Literature DB >> 25283781

Serial dependence in the perception of faces.

Alina Liberman1, Jason Fischer2, David Whitney3.   

Abstract

From moment to moment, we perceive objects in the world as continuous despite fluctuations in their image properties due to factors like occlusion, visual noise, and eye movements. The mechanism by which the visual system accomplishes this object continuity remains elusive. Recent results have demonstrated that the perception of low-level stimulus features such as orientation and numerosity is systematically biased (i.e., pulled) toward visual input from the recent past. The spatial region over which current orientations are pulled by previous orientations is known as the continuity field, which is temporally tuned for the past 10-15 s. This perceptual pull could contribute to the visual stability of low-level features over short time periods, but it does not address how visual stability occurs at the level of object identity. Here, we tested whether the visual system facilitates stable perception by biasing current perception of a face, a complex and behaviorally relevant object, toward recently seen faces. We found that perception of face identity is systematically biased toward identities seen up to several seconds prior, even across changes in viewpoint. This effect did not depend on subjects' prior responses or on the method used to measure identity perception. Although this bias in perceived identity manifests as a misperception, it is adaptive: visual processing echoes the stability of objects in the world to create perceptual continuity. The serial dependence of identity perception promotes object identity invariance over time and provides the clearest evidence for the existence of an object-selective perceptual continuity field.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25283781      PMCID: PMC4254333          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  30 in total

1.  Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Melanie Wilke; Alexander Maier; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes; Kai-Markus Müller; Linda Jeffery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The effects of perceptual history on memory of visual objects.

Authors:  Son Preminger; Dov Sagi; Misha Tsodyks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits.

Authors:  Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Sensory memory for ambiguous vision.

Authors:  Joel Pearson; Jan Brascamp
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Visual aftereffects.

Authors:  Peter Thompson; David Burr
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Object- and feature-based priming in visual search.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Arný Ingvarsdóttir; Unnur Diljá Teitsdóttir
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

8.  Changes in colour appearance following post-receptoral adaptation.

Authors:  M A Webster; J D Mollon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Hysteresis in the perception of motion direction as evidence for neural cooperativity.

Authors:  D Williams; G Phillips; R Sekuler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Nov 20-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The tilt after-effect: a fresh look.

Authors:  F W Campbell; L Maffei
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  76 in total

1.  Neural Integration of Stimulus History Underlies Prediction for Naturalistically Evolving Sequences.

Authors:  Brian Maniscalco; Jennifer L Lee; Patrice Abry; Amy Lin; Tom Holroyd; Biyu J He
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Saccadic remapping of object-selective information.

Authors:  Benjamin A Wolfe; David Whitney
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Different time scales of motion integration for anticipatory smooth pursuit and perceptual adaptation.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Elena Potapchuk; Scott N J Watamaniuk; Stephen J Heinen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Implied motion language can influence visual spatial memory.

Authors:  David W Vinson; Jan Engelen; Rolf A Zwaan; Teenie Matlock; Rick Dale
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

5.  Beyond Trial-Based Paradigms: Continuous Behavior, Ongoing Neural Activity, and Natural Stimuli.

Authors:  Alexander Huk; Kathryn Bonnen; Biyu J He
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Object-location binding across a saccade: A retinotopic spatial congruency bias.

Authors:  Anna Shafer-Skelton; Colin N Kupitz; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Probabilistic Representation in Human Visual Cortex Reflects Uncertainty in Serial Decisions.

Authors:  Ruben S van Bergen; Janneke F M Jehee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Serial dependence in position occurs at the time of perception.

Authors:  Mauro Manassi; Alina Liberman; Anna Kosovicheva; Kathy Zhang; David Whitney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

9.  Elucidating the Neural Representation and the Processing Dynamics of Face Ensembles.

Authors:  Tyler Roberts; Jonathan S Cant; Adrian Nestor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Confidence Leak in Perceptual Decision Making.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev; Ai Koizumi; Li Yan McCurdy; Mark D'Esposito; Hakwan Lau
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.