Thorsten Sellerer1, Peter B Noël2,3, Manuel Patino4, Anushri Parakh4, Sebastian Ehn2, Sascha Zeiter5, Jasmin A Holz5, Johannes Hammel2, Alexander A Fingerle2,3, Franz Pfeiffer2,3,6, David Maintz5, Ernst J Rummeny3, Daniela Muenzel2,3,4, Dushyant V Sahani4. 1. Chair for Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics and Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, James-Franck-Str. 1, 85748, Garching, Germany. thorsten.sellerer@tum.de. 2. Chair for Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics and Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, James-Franck-Str. 1, 85748, Garching, Germany. 3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 4. Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 6. Institute for Advanced Study, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of imaging performance across dual-energy CT (DECT) platforms, including dual-layer CT (DLCT), rapid-kVp-switching CT (KVSCT) and dual-source CT (DSCT). METHODS: A semi-anthropomorphic abdomen phantom was imaged on these DECT systems. Scans were repeated three times for CTDIvol levels of 10 mGy, 20 mGy, 30 mGy and different fat-simulating extension rings. Over the available range of virtual-monoenergetic images (VMI), noise as well as quantitative accuracy of hounsfield units (HU) and iodine concentrations were evaluated. RESULTS: For all VMI levels, HU values could be determined with high accuracy compared to theoretical values. For KVSCT and DSCT, a noise increase was observed towards lower VMI levels. A patient-size dependent increase in the uncertainty of quantitative iodine concentrations is observed for all platforms. For a medium patient size the iodine concentration root-mean-square deviation at 20 mGy is 0.17 mg/ml (DLCT), 0.30 mg/ml (KVSCT) and 0.77mg/ml (DSCT). CONCLUSION: Noticeable performance differences are observed between investigated DECT systems. Iodine concentrations and VMI HUs are accurately determined across all DECT systems. KVSCT and DLCT deliver slightly more accurate iodine concentration values than DSCT for investigated scenarios. In DLCT, low-noise and high-image contrast at low VMI levels may help to increase diagnostic information in abdominal CT. KEY POINTS: • Current dual-energy CT platforms provide accurate, reliable quantitative information. • Dual-energy CT cross-platform evaluation revealed noticeable performance differences between different systems. • Dual-layer CT offers constant noise levels over the complete energy range.
OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of imaging performance across dual-energy CT (DECT) platforms, including dual-layer CT (DLCT), rapid-kVp-switching CT (KVSCT) and dual-source CT (DSCT). METHODS: A semi-anthropomorphic abdomen phantom was imaged on these DECT systems. Scans were repeated three times for CTDIvol levels of 10 mGy, 20 mGy, 30 mGy and different fat-simulating extension rings. Over the available range of virtual-monoenergetic images (VMI), noise as well as quantitative accuracy of hounsfield units (HU) and iodine concentrations were evaluated. RESULTS: For all VMI levels, HU values could be determined with high accuracy compared to theoretical values. For KVSCT and DSCT, a noise increase was observed towards lower VMI levels. A patient-size dependent increase in the uncertainty of quantitative iodine concentrations is observed for all platforms. For a medium patient size the iodine concentration root-mean-square deviation at 20 mGy is 0.17 mg/ml (DLCT), 0.30 mg/ml (KVSCT) and 0.77mg/ml (DSCT). CONCLUSION: Noticeable performance differences are observed between investigated DECT systems. Iodine concentrations and VMI HUs are accurately determined across all DECT systems. KVSCT and DLCT deliver slightly more accurate iodine concentration values than DSCT for investigated scenarios. In DLCT, low-noise and high-image contrast at low VMI levels may help to increase diagnostic information in abdominal CT. KEY POINTS: • Current dual-energy CT platforms provide accurate, reliable quantitative information. • Dual-energy CT cross-platform evaluation revealed noticeable performance differences between different systems. • Dual-layer CT offers constant noise levels over the complete energy range.
Authors: Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bernd J Wintersperger; Alexander W Leber; Franz von Ziegler; Carsten Rist; Sonja Buhmann; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-05-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Lucía Flors; Carlos Leiva-Salinas; Patrick T Norton; James T Patrie; Klaus D Hagspiel Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: André Euler; Anushri Parakh; Anna L Falkowski; Sebastian Manneck; David Dashti; Bernhard Krauss; Zsolt Szucs-Farkas; Sebastian T Schindera Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Gert Jan Pelgrim; Robbert W van Hamersvelt; Martin J Willemink; Bernhard T Schmidt; Thomas Flohr; Arnold Schilham; Julien Milles; Matthijs Oudkerk; Tim Leiner; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Andreas Sauter; Thomas Koehler; Alexander A Fingerle; Bernhard Brendel; Vivien Richter; Michael Rasper; Ernst J Rummeny; Peter B Noël; Daniela Münzel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anushri Parakh; Simon Lennartz; Chansik An; Prabhakar Rajiah; Benjamin M Yeh; Frank J Simeone; Dushyant V Sahani; Avinash R Kambadakone Journal: Radiographics Date: 2021 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.333