Literature DB >> 17227183

The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.

Nash Unsworth1, Randall W Engle.   

Abstract

Studies examining individual differences in working memory capacity have suggested that individuals with low working memory capacities demonstrate impaired performance on a variety of attention and memory tasks compared with individuals with high working memory capacities. This working memory limitation can be conceived of as arising from 2 components: a dynamic attention component (primary memory) and a probabilistic cue-dependent search component (secondary memory). This framework is used to examine previous individual differences studies of working memory capacity, and new evidence is examined on the basis of predictions of the framework to performance on immediate free recall. It is suggested that individual differences in working memory capacity are partially due to the ability to maintain information accessible in primary memory and the ability to search for information from secondary memory. ((c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17227183     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  287 in total

1.  Temporal-contextual processing in working memory: evidence from delayed cued recall and delayed free recall tests.

Authors:  Vanessa M Loaiza; David P McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

2.  Recognition confidence under violated and confirmed memory expectations.

Authors:  Antonio Jaeger; Justin C Cox; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-10-03

3.  Classifying retrieval strategies as a function of working memory.

Authors:  Jenni L Schelble; David J Therriault; M David Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

4.  Drifting from slow to "D'oh!": working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors.

Authors:  Jennifer C McVay; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Martin Greaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

Review 6.  The redundancy of recursion and infinity for natural language.

Authors:  Erkki Luuk; Hendrik Luuk
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-07-23

7.  Executive functioning rating scales: Ecologically valid or construct invalid?

Authors:  Elia F Soto; Michael J Kofler; Leah J Singh; Erica L Wells; Lauren N Irwin; Nicole B Groves; Caroline E Miller
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Aging Impairs Temporal Sensitivity, but not Perceptual Synchrony, Across Modalities.

Authors:  Alexandra N Scurry; Tiziana Vercillo; Alexis Nicholson; Michael Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.286

9.  Contribution of reactive and proactive control to children's working memory performance: Insight from item recall durations in response sequence planning.

Authors:  Nicolas Chevalier; Tiffany D James; Sandra A Wiebe; Jennifer Mize Nelson; Kimberly Andrews Espy
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2014-04-28

10.  Multivariate Relationships Between Cognition and Brain Anatomy Across the Psychosis Spectrum.

Authors:  Amanda L Rodrigue; Jennifer E McDowell; Neeraj Tandon; Matcheri S Keshavan; Carol A Tamminga; Godfrey D Pearlson; John A Sweeney; Robert D Gibbons; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.