Literature DB >> 29968098

Reflection- and Distortion-Source Otoacoustic Emissions: Evidence for Increased Irregularity in the Human Cochlea During Aging.

Carolina Abdala1, Amanda J Ortmann2, Christopher A Shera2.   

Abstract

Previous research on distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) components has hinted at possible differences in the effect of aging on the two basic types of OAEs: those generated by a reflection mechanism in the cochlea and those created by nonlinear distortion (Abdala and Dhar in J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 13:403-421, 2012). This initial work led to the hypothesis that micromechanical irregularity ("roughness") increases in the aging cochlea, perhaps as the result of natural tissue degradation. Increased roughness would boost the backscattering of traveling waves (i.e., reflection emissions) while minimally impacting DPOAEs. To study the relational effect of aging on both types of emissions and address our hypothesis of its origin, we measured reflection- and distortion-type OAEs in 77 human subjects aged 18-76 years. The stimulus-frequency OAE (SFOAE), a reflection emission, and the distortion component of the DPOAE, a nonlinear distortion emission, were recorded at multiple stimulus levels across a four-octave range in all ears. Although the levels of both OAE types decreased with age, the rate of decline in OAE level was consistently greater for DPOAEs than for SFOAEs; that is, SFOAEs are relatively preserved with advancing age. Multiple regression analyses and other controls indicate that aging per se, and not hearing loss, drives this effect. Furthermore, SFOAE generation was simulated using computational modeling to explore the origin of this result. Increasing the amount of mechanical irregularity with age produced an enhancement of SFOAE levels, providing support for the hypothesis that increased intra-cochlear roughness during aging may preserve SFOAE levels. The characteristic aging effect-relatively preserved reflection-emission levels combined with more markedly reduced distortion-emission levels-indicates that SFOAE magnitudes in elderly individuals depend on more than simply the gain of the cochlear amplifier. This relative pattern of OAE decline with age may provide a diagnostic marker for aging-related changes in the cochlea.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DPOAE; SFOAE; aging roughness; emission

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29968098      PMCID: PMC6226410          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-018-0680-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  47 in total

1.  A longitudinal study of changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds as measured in a hearing conservation program.

Authors:  Judi A Lapsley Miller; Lynne Marshall; Laurie M Heller
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Long-term stability of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Edward M Burns
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Age dependence of otoacoustic emissions: the loss of amplitude is primarily caused by age-related hearing loss and not by aging alone.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Katrin Gudmundsdottir; Peter Plinkert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Age-related changes in transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing ears.

Authors:  Y Satoh; J Kanzaki; T O-Uchi; S Yoshihara
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.863

Review 7.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven Zecker; Jonathan Siegel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Evidence for the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  B L Lonsbury-Martin; W M Cutler; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  High frequency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Chelsea M Blankenship; Angela C Garinis; Daniel B Putterman; Marcin Wróblewski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Age Effects on Cochlear Reflectance in Adults.

Authors:  Sara E Fultz; Kenneth I Vaden; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.

Authors:  Tom Maxim; Christopher A Shera; Karolina K Charaziak; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Morphological Immaturity of the Neonatal Organ of Corti and Associated Structures in Humans.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Christopher A Shera; Michelle D Valero; M Charles Liberman; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-12

5.  Link between stimulus otoacoustic emissions fine structure peaks and standing wave resonances in a cochlear model.

Authors:  Haiqi Wen; Julien Meaud
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission (DPOAE) Growth in Aging Ears with Clinically Normal Behavioral Thresholds.

Authors:  Courtney Coburn Glavin; Jonathan Siegel; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-09-30

7.  Characterizing the Relationship Between Reflection and Distortion Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Adults.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-08

8.  Weakened Cochlear Nonlinearity During Human Aging and Perceptual Correlates.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Amanda J Ortmann; Yeini C Guardia
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Swept-Tone Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Human Newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Yeini Guardia
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

10.  Extended high frequency hearing and speech perception implications in adults and children.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Brian B Monson; David R Moore; Sumitrajit Dhar; Beverly A Wright; Kevin J Munro; Lina Motlagh Zadeh; Chelsea M Blankenship; Samantha M Stiepan; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.208

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.