OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the image quality of virtual-monoenergetic-imaging (VMI) from dual-layer dual-energy CT (DLCT) for the assessment of hypovascular liver metastases and its effect on lesion detectability. METHODS: Eighty-one patients with hypovascular-liver-metastases undergoing portal-venous-phase abdominal DLCT were included. Polyenergetic-images (PEI) and VMI at 40-200 keV (VMI40-200, 10-keV interval) were reconstructed. Image noise, tumor-to-liver contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of hepatic parenchyma and metastatic nodules (n = 288) were measured to determine the optimal monoenergetic levels. Two radiologists independently and subjectively assessed the image quality (image contrast, image noise, and diagnostic confidence) of PEI and optimal VMI on 5-point scales to determine the best energy. For 38 patients having up to 10 metastases each with diameters < 25 mm (153 lesions), we compared blindly assessed lesion detectability and conspicuity between PEI and VMI at the best energy. RESULTS: Image noise of VMI40-200 was consistently lower than that of PEI (p < 0.01). Tumor-to-liver contrast and CNR increased as the energy decreased with CNR at VMI40-70 being higher than that observed on PEI (p < 0.01). The highest subjective score for diagnostic confidence was assigned at VMI40 followed by VMI50-70, all of which were significantly better than that of PEI (p < 0.01, kappa = 0.75). Lesion detectability at VMI40 was significantly superior to PEI, especially for lesions with diameters of < 10 mm (p < 0.01, kappa ≥ 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: VMI40-70 provided a better subjective and objective image quality for the evaluation of hypovascular liver metastases, and the lesion detectability was improved with use of VMI40 compared with conventional PEI. KEY POINTS: • DLCT-VMI at 40-70 keV provides a superior subjective and objective image quality compared with conventional PEI for the assessment of hypovascular hepatic metastases during portal venous phase. • Tumor-to-liver contrast and CNR of hypovascular hepatic metastases was maximized at 40 keV without a relevant increase in the image noise. • VMI at 40 keV yields a superior lesion detectability, especially for small (< 1 cm) metastatic nodules compared with conventional PEI.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the image quality of virtual-monoenergetic-imaging (VMI) from dual-layer dual-energy CT (DLCT) for the assessment of hypovascular liver metastases and its effect on lesion detectability. METHODS: Eighty-one patients with hypovascular-liver-metastases undergoing portal-venous-phase abdominal DLCT were included. Polyenergetic-images (PEI) and VMI at 40-200 keV (VMI40-200, 10-keV interval) were reconstructed. Image noise, tumor-to-liver contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of hepatic parenchyma and metastatic nodules (n = 288) were measured to determine the optimal monoenergetic levels. Two radiologists independently and subjectively assessed the image quality (image contrast, image noise, and diagnostic confidence) of PEI and optimal VMI on 5-point scales to determine the best energy. For 38 patients having up to 10 metastases each with diameters < 25 mm (153 lesions), we compared blindly assessed lesion detectability and conspicuity between PEI and VMI at the best energy. RESULTS: Image noise of VMI40-200 was consistently lower than that of PEI (p < 0.01). Tumor-to-liver contrast and CNR increased as the energy decreased with CNR at VMI40-70 being higher than that observed on PEI (p < 0.01). The highest subjective score for diagnostic confidence was assigned at VMI40 followed by VMI50-70, all of which were significantly better than that of PEI (p < 0.01, kappa = 0.75). Lesion detectability at VMI40 was significantly superior to PEI, especially for lesions with diameters of < 10 mm (p < 0.01, kappa ≥ 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: VMI40-70 provided a better subjective and objective image quality for the evaluation of hypovascular liver metastases, and the lesion detectability was improved with use of VMI40 compared with conventional PEI. KEY POINTS: • DLCT-VMI at 40-70 keV provides a superior subjective and objective image quality compared with conventional PEI for the assessment of hypovascular hepatic metastases during portal venous phase. • Tumor-to-liver contrast and CNR of hypovascular hepatic metastases was maximized at 40 keV without a relevant increase in the image noise. • VMI at 40 keV yields a superior lesion detectability, especially for small (< 1 cm) metastatic nodules compared with conventional PEI.
Authors: Kalpana M Kanal; Jonathan H Chung; Jin Wang; Puneet Bhargava; Jennifer R Kohr; William P Shuman; Brent K Stewart Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Anna Darnell; Marco Rengo; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Davide Bellini; Carmen Ayuso; Andrea Laghi Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Sebastian T Schindera; Lisa F Hareter; Stephan Raible; Jaled Charimo Torrente; Oliver Rusch; Andrea B Rosskopf; Daniele Marin; Peter Vock; Zsolt Szucs-Farkas Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Janice Ward; Philip J Robinson; J Ashley Guthrie; Susan Downing; Daniel Wilson; J Peter A Lodge; K Rajedra Prasad; Giles J Toogood; Judith I Wyatt Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-08-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jodie A Christner; Natalie N Braun; Megan C Jacobsen; Rickey E Carter; James M Kofler; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Stefanie Bette; Josua A Decker; Franziska M Braun; Judith Becker; Mark Haerting; Thomas Haeckel; Michael Gebhard; Franka Risch; Piotr Woźnicki; Christian Scheurig-Muenkler; Thomas J Kroencke; Florian Schwarz Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-05-14
Authors: Lucian Beer; Michael Toepker; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Christian Schestak; Anja Dutschke; Martin Schindl; Alexander Wressnegger; Helmut Ringl; Paul Apfaltrer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-03-19 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Scherwin Mahmoudi; Marvin Lange; Lukas Lenga; Ibrahim Yel; Vitali Koch; Christian Booz; Simon Martin; Simon Bernatz; Thomas Vogl; Moritz Albrecht; Jan-Erik Scholtz Journal: BJR Open Date: 2022-05-10