Literature DB >> 21068312

Low-intensity electrical stimulation affects network dynamics by modulating population rate and spike timing.

Davide Reato1, Asif Rahman, Marom Bikson, Lucas C Parra.   

Abstract

Clinical effects of transcranial electrical stimulation with weak currents are remarkable considering the low amplitude of the electric fields acting on the brain. Elucidating the processes by which small currents affect ongoing brain activity is of paramount importance for the rational design of noninvasive electrotherapeutic strategies and to determine the relevance of endogenous fields. We propose that in active neuronal networks, weak electrical fields induce small but coherent changes in the firing rate and timing of neuronal populations that can be magnified by dynamic network activity. Specifically, we show that carbachol-induced gamma oscillations (25-35 Hz) in rat hippocampal slices have an inherent rate-limiting dynamic and timing precision that govern susceptibility to low-frequency weak electric fields (<50 Hz; <10 V/m). This leads to a range of nonlinear responses, including the following: (1) asymmetric power modulation by DC fields resulting from balanced excitation and inhibition; (2) symmetric power modulation by lower frequency AC fields with a net-zero change in firing rate; and (3) half-harmonic oscillations for higher frequency AC fields resulting from increased spike timing precision. These underlying mechanisms were elucidated by slice experiments and a parsimonious computational network model of single-compartment spiking neurons responding to electric field stimulation with small incremental polarization. Intracellular recordings confirmed model predictions on neuronal timing and rate changes, as well as spike phase-entrainment resonance at 0.2 V/m. Finally, our data and mechanistic framework provide a functional role for endogenous electric fields, specifically illustrating that modulation of gamma oscillations during theta-modulated gamma activity can result from field effects alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21068312      PMCID: PMC3500391          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2059-10.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  58 in total

1.  Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity.

Authors:  O D CREUTZFELDT; G H FROMM; H KAPP
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Spike timing of distinct types of GABAergic interneuron during hippocampal gamma oscillations in vitro.

Authors:  Norbert Hájos; János Pálhalmi; Edward O Mann; Beáta Németh; Ole Paulsen; Tamas F Freund
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks.

Authors:  Marlene Bartos; Imre Vida; Peter Jonas
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Synaptic currents in anatomically identified CA3 neurons during hippocampal gamma oscillations in vitro.

Authors:  Iris Oren; Edward O Mann; Ole Paulsen; Norbert Hájos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Predicting the distribution of synaptic strengths and cell firing correlations in a self-organizing, sequence prediction model.

Authors:  A Amarasingham; W B Levy
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Organization of intrahippocampal projections originating from CA3 pyramidal cells in the rat.

Authors:  N Ishizuka; J Weber; D G Amaral
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1990-05-22       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Influence of electric fields on the excitability of granule cells in guinea-pig hippocampal slices.

Authors:  J G Jefferys
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Hippocampal CA3 pyramidal cells selectively innervate aspiny interneurons.

Authors:  Lucia Wittner; Darrell A Henze; László Záborszky; György Buzsáki
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Effects of applied electric fields on low-calcium epileptiform activity in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices.

Authors:  R S Ghai; M Bikson; D M Durand
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  A double-blind, sham-controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of depression.

Authors:  Colleen K Loo; Perminder Sachdev; Donel Martin; Melissa Pigot; Angelo Alonzo; Gin S Malhi; Jim Lagopoulos; Philip Mitchell
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 5.176

View more
  165 in total

Review 1.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Left lateralizing transcranial direct current stimulation improves reading efficiency.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub; Jennifer Benson; Roy H Hamilton; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 3.  Brain Stimulation and the Role of the Right Hemisphere in Aphasia Recovery.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Effects of polarization induced by non-weak electric fields on the excitability of elongated neurons with active dendrites.

Authors:  Robert I Reznik; Ernest Barreto; Evelyn Sander; Paul So
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 5.  Neuromodulation of sleep rhythms in schizophrenia: Towards the rational design of non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Flavio Fröhlich; Caroline Lustenberger
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Exploring how extracellular electric field modulates neuron activity through dynamical analysis of a two-compartment neuron model.

Authors:  Guo-Sheng Yi; Jiang Wang; Xi-Le Wei; Kai-Ming Tsang; Wai-Lok Chan; Bin Deng; Chun-Xiao Han
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Frequency dependence of behavioral modulation by hippocampal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Giorgio La Corte; Yina Wei; Nick Chernyy; Bruce J Gluckman; Steven J Schiff
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of frontal cortex decreases performance on the WAIS-IV intelligence test.

Authors:  Kristin K Sellers; Juliann M Mellin; Caroline M Lustenberger; Michael R Boyle; Won Hee Lee; Angel V Peterchev; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Closed-Loop Slow-Wave tACS Improves Sleep-Dependent Long-Term Memory Generalization by Modulating Endogenous Oscillations.

Authors:  Nicholas Ketz; Aaron P Jones; Natalie B Bryant; Vincent P Clark; Praveen K Pilly
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Gregory Kronberg; Doris Ling; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.