Literature DB >> 28461475

Limitations of ex vivo measurements for in vivo neuroscience.

Alexander Opitz1,2, Arnaud Falchier3, Gary S Linn3, Michael P Milham3,2, Charles E Schroeder3,4,5.   

Abstract

A long history of postmortem studies has provided significant insight into human brain structure and organization. Cadavers have also proven instrumental for the measurement of artifacts and nonneural effects in functional imaging, and more recently, the study of biophysical properties critical to brain stimulation. However, death produces significant changes in the biophysical properties of brain tissues, making an ex vivo to in vivo comparison complex, and even questionable. This study directly compares biophysical properties of electric fields arising from transcranial electric stimulation (TES) in a nonhuman primate brain pre- and postmortem. We show that pre- vs. postmortem, TES-induced intracranial electric fields differ significantly in both strength and frequency response dynamics, even while controlling for confounding factors such as body temperature. Our results clearly indicate that ex vivo cadaver and in vivo measurements are not easily equitable. In vivo examinations remain essential to establishing an adequate understanding of even basic biophysical phenomena in vivo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biophysical; electric field; nonhuman primate

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28461475      PMCID: PMC5441777          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1617024114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  18 in total

1.  The birth and evolution of neuroscience through cadaveric dissection.

Authors:  Karam Moon; Andreas K Filis; Alan R Cohen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation.

Authors:  S Ogawa; T M Lee; A R Kay; D W Tank
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Model of low-pass filtering of local field potentials in brain tissue.

Authors:  C Bédard; H Kröger; A Destexhe
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2006-05-19

Review 4.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey.

Authors:  C Gabriel; S Gabriel; E Corthout
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons.

Authors:  Costas A Anastassiou; Rodrigo Perin; Henry Markram; Christof Koch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Low-intensity electrical stimulation affects network dynamics by modulating population rate and spike timing.

Authors:  Davide Reato; Asif Rahman; Marom Bikson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  In-vivo measurements of human brain tissue conductivity using focal electrical current injection through intracerebral multicontact electrodes.

Authors:  Laurent Koessler; Sophie Colnat-Coulbois; Thierry Cecchin; Janis Hofmanis; Jacek P Dmochowski; Anthony M Norcia; Louis G Maillard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Imaging artifacts induced by electrical stimulation during conventional fMRI of the brain.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Marom Bikson; Abhishek Datta; Belen Lafon; Peter Dechent; Lucas C Parra; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Alexander Opitz; Arnaud Falchier; Chao-Gan Yan; Erin M Yeagle; Gary S Linn; Pierre Megevand; Axel Thielscher; Ross Deborah A; Michael P Milham; Ashesh D Mehta; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Anli A Liu; Belen Lafon; Daniel Friedman; Michael Dayan; Xiuyuan Wang; Marom Bikson; Werner K Doyle; Orrin Devinsky; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  A New Unifying Account of the Roles of Neuronal Entrainment.

Authors:  Peter Lakatos; Joachim Gross; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Comparative modeling of transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in mouse, monkey, and human.

Authors:  Ivan Alekseichuk; Kathleen Mantell; Sina Shirinpour; Alexander Opitz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Current challenges: the ups and downs of tACS.

Authors:  Nicholas S Bland; Martin V Sale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  What a Clinician Should Know About the Neurobiology of Schizophrenia: A Historical Perspective to Current Understanding.

Authors:  Lynn E DeLisi
Journal:  Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ)       Date:  2020-11-05

5.  On the importance of precise electrode placement for targeted transcranial electric stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander Opitz; Erin Yeagle; Axel Thielscher; Charles Schroeder; Ashesh D Mehta; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Perception of Rhythmic Speech Is Modulated by Focal Bilateral Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Benedikt Zoefel; Isobella Allard; Megha Anil; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Cerebellar tDCS as Therapy for Cerebellar Ataxias.

Authors:  Natale Maiorana; Matteo Guidetti; Michelangelo Dini; Alberto Priori; Roberta Ferrucci
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.648

Review 8.  Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Anli Liu; Mihály Vöröslakos; Greg Kronberg; Simon Henin; Matthew R Krause; Yu Huang; Alexander Opitz; Ashesh Mehta; Christopher C Pack; Bart Krekelberg; Antal Berényi; Lucas C Parra; Lucia Melloni; Orrin Devinsky; György Buzsáki
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Variation in Reported Human Head Tissue Electrical Conductivity Values.

Authors:  Hannah McCann; Giampaolo Pisano; Leandro Beltrachini
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Direct effects of transcranial electric stimulation on brain circuits in rats and humans.

Authors:  Mihály Vöröslakos; Yuichi Takeuchi; Kitti Brinyiczki; Tamás Zombori; Azahara Oliva; Antonio Fernández-Ruiz; Gábor Kozák; Zsigmond Tamás Kincses; Béla Iványi; György Buzsáki; Antal Berényi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.