Literature DB >> 30382311

Modeling copy number variation in the genomic prediction of maize hybrids.

Danilo Hottis Lyra1,2, Giovanni Galli3, Filipe Couto Alves3, Ítalo Stefanine Correia Granato3, Miriam Suzane Vidotti3, Massaine Bandeira E Sousa3, Júlia Silva Morosini3, José Crossa4, Roberto Fritsche-Neto3.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Our study indicates that copy variants may play an essential role in the phenotypic variation of complex traits in maize hybrids. Moreover, predicting hybrid phenotypes by combining additive-dominance effects with copy variants has the potential to be a viable predictive model. Non-additive effects resulting from the actions of multiple loci may influence trait variation in single-cross hybrids. In addition, complementation of allelic variation could be a valuable contributor to hybrid genetic variation, especially when crossing inbred lines with higher contents of copy gains. With this in mind, we aimed (1) to study the association between copy number variation (CNV) and hybrid phenotype, and (2) to compare the predictive ability (PA) of additive and additive-dominance genomic best linear unbiased prediction model when combined with the effects of CNV in two datasets of maize hybrids (USP and HELIX). In the USP dataset, we observed a significant negative phenotypic correlation of low magnitude between copy number loss and plant height, revealing a tendency that more copy losses lead to lower plants. In the same set, when CNV was combined with the additive plus dominance effects, the PA significantly increased only for plant height under low nitrogen. In this case, CNV effects explicitly capture relatedness between individuals and add extra information to the model. In the HELIX dataset, we observed a pronounced difference in PA between additive (0.50) and additive-dominance (0.71) models for predicting grain yield, suggesting a significant contribution of dominance. We conclude that copy variants may play an essential role in the phenotypic variation of complex traits in maize hybrids, although the inclusion of CNVs into datasets does not return significant gains concerning PA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30382311     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-018-3215-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  86 in total

1.  Integrating patterns of polymorphism at SNPs and STRs.

Authors:  Bret A Payseur; Asher D Cutter
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  A unified model for functional and statistical epistasis and its application in quantitative trait Loci analysis.

Authors:  José M Alvarez-Castro; Orjan Carlborg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals.

Authors:  Brian L Browning; Sharon R Browning
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Integrated detection and population-genetic analysis of SNPs and copy number variation.

Authors:  Steven A McCarroll; Finny G Kuruvilla; Joshua M Korn; Simon Cawley; James Nemesh; Alec Wysoker; Michael H Shapero; Paul I W de Bakker; Julian B Maller; Andrew Kirby; Amanda L Elliott; Melissa Parkin; Earl Hubbell; Teresa Webster; Rui Mei; James Veitch; Patrick J Collins; Robert Handsaker; Steve Lincoln; Marcia Nizzari; John Blume; Keith W Jones; Rich Rava; Mark J Daly; Stacey B Gabriel; David Altshuler
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Linkage disequilibrium between STRPs and SNPs across the human genome.

Authors:  Bret A Payseur; Michael Place; James L Weber
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Accuracy of genotypic value predictions for marker-based selection in biparental plant populations.

Authors:  Robenzon E Lorenzana; Rex Bernardo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Allelic genome structural variations in maize detected by array comparative genome hybridization.

Authors:  André Beló; Mary K Beatty; David Hondred; Kevin A Fengler; Bailin Li; Antoni Rafalski
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Boron-toxicity tolerance in barley arising from efflux transporter amplification.

Authors:  Tim Sutton; Ute Baumann; Julie Hayes; Nicholas C Collins; Bu-Jun Shi; Thorsten Schnurbusch; Alison Hay; Gwenda Mayo; Margaret Pallotta; Mark Tester; Peter Langridge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Maize inbreds exhibit high levels of copy number variation (CNV) and presence/absence variation (PAV) in genome content.

Authors:  Nathan M Springer; Kai Ying; Yan Fu; Tieming Ji; Cheng-Ting Yeh; Yi Jia; Wei Wu; Todd Richmond; Jacob Kitzman; Heidi Rosenbaum; A Leonardo Iniguez; W Brad Barbazuk; Jeffrey A Jeddeloh; Daniel Nettleton; Patrick S Schnable
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  3 in total

1.  High throughput genotyping of structural variations in a complex plant genome using an original Affymetrix® axiom® array.

Authors:  Clément Mabire; Jorge Duarte; Aude Darracq; Ali Pirani; Hélène Rimbert; Delphine Madur; Valérie Combes; Clémentine Vitte; Sébastien Praud; Nathalie Rivière; Johann Joets; Jean-Philippe Pichon; Stéphane D Nicolas
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 2.  How the pan-genome is changing crop genomics and improvement.

Authors:  Rafael Della Coletta; Yinjie Qiu; Shujun Ou; Matthew B Hufford; Candice N Hirsch
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 13.583

3.  Heterotic quantitative trait loci analysis and genomic prediction of seedling biomass-related traits in maize triple testcross populations.

Authors:  Tifu Zhang; Lu Jiang; Long Ruan; Yiliang Qian; Shuaiqiang Liang; Feng Lin; Haiyan Lu; Huixue Dai; Han Zhao
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.993

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.