Literature DB >> 29582377

Serial dependence in position occurs at the time of perception.

Mauro Manassi1, Alina Liberman2, Anna Kosovicheva3, Kathy Zhang2, David Whitney2,4,5.   

Abstract

Observers perceive objects in the world as stable over space and time, even though the visual experience of those objects is often discontinuous and distorted due to masking, occlusion, camouflage, or noise. How are we able to easily and quickly achieve stable perception in spite of this constantly changing visual input? It was previously shown that observers experience serial dependence in the perception of features and objects, an effect that extends up to 15 seconds back in time. Here, we asked whether the visual system utilizes an object's prior physical location to inform future position assignments in order to maximize location stability of an object over time. To test this, we presented subjects with small targets at random angular locations relative to central fixation in the peripheral visual field. Subjects reported the perceived location of the target on each trial by adjusting a cursor's position to match its location. Subjects made consistent errors when reporting the perceived position of the target on the current trial, mislocalizing it toward the position of the target in the preceding two trials (Experiment 1). This pull in position perception occurred even when a response was not required on the previous trial (Experiment 2). In addition, we show that serial dependence in perceived position occurs immediately after stimulus presentation, and it is a fast stabilization mechanism that does not require a delay (Experiment 3). This indicates that serial dependence occurs for position representations and facilitates the stable perception of objects in space. Taken together with previous work, our results show that serial dependence occurs at many stages of visual processing, from initial position assignment to object categorization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Perceptual stability; Sequential effects; Serial effects

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29582377     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1454-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  49 in total

1.  Backward masking.

Authors:  D H RAAB
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1963-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Sequential effects in face-attractiveness judgment.

Authors:  Aki Kondo; Kohske Takahashi; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion.

Authors:  R J Snowden
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-12-03       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  The influence of adaptation on perceived visual location.

Authors:  D Whitaker; P V Mcgraw; D M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Ghosts in the machine: memory interference from the previous trial.

Authors:  Charalampos Papadimitriou; Afreen Ferdoash; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Stable individual signatures in object localization.

Authors:  Anna Kosovicheva; David Whitney
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Facilitating stable representations: serial dependence in vision.

Authors:  Jennifer E Corbett; Jason Fischer; David Whitney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Serial dependence promotes object stability during occlusion.

Authors:  Alina Liberman; Kathy Zhang; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Different coding strategies for the perception of stable and changeable facial attributes.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  21 in total

1.  Predictive cues reduce but do not eliminate intrinsic response bias.

Authors:  Mingjia Hu; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-06-21

2.  A Bayesian and efficient observer model explains concurrent attractive and repulsive history biases in visual perception.

Authors:  Matthias Fritsche; Eelke Spaak; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Attractive serial dependence overcomes repulsive neuronal adaptation.

Authors:  Timothy C Sheehan; John T Serences
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 9.593

4.  The Motor Representation of Sensory Experience.

Authors:  Celine Cont; Eckart Zimmermann
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Serial dependence in time and numerosity perception is dimension-specific.

Authors:  Irene Togoli; Marta Fedele; Michele Fornaciai; Domenica Bueti
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Disrupting Short-Term Memory Maintenance in Premotor Cortex Affects Serial Dependence in Visuomotor Integration.

Authors:  Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto; Andreas Bartels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Serial dependence revealed in history-dependent perceptual templates.

Authors:  Yuki Murai; David Whitney
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 10.900

8.  Build-up of serial dependence in color working memory.

Authors:  Joao Barbosa; Albert Compte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Gravitational effects of scene information in object localization.

Authors:  Anna Kosovicheva; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The functional role of serial dependence.

Authors:  Guido Marco Cicchini; Kyriaki Mikellidou; David C Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.