Literature DB >> 34859781

Working memory capacity of crows and monkeys arises from similar neuronal computations.

Lukas Alexander Hahn1, Dmitry Balakhonov1, Erica Fongaro1, Andreas Nieder2, Jonas Rose1.   

Abstract

Complex cognition relies on flexible working memory, which is severely limited in its capacity. The neuronal computations underlying these capacity limits have been extensively studied in humans and in monkeys, resulting in competing theoretical models. We probed the working memory capacity of crows (Corvus corone) in a change detection task, developed for monkeys (Macaca mulatta), while we performed extracellular recordings of the prefrontal-like area nidopallium caudolaterale. We found that neuronal encoding and maintenance of information were affected by item load, in a way that is virtually identical to results obtained from monkey prefrontal cortex. Contemporary neurophysiological models of working memory employ divisive normalization as an important mechanism that may result in the capacity limitation. As these models are usually conceptualized and tested in an exclusively mammalian context, it remains unclear if they fully capture a general concept of working memory or if they are restricted to the mammalian neocortex. Here, we report that carrion crows and macaque monkeys share divisive normalization as a neuronal computation that is in line with mammalian models. This indicates that computational models of working memory developed in the mammalian cortex can also apply to non-cortical associative brain regions of birds.
© 2021, Hahn et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corvus corone; comparative cognition; divisive normalization; neuroscience; working memory capacity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34859781      PMCID: PMC8660017          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.72783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  65 in total

1.  Afferent and efferent connections of the caudolateral neostriatum in the pigeon (Columba livia): a retro- and anterograde pathway tracing study.

Authors:  S Kröner; O Güntürkün
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1999-05-03       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  D J Heeger
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-08

5.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Theta and gamma power increases and alpha/beta power decreases with memory load in an attractor network model.

Authors:  Mikael Lundqvist; Pawel Herman; Anders Lansner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Changing concepts of working memory.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Masud Husain; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 8.  Normalization as a canonical neural computation.

Authors:  Matteo Carandini; David J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Crows Rival Monkeys in Cognitive Capacity.

Authors:  Dmitry Balakhonov; Jonas Rose
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Executive control processes underlying multi-item working memory.

Authors:  Antonio H Lara; Jonathan D Wallis
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  4 in total

1.  Working memory capacity of crows and monkeys arises from similar neuronal computations.

Authors:  Lukas Alexander Hahn; Dmitry Balakhonov; Erica Fongaro; Andreas Nieder; Jonas Rose
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  "Prefrontal" Neuronal Foundations of Visual Asymmetries in Pigeons.

Authors:  Qian Xiao; Onur Güntürkün
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  K-clique percolation in free association networks and the possible mechanism behind the [Formula: see text] law.

Authors:  Olga Valba; Alexander Gorsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Number neurons in the nidopallium of young domestic chicks.

Authors:  Dmitry Kobylkov; Uwe Mayer; Mirko Zanon; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 12.779

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.