Literature DB >> 32638291

Cognitive control of working memory but not familiarity in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Emily Kathryn Brown1, Robert R Hampton2.   

Abstract

Directed forgetting paradigms assess cognitive control by determining whether memory accuracy is superior in trials on which subjects were instructed to remember compared with accuracy in trials on which they were instructed to forget. We used a directed forgetting paradigm to compare the extent to which working memory and familiarity are subject to rehearsal-like cognitive control in rhesus monkeys. Monkeys studied a sample image, then saw one of two distinctive cues during a retention interval. The remember cue typically predicted a four-choice match to sample test, for which memory of the sample was critical. The forget cue typically predicted one of five perceptual discrimination tests, matched for accuracy to the memory tests, for which memory of the sample was irrelevant. On rare probe trials, the test type other than the type typically predicted by the cue was presented. When cognitive control of memory was possible, accuracy should have been higher on memory tests following the remember cue than on those following the forget cue. We found that accuracy was higher following the remember cue under conditions that favored working memory (small image set) but was not higher under conditions that favored matching on the basis of relative familiarity (large image set). Working memory, but not familiarity, is subject to cognitive control in rhesus monkeys.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Directed forgetting; Primate cognition; Rehearsal

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32638291      PMCID: PMC7686054          DOI: 10.3758/s13420-020-00432-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  35 in total

1.  Perirhinal cortex removal dissociates two memory systems in matching-to-sample performance in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Robert R Hampton; Elisabeth A Murray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.

Authors:  G A MILLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Move over ANOVA: progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of General Psychiatry.

Authors:  Ralitza Gueorguieva; John H Krystal
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2004-03

Review 4.  The medial temporal lobe memory system.

Authors:  L R Squire; S Zola-Morgan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-09-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Nonverbal working memory of humans and monkeys: rehearsal in the sketchpad?

Authors:  D A Washburn; R S Astur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-03

6.  Mechanisms of working memory disruption by external interference.

Authors:  Wesley C Clapp; Michael T Rubens; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Memory systems interaction in the pigeon: working and reference memory.

Authors:  William A Roberts; Caroline Strang; Krista Macpherson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.478

8.  Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning.

Authors:  M G Packard; J L McGaugh
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) adaptively adjust information seeking in response to information accumulated.

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Alex A Pani; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  One-trial memory and habit contribute independently to matching-to-sample performance in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.231

View more
  3 in total

1.  Interaction of memory systems is controlled by context in both food-storing and non-storing birds.

Authors:  Emily Kathryn Brown; Caroline G Strang; David F Sherry; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Six adult male rhesus monkeys did not learn from the choices of a conspecific shown in videos.

Authors:  Jad Nasrini; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 2.899

3.  Greater dependence on working memory and restricted familiarity in orangutans compared with rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Ryan J Brady; Jennifer M Mickelberg; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.699

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.