Literature DB >> 23099102

Imaging artifacts induced by electrical stimulation during conventional fMRI of the brain.

Andrea Antal1, Marom Bikson, Abhishek Datta, Belen Lafon, Peter Dechent, Lucas C Parra, Walter Paulus.   

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of brain activation during transcranial electrical stimulation is used to provide insight into the mechanisms of neuromodulation and targeting of particular brain structures. However, the passage of current through the body may interfere with the concurrent detection of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal, which is sensitive to local magnetic fields. To test whether these currents can affect concurrent fMRI recordings we performed conventional gradient echo-planar imaging (EPI) during transcranial direct current (tDCS) and alternating current stimulation (tACS) on two post-mortem subjects. tDCS induced signals in both superficial and deep structures. The signal was specific to the electrode montage, with the strongest signal near cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and scalp. The direction of change relative to non-stimulation reversed with tDCS stimulation polarity. For tACS there was no net effect of the MRI signal. High-resolution individualized modeling of current flow and induced static magnetic fields suggested a strong coincidence of the change EPI signal with regions of large current density and magnetic fields. These initial results indicate that (1) fMRI studies of tDCS must consider this potentially confounding interference from current flow and (2) conventional MRI imaging protocols can be potentially used to measure current flow during transcranial electrical stimulation. The optimization of current measurement and artifact correction techniques, including consideration of the underlying physics, remains to be addressed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain; Modeling; Post-mortem; fMRI; tACS; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23099102      PMCID: PMC3759658          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  32 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review.

Authors:  Liron Jacobson; Meni Koslowsky; Michal Lavidor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Rafael Polania; Carsten Schmidt-Samoa; Peter Dechent; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Conductivity imaging of canine brain using a 3 T MREIT system: postmortem experiments.

Authors:  Hyung Joong Kim; Byung Il Lee; Young Cho; Young Tae Kim; Byeong Teck Kang; Hee Myung Park; Soo Yeol Lee; Jin Keun Seo; Eung Je Woo
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 2.833

5.  Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance.

Authors:  G C Scott; M G Joy; R L Armstrong; R M Henkelman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Guidelines for precise and accurate computational models of tDCS.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Abhishek Datta
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 7.  Electrical stimulation and visual network plasticity.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

8.  Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Julie M Baker; Marom Bikson; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  High-resolution modeling assisted design of customized and individualized transcranial direct current stimulation protocols.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Asif Rahman; Abhishek Datta; Felipe Fregni; Lotfi Merabet
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2012-07-10

10.  Speech facilitation by left inferior frontal cortex stimulation.

Authors:  Rachel Holland; Alex P Leff; Oliver Josephs; Joseph M Galea; Mahalekshmi Desikan; Cathy J Price; John C Rothwell; Jennifer Crinion
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  52 in total

1.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy maps cortical plasticity underlying altered motor performance induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Bilal Khan; Timea Hodics; Nathan Hervey; George Kondraske; Ann M Stowe; George Alexandrakis
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Optogenetic Functional MRI.

Authors:  Peter Lin; Zhongnan Fang; Jia Liu; Jin Hyung Lee
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 3.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Selective modulation of interhemispheric connectivity by transcranial alternating current stimulation influences binaural integration.

Authors:  Basil C Preisig; Lars Riecke; Matthias J Sjerps; Anne Kösem; Benjamin R Kop; Bob Bramson; Peter Hagoort; Alexis Hervais-Adelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Limitations of ex vivo measurements for in vivo neuroscience.

Authors:  Alexander Opitz; Arnaud Falchier; Gary S Linn; Michael P Milham; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Benchmarking transcranial electrical stimulation finite element models: a comparison study.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Munish Chauhan; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 7.  Neuromodulation for brain disorders: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Hubert H Lim; Theoden I Netoff; Allison T Connolly; Nessa Johnson; Abhrajeet Roy; Abbey Holt; Kelvin O Lim; James R Carey; Jerrold L Vitek; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Clinician accessible tools for GUI computational models of transcranial electrical stimulation: BONSAI and SPHERES.

Authors:  Dennis Q Truong; Mathias Hüber; Xihe Xie; Abhishek Datta; Asif Rahman; Lucas C Parra; Jacek P Dmochowski; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Automated MRI segmentation for individualized modeling of current flow in the human head.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Jacek P Dmochowski; Yuzhuo Su; Abhishek Datta; Christopher Rorden; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 10.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.