; Ryan J Brady
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Greater dependence on working memory and restricted familiarity in orangutans compared with rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Ryan J Brady; Jennifer M Mickelberg; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.699

6.  Crows control working memory before and after stimulus encoding.

Authors:  Erica Fongaro; Jonas Rose
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.