Literature DB >> 32815548

Genomic predictions for enteric methane production are improved by metabolome and microbiome data in sheep (Ovis aries).

Elizabeth M Ross1, Ben J Hayes1, David Tucker2, Jude Bond2, Stuart E Denman3, Victor Hutton Oddy2.   

Abstract

Methane production from rumen methanogenesis contributes approximately 71% of greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector. This study has performed genomic predictions for methane production from 99 sheep across 3 yr using a residual methane phenotype that is log methane yield corrected for live weight, rumen volume, and feed intake. Using genomic relationships, the prediction accuracies (as determined by the correlation between predicted and observed residual methane production) ranged from 0.058 to 0.220 depending on the time point being predicted. The best linear unbiased prediction algorithm was then applied to relationships between animals that were built on the rumen metabolome and microbiome. Prediction accuracies for the metabolome-based relationships for the two available time points were 0.254 and 0.132; the prediction accuracy for the first microbiome time point was 0.142. The second microbiome time point could not successfully predict residual methane production. When the metabolomic relationships were added to the genomic relationships, the accuracy of predictions increased to 0.274 (from 0.201 when only the genomic relationship was used) and 0.158 (from 0.081 when only the genomic relationship was used) for the two time points, respectively. When the microbiome relationships from the first time point were added to the genomic relationships, the maximum prediction accuracy increased to 0.247 (from 0.216 when only the genomic relationship was used), which was achieved by giving the genomic relationships 10 times more weighting than the microbiome relationships. These accuracies were higher than the genomic, metabolomic, and microbiome relationship matrixes achieved alone when identical sets of animals were used.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  metabolome; methane; microbiome; prediction

Year:  2020        PMID: 32815548      PMCID: PMC7751162          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  24 in total

Review 1.  Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes.

Authors:  Michael E Goddard; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Linkage disequilibrium over short physical distances measured in sheep using a high-density SNP chip.

Authors:  James W Kijas; Laercio Porto-Neto; Sonja Dominik; Antonio Reverter; Rowan Bunch; Russell McCulloch; Ben J Hayes; Rudiger Brauning; John McEwan
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Genomic heritabilities and genomic estimated breeding values for methane traits in Angus cattle.

Authors:  B J Hayes; K A Donoghue; C M Reich; B A Mason; T Bird-Gardiner; R M Herd; P F Arthur
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Genomewide association study of methane emissions in Angus beef cattle with validation in dairy cattle.

Authors:  C I V Manzanilla-Pech; Y De Haas; B J Hayes; R F Veerkamp; M Khansefid; K A Donoghue; P F Arthur; J E Pryce
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Heritability estimates for enteric methane emissions from Holstein cattle measured using noninvasive methods.

Authors:  Jan Lassen; Peter Løvendahl
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes.

Authors:  Samuel A Clark; John M Hickey; Hans D Daetwyler; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Methane Inhibition Alters the Microbial Community, Hydrogen Flow, and Fermentation Response in the Rumen of Cattle.

Authors:  Gonzalo Martinez-Fernandez; Stuart E Denman; Chunlei Yang; Jane Cheung; Makoto Mitsumori; Christopher S McSweeney
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Host genetics influence the rumen microbiota and heritable rumen microbial features associate with feed efficiency in cattle.

Authors:  Fuyong Li; Changxi Li; Yanhong Chen; Junhong Liu; Chunyan Zhang; Barry Irving; Carolyn Fitzsimmons; Graham Plastow; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 14.650

9.  Shrinkage estimation of the realized relationship matrix.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Endelman; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Heritability estimates of methane emissions from sheep.

Authors:  C S Pinares-Patiño; S M Hickey; E A Young; K G Dodds; S MacLean; G Molano; E Sandoval; H Kjestrup; R Harland; C Hunt; N K Pickering; J C McEwan
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  The OMICS of methane emissions.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

Review 2.  Metagenomic Predictions: A Review 10 years on.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ross; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Quantification of cytosol and membrane proteins in rumen epithelium of sheep with low or high CH4 emission phenotype.

Authors:  J J Bond; A J Donaldson; S Woodgate; K S Kamath; M J Mckay; D Wheeler; D Tucker; V H Oddy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.