Literature DB >> 28549826

Serial Dependence across Perception, Attention, and Memory.

Anastasia Kiyonaga1, Jason M Scimeca2, Daniel P Bliss2, David Whitney2.   

Abstract

Information that has been recently perceived or remembered can bias current processing. This has been viewed as both a corrupting (e.g., proactive interference in short-term memory) and stabilizing (e.g., serial dependence in perception) phenomenon. We hypothesize that this bias is a generally adaptive aspect of brain function that leads to occasionally maladaptive outcomes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  proactive interference; serial dependence; working memory

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28549826      PMCID： PMC5516910          DOI： 10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN： 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  15 in total

Review 1.  Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory.

Authors:  J Jonides; D E Nee
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 2.  Expectation in perceptual decision making: neural and computational mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  An interference model of visual working memory.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Hsuan-Yu Lin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  The cognitive neuroscience of working memory.

Authors:  Mark D'Esposito; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Ghosts in the Machine II: Neural Correlates of Memory Interference from the Previous Trial.

Authors:  Charalampos Papadimitriou; Robert L White; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

7.  Serial dependence in the perception of faces.

Authors:  Alina Liberman; Jason Fischer; David Whitney
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Distributed Patterns of Brain Activity that Lead to Forgetting.

Authors:  Ilke Oztekin; David Badre
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  'Activity-silent' working memory in prefrontal cortex: a dynamic coding framework.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Different coding strategies for the perception of stable and changeable facial attributes.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379
View more
  48 in total

1.  A Flexible Model of Working Memory.

Authors:  Flora Bouchacourt; Timothy J Buschman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Probabilistic Representation in Human Visual Cortex Reflects Uncertainty in Serial Decisions.

Authors:  Ruben S van Bergen; Janneke F M Jehee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Serial dependence in position occurs at the time of perception.

Authors:  Mauro Manassi; Alina Liberman; Anna Kosovicheva; Kathy Zhang; David Whitney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

4.  Optimizing perception: Attended and ignored stimuli create opposing perceptual biases.

Authors:  Mohsen Rafiei; Sabrina Hansmann-Roth; David Whitney; Árni Kristjánsson; Andrey Chetverikov
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Serial dependence in the perception of visual variance.

Authors:  Marta Suárez-Pinilla; Anil K Seth; Warrick Roseboom
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Distraction in Visual Working Memory: Resistance is Not Futile.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Lorenc; Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Rotational dynamics reduce interference between sensory and memory representations.

Authors:  Alexandra Libby; Timothy J Buschman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Distraction biases working memory for faces.

Authors:  Remington Mallett; Anurima Mummaneni; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

9.  Working memory prioritization impacts neural recovery from distraction.

Authors:  Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Visual recency bias is explained by a mixture model of internal representations.

Authors:  Kristjan Kalm; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.240
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.