Literature DB >> 30910725

Comparative modeling of transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in mouse, monkey, and human.

Ivan Alekseichuk1, Kathleen Mantell2, Sina Shirinpour2, Alexander Opitz3.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial electric stimulation (TES) are increasingly popular methods to noninvasively affect brain activity. However, their mechanism of action and dose-response characteristics remain under active investigation. Translational studies in animals play a pivotal role in these efforts due to a larger neuroscientific toolset enabled by invasive recordings. In order to translate knowledge gained in animal studies to humans, it is crucial to generate comparable stimulation conditions with respect to the induced electric field in the brain. Here, we conduct a finite element method (FEM) modeling study of TMS and TES electric fields in a mouse, capuchin and macaque monkeys, and a human model. We systematically evaluate the induced electric fields and analyze their relationship to head and brain anatomy. We find that with increasing head size, TMS-induced electric field strength first increases and then decreases according to a two-term exponential function. TES-induced electric field strength strongly decreases from smaller to larger specimen with up to 100x fold differences across species. Our results can serve as a basis to compare and match stimulation parameters across studies in animals and humans.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal model; Finite element modeling; Neuromodulation; Transcranial electric stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30910725      PMCID: PMC6536349          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  63 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of small animals: a modeling study of the influence of coil geometry, size and orientation.

Authors:  R Salvador; P C Miranda
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

2.  Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS.

Authors:  Ilkka Laakso; Satoshi Tanaka; Soichiro Koyama; Valerio De Santis; Akimasa Hirata
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  The electric field in the cortex during transcranial current stimulation.

Authors:  Pedro Cavaleiro Miranda; Abeye Mekonnen; Ricardo Salvador; Giulio Ruffini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Facilitates Associative Learning and Alters Functional Connectivity in the Primate Brain.

Authors:  Matthew R Krause; Theodoros P Zanos; Bennett A Csorba; Praveen K Pilly; Jaehoon Choe; Matthew E Phillips; Abhishek Datta; Christopher C Pack
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Inter-individual variability in optimal current direction for transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex.

Authors:  Daniela Balslev; Wouter Braet; Craig McAllister; R Chris Miall
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Normal neuroanatomical variation in the human brain: an MRI-volumetric study.

Authors:  John S Allen; Hanna Damasio; Thomas J Grabowski
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  Morphological maturation of the mouse brain: An in vivo MRI and histology investigation.

Authors:  Luam Hammelrath; Siniša Škokić; Artem Khmelinskii; Andreas Hess; Noortje van der Knaap; Marius Staring; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt; Dirk Wiedermann; Mathias Hoehn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Alexander Opitz; Arnaud Falchier; Chao-Gan Yan; Erin M Yeagle; Gary S Linn; Pierre Megevand; Axel Thielscher; Ross Deborah A; Michael P Milham; Ashesh D Mehta; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Multi-Scale Computational Models for Electrical Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Hyeon Seo; Sung C Jun
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow.

Authors:  Vishal Rawji; Matteo Ciocca; André Zacharia; David Soares; Dennis Truong; Marom Bikson; John Rothwell; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 8.955

View more
  19 in total

1.  How does transcranial alternating current stimulation entrain single-neuron activity in the primate brain?

Authors:  Ahmad Khatoun; Boateng Asamoah; Myles Mc Laughlin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Current challenges: the ups and downs of tACS.

Authors:  Nicholas S Bland; Martin V Sale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in aged rats depend on pre-treatment cognitive status: Toward individualized intervention for successful cognitive aging.

Authors:  Marina Weiler; Perla Moreno-Castilla; Hannah M Starnes; Edward L R Melendez; Kevin C Stieger; Jeffrey M Long; Peter R Rapp
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 9.184

4.  A high-density theta burst paradigm enhances the aftereffects of transcranial magnetic stimulation: Evidence from focal stimulation of rat motor cortex.

Authors:  Qinglei Meng; Hieu Nguyen; Antonia Vrana; Simone Baldwin; Charlotte Qiong Li; Antonia Giles; Jun Wang; Yihong Yang; Hanbing Lu
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 9.184

5.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation attenuates BOLD adaptation and increases functional connectivity.

Authors:  Kohitij Kar; Takuya Ito; Michael W Cole; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Multi-scale modeling toolbox for single neuron and subcellular activity under Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Sina Shirinpour; Nicholas Hananeia; James Rosado; Harry Tran; Christos Galanis; Andreas Vlachos; Peter Jedlicka; Gillian Queisser; Alexander Opitz
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Moving back in the brain to drive the field forward: Targeting neurostimulation to different brain regions in animal models of depression and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Michelle R Madore; Eugenia Poh; Samuel John Bollard; Jesus Rivera; Joy Taylor; Jauhtai Cheng; Eric Booth; Monica Nable; Alesha Heath; Jerry Yesavage; Jennifer Rodger; M Windy McNerney
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.987

8.  Rapid, Dose-Dependent Enhancement of Cerebral Blood Flow by transcranial AC Stimulation in Mouse.

Authors:  Dennis A Turner; Simone Degan; Francesca Galeffi; Stephen Schmidt; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Design and Evaluation of a Rodent-Specific Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil: An In Silico and In Vivo Validation Study.

Authors:  Julia Boonzaier; Petar I Petrov; Willem M Otte; Nickolay Smirnov; Sebastiaan F W Neggers; Rick M Dijkhuizen
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-07-29

10.  Therapeutic effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in a rat model of ADHD.

Authors:  Da Hee Jung; Sung Min Ahn; Malk Eun Pak; Hong Ju Lee; Young Jin Jung; Ki Bong Kim; Yong-Il Shin; Hwa Kyoung Shin; Byung Tae Choi
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.