Literature DB >> 31595337

Genomic prediction with multiple biparental families.

Pedro C Brauner1, Dominik Müller1, Willem S Molenaar1, Albrecht E Melchinger2.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: For genomic prediction within biparental families using multiple biparental families, combined training sets comprising full-sibs from the same family and half-sib families are recommended to reach high and robust prediction accuracy, whereas inclusion of unrelated families is risky and can have negative effects. In recycling breeding, where elite inbreds are recombined to generate new source material, genomic and phenotypic information from lines of numerous biparental families (BPFs) is commonly available for genomic prediction (GP). For each BPF with a large number of candidates in the prediction set (PS), the training set (TS) can be composed of lines from the same full-sib family or multiple related and unrelated families to increase the TS size. GP was applied to BPFs generated in silico and from two published experiments to evaluate the prediction accuracy ([Formula: see text]) of different TS compositions. We compared [Formula: see text] for individual pairs of BPFs using as TS either full-sib, half-sib, or unrelated BPFs. While full-sibs yielded highly positive [Formula: see text] and half-sibs also mostly positive [Formula: see text] values, unrelated families had often negative [Formula: see text], and including these families in a combined TS reduced [Formula: see text]. By simulations, we demonstrated that optimized TS compositions exist, yielding 5-10% higher [Formula: see text] than the TS including all available BPFs. However, identification of poorly predictive families and finding the optimal TS composition with various quantitative-genetic parameters estimated from available data was not successful. Therefore, we suggest omitting unrelated families and combining in the TS full-sib and few half-sib families produced by specific mating designs, with a medium number (~ 50) of genotypes per family. This helps in balancing high [Formula: see text] in GP with a sufficient effective population size of the entire breeding program for securing high short- and long-term selection progress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31595337     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-019-03445-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  31 in total

1.  The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Beatriz Villanueva; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 3.  Genomic prediction in animals and plants: simulation of data, validation, reporting, and benchmarking.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives.

Authors:  José Crossa; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Jaime Cuevas; Osval Montesinos-López; Diego Jarquín; Gustavo de Los Campos; Juan Burgueño; Juan M González-Camacho; Sergio Pérez-Elizalde; Yoseph Beyene; Susanne Dreisigacker; Ravi Singh; Xuecai Zhang; Manje Gowda; Manish Roorkiwal; Jessica Rutkoski; Rajeev K Varshney
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 18.313

5.  Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle.

Authors:  A P W de Roos; B J Hayes; R J Spelman; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genomic Prediction Within and Among Doubled-Haploid Libraries from Maize Landraces.

Authors:  Pedro C Brauner; Dominik Müller; Pascal Schopp; Juliane Böhm; Eva Bauer; Chris-Carolin Schön; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes.

Authors:  Samuel A Clark; John M Hickey; Hans D Daetwyler; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Optimization of genomic selection training populations with a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  Deniz Akdemir; Julio I Sanchez; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Design of training populations for selective phenotyping in genomic prediction.

Authors:  Deniz Akdemir; Julio Isidro-Sánchez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Beatriz Villanueva; John A Woolliams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Building a Calibration Set for Genomic Prediction, Characteristics to Be Considered, and Optimization Approaches.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Exploiting genetic diversity in two European maize landraces for improving Gibberella ear rot resistance using genomic tools.

Authors:  David Sewordor Gaikpa; Bettina Kessel; Thomas Presterl; Milena Ouzunova; Ana L Galiano-Carneiro; Manfred Mayer; Albrecht E Melchinger; Chris-Carolin Schön; Thomas Miedaner
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Genomic selection for spot blotch in bread wheat breeding panels, full-sibs and half-sibs and index-based selection for spot blotch, heading and plant height.

Authors:  Philomin Juliana; Xinyao He; Jesse Poland; Krishna K Roy; Paritosh K Malaker; Vinod K Mishra; Ramesh Chand; Sandesh Shrestha; Uttam Kumar; Chandan Roy; Navin C Gahtyari; Arun K Joshi; Ravi P Singh; Pawan K Singh
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.574

4.  Training Population Optimization for Genomic Selection in Miscanthus.

Authors:  Marcus O Olatoye; Lindsay V Clark; Nicholas R Labonte; Hongxu Dong; Maria S Dwiyanti; Kossonou G Anzoua; Joe E Brummer; Bimal K Ghimire; Elena Dzyubenko; Nikolay Dzyubenko; Larisa Bagmet; Andrey Sabitov; Pavel Chebukin; Katarzyna Głowacka; Kweon Heo; Xiaoli Jin; Hironori Nagano; Junhua Peng; Chang Y Yu; Ji H Yoo; Hua Zhao; Stephen P Long; Toshihiko Yamada; Erik J Sacks; Alexander E Lipka
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 5.  An Overview of Key Factors Affecting Genomic Selection for Wheat Quality Traits.

Authors:  Ivana Plavšin; Jerko Gunjača; Zlatko Šatović; Hrvoje Šarčević; Marko Ivić; Krešimir Dvojković; Dario Novoselović
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-11

6.  The performance of phenomic selection depends on the genetic architecture of the target trait.

Authors:  Xintian Zhu; Hans Peter Maurer; Mario Jenz; Volker Hahn; Arno Ruckelshausen; Willmar L Leiser; Tobias Würschum
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Genomic prediction of cotton fibre quality and yield traits using Bayesian regression methods.

Authors:  Zitong Li; Shiming Liu; Warren Conaty; Qian-Hao Zhu; Philippe Moncuquet; Warwick Stiller; Iain Wilson
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.832

8.  Strategies for Effective Use of Genomic Information in Crop Breeding Programs Serving Africa and South Asia.

Authors:  Nicholas Santantonio; Sikiru Adeniyi Atanda; Yoseph Beyene; Rajeev K Varshney; Michael Olsen; Elizabeth Jones; Manish Roorkiwal; Manje Gowda; Chellapilla Bharadwaj; Pooran M Gaur; Xuecai Zhang; Kate Dreher; Claudio Ayala-Hernández; Jose Crossa; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Abhishek Rathore; Star Yanxin Gao; Susan McCouch; Kelly R Robbins
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Intercontinental trials reveal stable QTL for Northern corn leaf blight resistance in Europe and in Brazil.

Authors:  Ana L Galiano-Carneiro; Bettina Kessel; Thomas Presterl; Thomas Miedaner
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Unraveling the potential of phenomic selection within and among diverse breeding material of maize (Zea mays L.).

Authors:  Thea Mi Weiß; Xintian Zhu; Willmar L Leiser; Dongdong Li; Wenxin Liu; Wolfgang Schipprack; Albrecht E Melchinger; Volker Hahn; Tobias Würschum
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.154

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.