Literature DB >> 27114176

Ghosts in the Machine II: Neural Correlates of Memory Interference from the Previous Trial.

Charalampos Papadimitriou1, Robert L White2, Lawrence H Snyder1.   

Abstract

Previous memoranda interfere with working memory. For example, spatial memories are biased toward locations memorized on the previous trial. We predicted, based on attractor network models of memory, that activity in the frontal eye fields (FEFs) encoding a previous target location can persist into the subsequent trial and that this ghost will then bias the readout of the current target. Contrary to this prediction, we find that FEF memory representations appear biased away from (not toward) the previous target location. The behavioral and neural data can be reconciled by a model in which receptive fields of memory neurons converge toward remembered locations, much as receptive fields converge toward attended locations. Convergence increases the resources available to encode the relevant memoranda and decreases overall error in the network, but the residual convergence from the previous trial can give rise to an attractive behavioral bias on the next trial.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  attractor network models; frontal eye fields; proactive interference; receptive field remapping; spatial working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27114176      PMCID: PMC6059123          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  33 in total

1.  Composition and topographic organization of signals sent from the frontal eye field to the superior colliculus.

Authors:  M A Sommer; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Population vector analysis of primate prefrontal activity during spatial working memory.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Takeda; Shintaro Funahashi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Ghosts in the machine: memory interference from the previous trial.

Authors:  Charalampos Papadimitriou; Afreen Ferdoash; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Bump attractor dynamics in prefrontal cortex explains behavioral precision in spatial working memory.

Authors:  Klaus Wimmer; Duane Q Nykamp; Christos Constantinidis; Albert Compte
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Primate frontal eye fields. I. Single neurons discharging before saccades.

Authors:  C J Bruce; M E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Neural integration of movement: role of motor cortex in reaching.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Visuospatial versus visuomotor activity in the premotor and prefrontal cortex of a primate.

Authors:  G di Pellegrino; S P Wise
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Neuron activity related to short-term memory.

Authors:  J M Fuster; G E Alexander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Frontal eye field sends delay activity related to movement, memory, and vision to the superior colliculus.

Authors:  M A Sommer; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The peri-saccadic perception of objects and space.

Authors:  Fred H Hamker; Marc Zirnsak; Dirk Calow; Markus Lappe
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  13 in total

1.  Serial Dependence across Perception, Attention, and Memory.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Jason M Scimeca; Daniel P Bliss; David Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Trial-to-Trial Variability of Spiking Delay Activity in Prefrontal Cortex Constrains Burst-Coding Models of Working Memory.

Authors:  Daming Li; Christos Constantinidis; John D Murray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A key role of orientation in the coding of visual motion direction.

Authors:  Jongmin Moon; Duje Tadin; Oh-Sang Kwon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-09-26

4.  Attractive serial dependence overcomes repulsive neuronal adaptation.

Authors:  Timothy C Sheehan; John T Serences
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 9.593

5.  Serial dependence revealed in history-dependent perceptual templates.

Authors:  Yuki Murai; David Whitney
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 10.900

Review 6.  Balancing Flexibility and Interference in Working Memory.

Authors:  Timothy J Buschman
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 7.745

7.  Interplay between persistent activity and activity-silent dynamics in the prefrontal cortex underlies serial biases in working memory.

Authors:  Joao Barbosa; Heike Stein; Rebecca L Martinez; Adrià Galan-Gadea; Sihai Li; Josep Dalmau; Kirsten C S Adam; Josep Valls-Solé; Christos Constantinidis; Albert Compte
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Synaptic augmentation in a cortical circuit model reproduces serial dependence in visual working memory.

Authors:  Daniel P Bliss; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Synaptic mechanisms of interference in working memory.

Authors:  Zachary P Kilpatrick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Serial dependence is absent at the time of perception but increases in visual working memory.

Authors:  Daniel P Bliss; Jerome J Sun; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.