Literature DB >> 12498947

Experimental evaluation of indicators of nonlinearity for use in ultrasound transducer characterizations.

Timothy A Bigelow1, William D O'Brien.   

Abstract

Because the number of applications for medical ultrasonic devices continue to increase and, hence, the number of diagnostic ultrasound (US) systems increase, there is a need to reliably characterize the sources in terms of their output pressures. Currently, the transducers are characterized by making pressure measurements in water for every voltage range applied to the source and, then, linearly derate the measured pressure values to estimate the derated acoustic pressure levels. The process is time-consuming and inaccuracies are introduced in the derating process due to nonlinear effects. Therefore, there is a need to find an indicator of nonlinearity that could classify the measured pressure waveform as either linear, where the derating procedure would yield an accurate derated acoustic pressure estimate, or nonlinear, where the derating process would fail. Eight different indicators of nonlinearity were evaluated experimentally using spherically focused US transducers. The transducers were selected to test the indicator sensitivity to frequency (3 to 8 MHz), f-number (1 and 2), and transducer diameter (1.905 and 5.08 cm). Sensitivity to drive voltage conditions was also tested by exciting one of the transducers with pulses of different duration and phase. None of the eight nonlinearity indicators yielded consistent results. The lack of consistency resulted from the competing effects of nonlinear absorption and asymmetrical distortion, which have yet to be combined into a unified theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12498947     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00610-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  8 in total

1.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part I: Spatiotemporal Transfer Function and Graphical Guide.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Variation of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound (HITU) Pressure Field Characterization: Effects of Hydrophone Choice, Nonlinearity, Spatial Averaging and Complex Deconvolution.

Authors:  Yunbo Liu; Keith A Wear; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part II: Validation for ARFI and Pulsed Doppler Waveforms.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Aoife M Ivory; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts in Hydrophone Measurements of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound: An Inverse Filter Approach.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Samuel M Howard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  FOCUSING OF HIGH POWER ULTRASOUND BEAMS AND LIMITING VALUES OF SHOCK WAVE PARAMETERS.

Authors:  O V Bessonova; V A Khokhlova; M R Bailey; M S Canney; L A Crum
Journal:  Acoust Phys       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 0.856

7.  Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part II: Experimental Validation.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Pressure Pulse Distortion by Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones due to Nonuniform Sensitivity.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Yunbo Liu; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.725

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.