Literature DB >> 35060077

Cerebellar tDCS as Therapy for Cerebellar Ataxias.

Natale Maiorana1, Matteo Guidetti1,2, Michelangelo Dini1, Alberto Priori1,3, Roberta Ferrucci4,5.   

Abstract

In recent years, a growing body of literature has investigated the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques to influence cerebellar activity and the effects of cerebellar stimulation on other brain regions through its multiple complex projections. From the early 1990s, with the discovery of the so-called cerebellar inhibition (CBI), several studies have focused their attention on the use of cerebellar NIBS as treatment for different motor disorders. Cerebellar ataxias (CAs) represent the prototypical clinical manifestation of cerebellar alterations, but other movement disorders, such as Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and dystonia have also been associated with alterations of networks which include the cerebellum, or of the cerebellum itself. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) could indeed represent an economical, non-invasive therapeutic tool with minimal side effects, thus improving the clinical management of patients and their quality of life. Studies show that ctDCS is effective as a therapeutic option for motor symptoms in patients with CAs, and especially in those with less severe forms, suggesting that ctDCS efficacy could result from augmented neuronal compensation, which itself relies on preserved cerebellar volume. Evidence for the efficacy of ctDCS is less conclusive for the other aforementioned motor disorders, although preliminary results are promising. Future studies should adopt more rigorous methods (e.g., larger sample sizes, double blinding, better characterization of the sample, reliable biomarkers), in order to allow the scientific community to derive higher-quality evidence on the efficacy of ctDCS as a therapeutic option for motor disorders.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hereditary cerebellar ataxias; Movement disorders; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35060077     DOI: 10.1007/s12311-021-01357-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.648


  27 in total

1.  Anodal Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum Reduces Cerebellar Brain Inhibition but Does Not Influence Afferent Input from the Hand or Face in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Sebastian H Doeltgen; Jessica Young; Lynley V Bradnam
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  The cerebellum communicates with the basal ganglia.

Authors:  Eiji Hoshi; Léon Tremblay; Jean Féger; Peter L Carras; Peter L Strick
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-02       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Percutaneous electrical stimulation of corticospinal pathways at the level of the pyramidal decussation in humans.

Authors:  Y Ugawa; J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; C D Marsden
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) decreases the amplitudes of long-latency stretch reflexes in cerebellar ataxia.

Authors:  Giuliana Grimaldi; Mario Manto
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the cortical motor areas in three cases of cerebellar ataxia.

Authors:  Nicolò Gabriele Pozzi; Brigida Minafra; Roberta Zangaglia; Roberto De Marzi; Giorgio Sandrini; Alberto Priori; Claudio Pacchetti
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of cerebellar ataxia: A two-phase, double-blind, auto-matched, pilot study.

Authors:  Thiago Lima Barretto; Igor Dórea Bandeira; João Gabriel Jagersbacher; Bianca Lima Barretto; Ângelo Frederico Souza de Oliveira E Torres; Norberto Peña; José Garcia Vivas Miranda; Rita Lucena
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Gowri Jayaram; Loni Ajagbe; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Genetic cerebellar ataxias.

Authors:  Elsdon Storey
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.420

9.  Magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum in humans.

Authors:  Y Ugawa; Y Uesaka; Y Terao; R Hanajima; I Kanazawa
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 10.  Consensus paper: the role of the cerebellum in perceptual processes.

Authors:  Oliver Baumann; Ronald J Borra; James M Bower; Kathleen E Cullen; Christophe Habas; Richard B Ivry; Maria Leggio; Jason B Mattingley; Marco Molinari; Eric A Moulton; Michael G Paulin; Marina A Pavlova; Jeremy D Schmahmann; Arseny A Sokolov
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.