Literature DB >> 33397602

Distraction in Visual Working Memory: Resistance is Not Futile.

Elizabeth S Lorenc1, Remington Mallett2, Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock2.   

Abstract

Over half a century of research focused on understanding how working memory is capacity constrained has overshadowed the fact that it is also remarkably resistant to interference. Protecting goal-relevant information from distraction is a cornerstone of cognitive function that involves a multifaceted collection of control processes and storage mechanisms. Here, we discuss recent advances in cognitive psychology and neuroscience that have produced new insights into the nature of visual working memory and its ability to resist distraction. We propose that distraction resistance should be an explicit component in any model of working memory and that understanding its behavioral and neural correlates is essential for building a comprehensive understanding of real-world memory function.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distraction; forgetting; interference; resilience; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33397602      PMCID: PMC7878345          DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  140 in total

Review 1.  The psychophysics of perceptual memory.

Authors:  S Magnussen; M W Greenlee
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1999

2.  A theory of working memory without consciousness or sustained activity.

Authors:  Darinka Trübutschek; Sébastien Marti; Andrés Ojeda; Jean-Rémi King; Yuanyuan Mi; Misha Tsodyks; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 3.  What limits working memory capacity?

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Dopamine D2 agonist affects visuospatial working memory distractor interference depending on individual differences in baseline working memory span.

Authors:  James M Broadway; Michael J Frank; James F Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Serial Dependence across Perception, Attention, and Memory.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Jason M Scimeca; Daniel P Bliss; David Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Individual representations in visual working memory inherit ensemble properties.

Authors:  Igor S Utochkin; Timothy F Brady
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Behavioral decoding of working memory items inside and outside the focus of attention.

Authors:  Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Supraliminal but not subliminal distracters bias working memory recall.

Authors:  Theresa Wildegger; Nicholas E Myers; Glyn Humphreys; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Spatial working memory alters the efficacy of input to visual cortex.

Authors:  Yaser Merrikhi; Kelsey Clark; Eddy Albarran; Mohammadbagher Parsa; Marc Zirnsak; Tirin Moore; Behrad Noudoost
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Current and future goals are represented in opposite patterns in object-selective cortex.

Authors:  Anouk Mariette van Loon; Katya Olmos-Solis; Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort; Christian Nl Olivers
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  8 in total

1.  Hemisphere-specific Parietal Contributions to the Interplay between Working Memory and Attention.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; John P Powers; Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.420

2.  The Spatiotemporal Neural Dynamics of Intersensory Attention Capture of Salient Stimuli: A Large-Scale Auditory-Visual Modeling Study.

Authors:  Qin Liu; Antonio Ulloa; Barry Horwitz
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.387

3.  Phonological Working Memory Representations in the Left Inferior Parietal Lobe in the Face of Distraction and Neural Stimulation.

Authors:  Qiuhai Yue; Randi C Martin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.473

4.  Effects of temporally regular versus irregular distractors on goal-directed cognition and behavior.

Authors:  Troby Ka-Yan Lui; Malte Wöstmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  An EEG-Based Investigation of the Effect of Perceived Observation on Visual Memory in Virtual Environments.

Authors:  Michael Darfler; Jesus G Cruz-Garza; Saleh Kalantari
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-15

6.  L-DOPA administration shifts the stability-flexibility balance towards attentional capture by distractors during a visual search task.

Authors:  T Goschke; M N Smolka; P Riedel; I M Domachowska; Y Lee; P T Neukam; L Tönges; S C Li
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Attention rhythmically samples multi-feature objects in working memory.

Authors:  Samson Chota; Carlo Leto; Laura van Zantwijk; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Perceptual coupling and decoupling are associated with individual differences in working memory encoding and maintenance.

Authors:  Meichao Zhang; Fiona McNab; Jonathan Smallwood; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 4.861

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.