Literature DB >> 21972046

Orienting attention to locations in mental representations.

Duncan Edward Astle1, Jennifer Summerfield, Ivan Griffin, Anna Christina Nobre.   

Abstract

Many cognitive processes depend on our ability to hold information in mind, often well beyond the offset of the original sensory input. The capacity of this visual short-term memory (VSTM) is limited to around three to four items. Recent research has demonstrated that the content of VSTM can be modulated by top-down attentional biases. This has been demonstrated using retrodictive spatial cues, termed "retro-cues," which orient subjects' attention to spatial locations within VSTM. In the present article, we tested whether the use of these cues is modulated by memory load and cue delay. There are a number of important conclusions: (1) Top-down biases can operate on very brief iconic traces as well as on older VSTM representations (Exp. 1). (2) When operating within capacity, subjects use the cue to prioritise where they initiate their memory search, rather than to discard uncued items (Exps. 2 and 3). (3) When capacity is exceeded, there is little benefit to top-down biasing relative to a neutral condition; however, unattended items are lost, with there being a substantial cost of invalid spatial cueing (Exp. 3). (4) These costs and benefits of orienting spatial attention differ across iconic memory and VSTM representations when VSTM capacity is exceeded (Exp. 4).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21972046      PMCID: PMC4152722          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0218-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  27 in total

1.  What are the units of visual short-term memory, objects or spatial locations?

Authors:  D Lee; M M Chun
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-02

2.  Change-blindness as a result of 'mudsplashes'.

Authors:  J K O'Regan; R A Rensink; J J Clark
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.

Authors:  Ivan C Griffin; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The where and how of attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory.

Authors:  B R Postle; E Awh; J Jonides; E E Smith; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-07

5.  Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes.

Authors:  Tal Makovski; Rachel Sussman; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: protection or prioritization?

Authors:  Michi Matsukura; Steven J Luck; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-11

7.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.

Authors:  S J Luck; E K Vogel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Detailed sensory memory, sloppy working memory.

Authors:  Ilja G Sligte; Annelinde R E Vandenbroucke; H Steven Scholte; Victor A F Lamme
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-10-21

10.  Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores?

Authors:  Ilja G Sligte; H Steven Scholte; Victor A F Lamme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  41 in total

1.  Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

2.  Real and implied motion at the center of gaze.

Authors:  Alper Açik; Andreas Bartel; Peter König
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Attention to memory: orienting attention to sound object representations.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Claude Alain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-20

4.  Orienting attention in visual working memory requires central capacity: decreased retro-cue effects under dual-task conditions.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.

Authors:  Eren Gunseli; Dirk van Moorselaar; Martijn Meeter; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

6.  Action relevance induces an attentional weighting of representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; J Douglas Crawford; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-04

7.  Quantifying attentional effects on the fidelity and biases of visual working memory in young children.

Authors:  Sylvia B Guillory; Teodora Gliga; Zsuzsa Kaldy
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-11-22

8.  Setting and changing feature priorities in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Zampeta Kalogeropoulou; Akshay V Jagadeesh; Sven Ohl; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

9.  Working memory for stereoscopic depth is limited and imprecise-evidence from a change detection task.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Ke Zhang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

10.  The strategic retention of task-relevant objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.