Literature DB >> 32333372

Optimizing perception: Attended and ignored stimuli create opposing perceptual biases.

Mohsen Rafiei1, Sabrina Hansmann-Roth2, David Whitney3, Árni Kristjánsson2,4, Andrey Chetverikov5,6.   

Abstract

Humans have remarkable abilities to construct a stable visual world from continuously changing input. There is increasing evidence that momentary visual input blends with previous input to preserve perceptual continuity. Most studies have shown that such influences can be traced to characteristics of the attended object at a given moment. Little is known about the role of ignored stimuli in creating this continuity. This is important since while some input is selected for processing, other input must be actively ignored for efficient selection of the task-relevant stimuli. We asked whether attended targets and actively ignored distractor stimuli in an odd-one-out search task would bias observers' perception differently. Our observers searched for an oddly oriented line among distractors and were occasionally asked to report the orientation of the last visual search target they saw in an adjustment task. Our results show that at least two opposite biases from past stimuli influence current perception: A positive bias caused by serial dependence pulls perception of the target toward the previous target features, while a negative bias induced by the to-be-ignored distractor features pushes perception of the target away from the distractor distribution. Our results suggest that to-be-ignored items produce a perceptual bias that acts in parallel with other biases induced by attended items to optimize perception. Our results are the first to demonstrate how actively ignored information facilitates continuity in visual perception.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Feature distribution learning; Perception; Serial dependence; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32333372     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02030-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  44 in total

1.  Priming of pop-out on multiple time scales during visual search.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Elmar Pels; Arni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 3.  Getting rid of visual distractors: the why, when, how, and where.

Authors:  Leonardo Chelazzi; Francesco Marini; David Pascucci; Massimo Turatto
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-02-14

4.  Building ensemble representations: How the shape of preceding distractor distributions affects visual search.

Authors:  Andrey Chetverikov; Gianluca Campana; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-05-24

5.  Eye gaze direction shows a positive serial dependency.

Authors:  David Alais; Garry Kong; Colin Palmer; Colin Clifford
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features.

Authors:  Jason T Arita; Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Evidence for negative feature guidance in visual search is explained by spatial recoding.

Authors:  Valerie M Beck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Vision: efficient adaptive coding.

Authors:  David Burr; Guido Marco Cicchini
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Past visual experiences weigh in on body size estimation.

Authors:  Joanna Alexi; Dominique Cleary; Kendra Dommisse; Romina Palermo; Nadine Kloth; David Burr; Jason Bell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Serial dependence is absent at the time of perception but increases in visual working memory.

Authors:  Daniel P Bliss; Jerome J Sun; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  The test-retest reliability and spatial tuning of serial dependence in orientation perception.

Authors:  Aki Kondo; Yuki Murai; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Visual priming and serial dependence are mediated by separate mechanisms.

Authors:  Filippo Galluzzi; Alessandro Benedetto; Guido Marco Cicchini; David C Burr
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

3.  A shared mechanism for facial expression in human faces and face pareidolia.

Authors:  David Alais; Yiben Xu; Susan G Wardle; Jessica Taubert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.