Literature DB >> 25324180

Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry.

Nash Unsworth1, Matthew K Robison.   

Abstract

We utilized pupillary responses as an online measure of attentional allocation and fluctuations in attention in order to better examine both how attention is allocated to items in working memory (WM) and individual differences therein. We found that the pupillary response during a delay was modulated by the number of items to be held in memory, reaching asymptote close to capacity limits. Furthermore, we found that during the delay, how individuals allocated attention to items in WM depended on the number of items to be held, as well as on an individual's capacity. Finally, we found that pretrial pupil diameter distinguished correct and error responses and that individuals with more variability in pretrial pupil diameter had lower behavioral capacity estimates. These results suggest that individual differences in WM are due both to differences in the amount of attention that can be allocated to maintain items in WM and to differences in fluctuations in attention control across trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25324180     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0747-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  26 in total

1.  Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  J Jay Todd; René Marois
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance.

Authors:  Gary Aston-Jones; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving.

Authors:  E H Hess; J M Polt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-03-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Detecting phasic lapses in alertness using pupillometric measures.

Authors:  Sean D Kristjansson; John A Stern; Timothy B Brown; John W Rohrbaugh
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Pupil size, information overload, and performance differences.

Authors:  W S Peavler
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  The intensity dimension of thought: pupillometric indices of sentence processing.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1993-06

9.  Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources.

Authors:  J Beatty
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Pupillography as an objective indicator of fatigue.

Authors:  Y Morad; H Lemberg; N Yofe; Y Dagan
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.424

View more
  29 in total

1.  Structural Relationship Between Cognitive Processing and Syntactic Sentence Comprehension in Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  James W Montgomery; Julia L Evans; Jamison D Fargo; Sarah Schwartz; Ronald B Gillam
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Contralateral Delay Activity Tracks Fluctuations in Working Memory Performance.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Matthew K Robison; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

4.  Individual differences in baseline oculometrics: Examining variation in baseline pupil diameter, spontaneous eye blink rate, and fixation stability.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison; Ashley L Miller
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Cognitive predictors of sentence comprehension in children with and without developmental language disorder: Implications for assessment and treatment.

Authors:  Ronald B Gillam; James W Montgomery; Julia L Evans; Sandra L Gillam
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-02-03       Impact factor: 2.484

6.  Captivated by thought: "Sticky" thinking leaves traces of perceptual decoupling in task-evoked pupil size.

Authors:  Stefan Huijser; Mathanja Verkaik; Marieke K van Vugt; Niels A Taatgen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Reducing failures of working memory with performance feedback.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

8.  Post-encoding control of working memory enhances processing of relevant information in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Ryan J Brady; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-02-17

9.  Pupillary correlates of lapses of sustained attention.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Resting and Functional Pupil Response Metrics Indicate Features of Reward Sensitivity and ASD in Children.

Authors:  Antoinette Sabatino DiCriscio; Vanessa Troiani
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.