Literature DB >> 31641024

Transcriptome-Based Prediction of Complex Traits in Maize.

Christina B Azodi1,2, Jeremy Pardo1,3, Robert VanBuren3,4, Gustavo de Los Campos5, Shin-Han Shiu6,2,7.   

Abstract

The ability to predict traits from genome-wide sequence information (i.e., genomic prediction) has improved our understanding of the genetic basis of complex traits and transformed breeding practices. Transcriptome data may also be useful for genomic prediction. However, it remains unclear how well transcript levels can predict traits, particularly when traits are scored at different development stages. Using maize (Zea mays) genetic markers and transcript levels from seedlings to predict mature plant traits, we found that transcript and genetic marker models have similar performance. When the transcripts and genetic markers with the greatest weights (i.e., the most important) in those models were used in one joint model, performance increased. Furthermore, genetic markers important for predictions were not close to or identified as regulatory variants for important transcripts. These findings demonstrate that transcript levels are useful for predicting traits and that their predictive power is not simply due to genetic variation in the transcribed genomic regions. Finally, genetic marker models identified only 1 of 14 benchmark flowering-time genes, while transcript models identified 5. These data highlight that, in addition to being useful for genomic prediction, transcriptome data can provide a link between traits and variation that cannot be readily captured at the sequence level.
© 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31641024      PMCID: PMC6961623          DOI: 10.1105/tpc.19.00332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell        ISSN: 1040-4651            Impact factor:   11.277


  43 in total

1.  TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples.

Authors:  Peter J Bradbury; Zhiwu Zhang; Dallas E Kroon; Terry M Casstevens; Yogesh Ramdoss; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Beyond Genomic Prediction: Combining Different Types of omics Data Can Improve Prediction of Hybrid Performance in Maize.

Authors:  Tobias A Schrag; Matthias Westhues; Wolfgang Schipprack; Felix Seifert; Alexander Thiemann; Stefan Scholten; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The extent of linkage disequilibrium in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Magnus Nordborg; Justin O Borevitz; Joy Bergelson; Charles C Berry; Joanne Chory; Jenny Hagenblad; Martin Kreitman; Julin N Maloof; Tina Noyes; Peter J Oefner; Eli A Stahl; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 4.  Flowering time regulation: photoperiod- and temperature-sensing in leaves.

Authors:  Young Hun Song; Shogo Ito; Takato Imaizumi
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 18.313

5.  Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution.

Authors:  Carolin Strobl; Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Achim Zeileis; Torsten Hothorn
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Application of high-dimensional feature selection: evaluation for genomic prediction in man.

Authors:  M L Bermingham; R Pong-Wong; A Spiliopoulou; C Hayward; I Rudan; H Campbell; A F Wright; J F Wilson; F Agakov; P Navarro; C S Haley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Robust phenotype prediction from gene expression data using differential shrinkage of co-regulated genes.

Authors:  Kourosh Zarringhalam; David Degras; Christoph Brockel; Daniel Ziemek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Prediction of years of life after diagnosis of breast cancer using omics and omic-by-treatment interactions.

Authors:  Agustín González-Reymúndez; Gustavo de Los Campos; Lucía Gutiérrez; Sophia Y Lunt; Ana I Vazquez
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Shrinkage estimation of the realized relationship matrix.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Endelman; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Genetic Regulation of Transcriptional Variation in Natural Arabidopsis thaliana Accessions.

Authors:  Yanjun Zan; Xia Shen; Simon K G Forsberg; Örjan Carlborg
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  22 in total

1.  Predicting Adult Complex Traits from Early Development Transcript Data in Maize.

Authors:  Sunil K Kenchanmane Raju
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: identification and optimisation of factors influencing prediction accuracy and comparison to genomic selection.

Authors:  Pauline Robert; Jérôme Auzanneau; Ellen Goudemand; François-Xavier Oury; Bernard Rolland; Emmanuel Heumez; Sophie Bouchet; Jacques Le Gouis; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Genomic prediction and QTL mapping of root system architecture and above-ground agronomic traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.) with a multitrait index and Bayesian networks.

Authors:  Santosh Sharma; Shannon R M Pinson; David R Gealy; Jeremy D Edwards
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: prediction of the genotype-by-environment interaction in multi-environment breeding trials.

Authors:  Pauline Robert; Ellen Goudemand; Jérôme Auzanneau; François-Xavier Oury; Bernard Rolland; Emmanuel Heumez; Sophie Bouchet; Antoine Caillebotte; Tristan Mary-Huard; Jacques Le Gouis; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.574

5.  NeuralLasso: Neural Networks Meet Lasso in Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Boby Mathew; Andreas Hauptmann; Jens Léon; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Incorporating Omics Data in Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Johannes W R Martini; Ning Gao; José Crossa
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

7.  Prediction of complex phenotypes using the Drosophila melanogaster metabolome.

Authors:  Palle Duun Rohde; Torsten Nygaard Kristensen; Pernille Sarup; Joaquin Muñoz; Anders Malmendal
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 8.  Improving Genomic Prediction Using High-Dimensional Secondary Phenotypes.

Authors:  Bader Arouisse; Tom P J M Theeuwen; Fred A van Eeuwijk; Willem Kruijer
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Transcriptome Analysis of Seed Weight Plasticity in Brassica napus.

Authors:  Javier Canales; José Verdejo; Gabriela Carrasco-Puga; Francisca M Castillo; Anita Arenas-M; Daniel F Calderini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Genetic Improvement in Sunflower Breeding-Integrated Omics Approach.

Authors:  Milan Jocković; Siniša Jocić; Sandra Cvejić; Ana Marjanović-Jeromela; Jelena Jocković; Aleksandra Radanović; Dragana Miladinović
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.