Literature DB >> 17209748

Interference from filled delays on visual change detection.

Tal Makovski1, Won Mok Shim, Yuhong V Jiang.   

Abstract

Failure to detect changes to salient visual input across a brief interval has popularized the use of change detection, a paradigm that plays important roles in recent studies of visual perception, short-term memory, and consciousness. Much research has focused on the nature of visual representation for the pre- and postchange displays, yet little is known about how visual change detection is interfered with by events inserted between the pre- and postchange displays. To address this question, we tested change detection of colors, spatial locations, and natural scenes, when the interval between changes was (1) blank, (2) filled with a visual scene, or (3) filled with an auditory word. Participants were asked to either ignore the filled visual or auditory event or attend to it by categorizing it as animate or inanimate. Results showed that the ability to detect visual changes was dramatically impaired by attending to a secondary task during the delay. This interference was significant for auditory as well as for visual interfering events and was invariant to the complexity of the prechange displays. Passive listening produced no interference, whereas passive viewing produced small but significant interference. We conclude that visual change detection relies significantly on central, amodal attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17209748     DOI: 10.1167/6.12.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  24 in total

1.  Are multiple visual short-term memory storages necessary to explain the retro-cue effect?

Authors:  Tal Makovski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

2.  Visual and verbal working memory loads interfere with scene-viewing.

Authors:  Deborah A Cronin; Candace E Peacock; John M Henderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The role of attention in the maintenance of feature bindings in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Andrew Hollingworth; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Distributing versus focusing attention in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Tal Makovsik; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

5.  Re-examining the contribution of visuospatial working memory to inhibition of return.

Authors:  Ana B Vivas; Ioanna Liaromati; Elvira Masoura; Katerina Chatzikallia
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-01-21

6.  Attention modulates maintenance of representations in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Bo-Cheng Kuo; Mark G Stokes; Anna Christina Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  What happens to an individual visual working memory representation when it is interrupted?

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2018-08-01

8.  Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The role of visual working memory in attentive tracking of unique objects.

Authors:  Tal Makovski; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Post-encoding control of working memory enhances processing of relevant information in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Ryan J Brady; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.