Literature DB >> 31620829

Current challenges: the ups and downs of tACS.

Nicholas S Bland1,2, Martin V Sale3,4.   

Abstract

The non-invasive delivery of electric currents through the scalp (transcranial electrical stimulation) is a popular tool for neuromodulation, mostly due to its highly adaptable nature (waveform, montage) and tolerability at low intensities (< 2 mA). Applied rhythmically, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) may entrain neural oscillations in a frequency- and phase-specific manner, providing a causal perspective on brain-behaviour relationships. While the past decade has seen many behavioural and electrophysiological effects of tACS that suggest entrainment-mediated effects in the brain, it has been difficult to reconcile such reports with the weak intracranial field strengths (< 1 V/m) achievable at conventional intensities. In this review, we first describe the ongoing challenges faced by users of tACS. We outline the biophysics of electrical brain stimulation and the factors that contribute to the weak field intensities achievable in the brain. Since the applied current predominantly shunts through the scalp-stimulating the nerves that innervate it-the plausibility of transcutaneous (rather than transcranial) effects of tACS is also discussed. In examining the effects of tACS on brain activity, the complex problem of salvaging electrophysiological recordings from artefacts of tACS is described. Nevertheless, these challenges by no means mark the rise and fall of tACS: the second part of this review outlines the recent advancements in the field. We describe some ways in which artefacts of tACS may be better managed using high-frequency protocols, and describe innovative methods for current interactions within the brain that offer either dynamic or more focal current distributions while also minimising transcutaneous effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artefact; Electric field; Oscillation; Phase; Stimulation; Transcranial

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31620829     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05666-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  161 in total

1.  Entrainment of prefrontal beta oscillations induces an endogenous echo and impairs memory formation.

Authors:  Simon Hanslmayr; Jonas Matuschek; Marie-Christin Fellner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Frequency-dependent electrical stimulation of the visual cortex.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Leila Chaieb; Andrea Antal; Vincent Walsh; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Understanding the behavioural consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; Archy O de Berker; James Bonaiuto
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 4.  Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Jared Cooney Horvath; Jason D Forte; Olivia Carter
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 5.  Transcranial current brain stimulation (tCS): models and technologies.

Authors:  Giulio Ruffini; Fabrice Wendling; Isabelle Merlet; Behnam Molaee-Ardekani; Abeye Mekonnen; Ricardo Salvador; Aureli Soria-Frisch; Carles Grau; Stephen Dunne; Pedro C Miranda
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  The electric field in the cortex during transcranial current stimulation.

Authors:  Pedro Cavaleiro Miranda; Abeye Mekonnen; Ricardo Salvador; Giulio Ruffini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Evidence of transcranial direct current stimulation-generated electric fields at subthalamic level in human brain in vivo.

Authors:  Pratik Y Chhatbar; Steven A Kautz; Istvan Takacs; Nathan C Rowland; Gonzalo J Revuelta; Mark S George; Marom Bikson; Wuwei Feng
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Transcranial electric stimulation entrains cortical neuronal populations in rats.

Authors:  Simal Ozen; Anton Sirota; Mariano A Belluscio; Costas A Anastassiou; Eran Stark; Christof Koch; György Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow.

Authors:  Vishal Rawji; Matteo Ciocca; André Zacharia; David Soares; Dennis Truong; Marom Bikson; John Rothwell; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  tACS Phase Locking of Frontal Midline Theta Oscillations Disrupts Working Memory Performance.

Authors:  Bankim S Chander; Matthias Witkowski; Christoph Braun; Stephen E Robinson; Jan Born; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer; Surjo R Soekadar
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 5.505

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Central nervous system physiology.

Authors:  John Rothwell; Andrea Antal; David Burke; Antony Carlsen; Dejan Georgiev; Marjan Jahanshahi; Dagmar Sternad; Josep Valls-Solé; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  State-dependent effects of neural stimulation on brain function and cognition.

Authors:  Claire Bradley; Abbey S Nydam; Paul E Dux; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 38.755

3.  A Novel Program to Improve Cognitive Function in Individuals With Dementia Using Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) and Tutored Cognitive Exercises.

Authors:  Zahra Moussavi; Kazushige Kimura; Lonnie Kehler; Cristina de Oliveira Francisco; Brian Lithgow
Journal:  Front Aging       Date:  2021-03-12

4.  Motor training is improved by concurrent application of slow oscillating transcranial alternating current stimulation to motor cortex.

Authors:  Martin V Sale; Anastasiia Kuzovina
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.264

5.  Lorentz force induced shear waves for magnetic resonance elastography applications.

Authors:  Guillaume Flé; Guillaume Gilbert; Pol Grasland-Mongrain; Guy Cloutier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Double-blind randomized N-of-1 trial of transcranial alternating current stimulation for mal de débarquement syndrome.

Authors:  Yoon-Hee Cha; Diamond Gleghorn; Benjamin Chipper Doudican
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Working Memory and Transcranial-Alternating Current Stimulation-State of the Art: Findings, Missing, and Challenges.

Authors:  Wiam Al Qasem; Mohammed Abubaker; Eugen Kvašňák
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-14

8.  The Effect of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation With Cognitive Training on Executive Brain Function in Individuals With Dementia: Protocol for a Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Natasha Jacobson; Brian Lithgow; Mohammad Jafari Jozani; Zahra Moussavi
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-04-27

Review 9.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS): from basic mechanisms towards first applications in psychiatry.

Authors:  Osama Elyamany; Gregor Leicht; Christoph S Herrmann; Christoph Mulert
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 5.270

10.  Directionality of the injected current targeting the P20/N20 source determines the efficacy of 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)-induced aftereffects in the somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Mohd Faizal Mohd Zulkifly; Albert Lehr; Daniel van de Velden; Asad Khan; Niels K Focke; Carsten H Wolters; Walter Paulus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.