Literature DB >> 30656353

Efficient genetic value prediction using incomplete omics data.

Matthias Westhues1, Claas Heuer2,3, Georg Thaller2, Rohan Fernando4, Albrecht E Melchinger5.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Covering a subset of individuals with a quantitative predictor, while imputing records for all others using pedigree or genomic data, could improve the precision of predictions while controlling for costs. Predicting genetic values with high accuracy is pivotal for effective candidate selection in animal and plant breeding. Novel 'omics'-based predictors have been shown to improve upon established genome-based predictions of important complex traits but require laborious and expensive assays. As a consequence, there are various datasets with full genetic marker coverage of all studied individuals but incomplete coverage with other 'omics' data. In animal breeding, single-step prediction was introduced to efficiently combine pedigree information, collected on a large number of animals, with genomic information, collected on a smaller subset of animals, for breeding value estimation without bias. Using two maize datasets of inbred lines and hybrids, we show that the single-step framework facilitates imputing transcriptomic data, boosting forecasts when their predictive ability exceeds that of pedigree or genomic data. Our results suggest that covering only a subset of inbred lines with 'omics' predictors and imputing all others using pedigree or genomic data could enable breeders to improve trait predictions while keeping costs under control. Employing 'omics' predictors could particularly improve candidate selection in hybrid breeding because the success of forecasts is a strongly convex function of predictive ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30656353     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-018-03273-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  45 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Normalization of cDNA microarray data.

Authors:  Gordon K Smyth; Terry Speed
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  A comparison of background correction methods for two-colour microarrays.

Authors:  Matthew E Ritchie; Jeremy Silver; Alicia Oshlack; Melissa Holmes; Dileepa Diyagama; Andrew Holloway; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values.

Authors:  D Habier; R L Fernando; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.

Authors:  P M VanRaden; C P Van Tassell; G R Wiggans; T S Sonstegard; R D Schnabel; J F Taylor; F S Schenkel
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals.

Authors:  Brian L Browning; Sharon R Browning
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Genetic interactions between polymorphisms that affect gene expression in yeast.

Authors:  Rachel B Brem; John D Storey; Jacqueline Whittle; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P J Bowman; A J Chamberlain; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.034

View more
  4 in total

1.  Incorporating Omics Data in Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Johannes W R Martini; Ning Gao; José Crossa
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Single-step genomic prediction of fruit-quality traits using phenotypic records of non-genotyped relatives in citrus.

Authors:  Atsushi Imai; Takeshi Kuniga; Terutaka Yoshioka; Keisuke Nonaka; Nobuhito Mitani; Hiroshi Fukamachi; Naofumi Hiehata; Masashi Yamamoto; Takeshi Hayashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Merging Genomics and Transcriptomics for Predicting Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Wheat.

Authors:  Sebastian Michel; Christian Wagner; Tetyana Nosenko; Barbara Steiner; Mina Samad-Zamini; Maria Buerstmayr; Klaus Mayer; Hermann Buerstmayr
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Multi-omics-based prediction of hybrid performance in canola.

Authors:  Dominic Knoch; Christian R Werner; Rhonda C Meyer; David Riewe; Amine Abbadi; Sophie Lücke; Rod J Snowdon; Thomas Altmann
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.699

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.