Literature DB >> 33411614

Dual-Energy CT Images: Pearls and Pitfalls.

Anushri Parakh1, Simon Lennartz1, Chansik An1, Prabhakar Rajiah1, Benjamin M Yeh1, Frank J Simeone1, Dushyant V Sahani1, Avinash R Kambadakone1.   

Abstract

Dual-energy CT (DECT) is a tremendous innovation in CT technology that allows creation of numerous imaging datasets by enabling discrete acquisitions at more than one energy level. The wide range of images generated from a single DECT acquisition provides several benefits such as improved lesion detection and characterization, superior determination of material composition, reduction in the dose of iodine, and more robust quantification. Technological advances and the proliferation of various processing methods have led to the availability of diverse vendor-based DECT approaches, each with a different acquisition and image reconstruction process. The images generated from various DECT scanners differ from those from conventional single-energy CT because of differences in their acquisition techniques, material decomposition methods, image reconstruction algorithms, and postprocessing methods. DECT images such as virtual monochromatic images, material density images, and virtual unenhanced images have different imaging appearances, texture features, and quantitative capabilities. This heterogeneity creates challenges in their routine interpretation and has certain associated pitfalls. Some artifacts such as residual iodine on virtual unenhanced images and an appearance of pseudopneumatosis in a gas-distended bowel loop on material-density iodine images are specific to DECT, while others such as pseudoenhancement seen on virtual monochromatic images are also observed at single-energy CT. Recognizing the potential pitfalls associated with DECT is necessary for appropriate and accurate interpretation of the results of this increasingly important imaging tool. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33411614      PMCID: PMC7853765          DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021200102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  71 in total

1.  Dual-energy CT: a phantom comparison of different platforms for abdominal imaging.

Authors:  Thorsten Sellerer; Peter B Noël; Manuel Patino; Anushri Parakh; Sebastian Ehn; Sascha Zeiter; Jasmin A Holz; Johannes Hammel; Alexander A Fingerle; Franz Pfeiffer; David Maintz; Ernst J Rummeny; Daniela Muenzel; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Characterization of Incidental Renal Mass With Dual-Energy CT: Diagnostic Accuracy of Effective Atomic Number Maps for Discriminating Nonenhancing Cysts From Enhancing Masses.

Authors:  Achille Mileto; Brian C Allen; Jason A Pietryga; Alfredo E Farjat; Jessica G Zarzour; Davide Bellini; Lukas Ebner; Desiree E Morgan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Dose Reduction, Series Reduction, and Contrast Load Reduction in Dual-Energy Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Anushri Parakh; Francesco Macri; Dushyant Sahani
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Virtual unenhanced CT images acquired from dual-energy CT urography: accuracy of attenuation values and variation with contrast material phase.

Authors:  V A Sahni; A B Shinagare; S G Silverman
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Adenoma characterization: adrenal protocol with dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Yi Kyung Kim; Byung Kwan Park; Chan Kyo Kim; Sung Yoon Park
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Water/cortical bone decomposition: A new approach in dual energy CT imaging for bone marrow oedema detection. A feasibility study.

Authors:  M Biondi; E Vanzi; G De Otto; F Banci Buonamici; G M Belmonte; L N Mazzoni; A Guasti; S F Carbone; M A Mazzei; A La Penna; E Foderà; D Guerreri; A Maiolino; L Volterrani
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Virtual unenhanced images of the abdomen with second-generation dual-source dual-energy computed tomography: image quality and liver lesion detection.

Authors:  Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Anna Darnell; Napoleón Macías; Juan Ramón Ayuso; Sonia Rodríguez; Jordi Rimola; Mario Pagés; Angeles García-Criado; Marco Rengo; Andrea Laghi; Carmen Ayuso
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 8.  Dual- and Multi-Energy CT: Principles, Technical Approaches, and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Joel G Fletcher
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Dual-Energy CT: Lower Limits of Iodine Detection and Quantification.

Authors:  Megan C Jacobsen; Erik N K Cressman; Eric P Tamm; Dodge L Baluya; Xinhui Duan; Dianna D Cody; Dawid Schellingerhout; Rick R Layman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 29.146

10.  Exploring metal artifact reduction using dual-energy CT with pre-metal and post-metal implant cadaver comparison: are implant specific protocols needed?

Authors:  Ruud H H Wellenberg; Johanna C E Donders; Peter Kloen; Ludo F M Beenen; Roeland P Kleipool; Mario Maas; Geert J Streekstra
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  2 in total

1.  Commentary On: Image Quality Evaluation in Dual Energy CT of the Chest, Abdomen and Pelvis in Obese Patients with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Corey T Jensen
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.081

Review 2.  Dual-energy CT: minimal essentials for radiologists.

Authors:  Fuminari Tatsugami; Toru Higaki; Yuko Nakamura; Yukiko Honda; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.701

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.