Literature DB >> 31481435

Probabilistic Representation in Human Visual Cortex Reflects Uncertainty in Serial Decisions.

Ruben S van Bergen1, Janneke F M Jehee2.   

Abstract

How does the brain represent the reliability of its sensory evidence? Here, we test whether sensory uncertainty is encoded in cortical population activity as the width of a probability distribution, a hypothesis that lies at the heart of Bayesian models of neural coding. We probe the neural representation of uncertainty by capitalizing on a well-known behavioral bias called serial dependence. Human observers of either sex reported the orientation of stimuli presented in sequence, while activity in visual cortex was measured with fMRI. We decoded probability distributions from population-level activity and found that serial dependence effects in behavior are consistent with a statistically advantageous sensory integration strategy, in which uncertain sensory information is given less weight. More fundamentally, our results suggest that probability distributions decoded from human visual cortex reflect the sensory uncertainty that observers rely on in their decisions, providing critical evidence for Bayesian theories of perception.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Virtually any decision that people make is based on uncertain and incomplete information. Although uncertainty plays a major role in decision-making, we have but a nascent understanding of its neural basis. Here, we probe the neural code of uncertainty by capitalizing on a well-known perceptual illusion. We developed a computational model to explain the illusion, and tested it in behavioral and neuroimaging experiments. This revealed that the illusion is not a mistake of perception, but rather reflects a rational decision under uncertainty. No less important, we discovered that the uncertainty that people use in this decision is represented in brain activity as the width of a probability distribution, providing critical evidence for current Bayesian theories of decision-making.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational modeling; fMRI; perceptual decision-making; serial dependence; uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31481435      PMCID: PMC6786811          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3212-18.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  50 in total

1.  Predictive properties of visual adaptation.

Authors:  Adrien Chopin; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Serial Dependence in Perceptual Decisions Is Reflected in Activity Patterns in Primary Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Elexa St John-Saaltink; Peter Kok; Hakwan C Lau; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Compressive mapping of number to space reflects dynamic encoding mechanisms, not static logarithmic transform.

Authors:  Guido Marco Cicchini; Giovanni Anobile; David C Burr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Attractive Serial Dependence in the Absence of an Explicit Task.

Authors:  Michele Fornaciai; Joonkoo Park
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-01-30

5.  An oblique effect in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  C S Furmanski; S A Engel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Serial Dependence across Perception, Attention, and Memory.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Jason M Scimeca; Daniel P Bliss; David Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M I Sereno; A M Dale; J B Reppas; K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; T J Brady; B R Rosen; R B Tootell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Serial dependence in the perception of faces.

Authors:  Alina Liberman; Jason Fischer; David Whitney
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Visual recency bias is explained by a mixture model of internal representations.

Authors:  Kristjan Kalm; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Serial dependence is absent at the time of perception but increases in visual working memory.

Authors:  Daniel P Bliss; Jerome J Sun; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  12 in total

1.  A Bayesian and efficient observer model explains concurrent attractive and repulsive history biases in visual perception.

Authors:  Matthias Fritsche; Eelke Spaak; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Attractive serial dependence overcomes repulsive neuronal adaptation.

Authors:  Timothy C Sheehan; John T Serences
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 9.593

3.  Serial dependence and representational momentum in single-trial perceptual decisions.

Authors:  D Pascucci; G Plomp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Disrupting Short-Term Memory Maintenance in Premotor Cortex Affects Serial Dependence in Visuomotor Integration.

Authors:  Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto; Andreas Bartels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Joint representation of working memory and uncertainty in human cortex.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; Thomas C Sprague; Aspen H Yoo; Wei Ji Ma; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Brief Stimuli Cast a Persistent Long-Term Trace in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Matthias Fritsche; Samuel G Solomon; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.709

8.  The Importance of Considering Model Choices When Interpreting Results in Computational Neuroimaging.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Geoffrey M Boynton; John T Serences
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-12-20

9.  Subjective confidence reflects representation of Bayesian probability in cortex.

Authors:  Laura S Geurts; James R H Cooke; Ruben S van Bergen; Janneke F M Jehee
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-01-20

10.  Opposite effects of choice history and evidence history resolve a paradox of sequential choice bias.

Authors:  Ella Bosch; Matthias Fritsche; Benedikt V Ehinger; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.