Literature DB >> 31659922

Perception of Rhythmic Speech Is Modulated by Focal Bilateral Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.

Benedikt Zoefel1, Isobella Allard1, Megha Anil1, Matthew H Davis1.   

Abstract

Several recent studies have used transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to demonstrate a causal role of neural oscillatory activity in speech processing. In particular, it has been shown that the ability to understand speech in a multi-speaker scenario or background noise depends on the timing of speech presentation relative to simultaneously applied tACS. However, it is possible that tACS did not change actual speech perception but rather auditory stream segregation. In this study, we tested whether the phase relation between tACS and the rhythm of degraded words, presented in silence, modulates word report accuracy. We found strong evidence for a tACS-induced modulation of speech perception, but only if the stimulation was applied bilaterally using ring electrodes (not for unilateral left hemisphere stimulation with square electrodes). These results were only obtained when data were analyzed using a statistical approach that was identified as optimal in a previous simulation study. The effect was driven by a phasic disruption of word report scores. Our results suggest a causal role of neural entrainment for speech perception and emphasize the importance of optimizing stimulation protocols and statistical approaches for brain stimulation research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31659922      PMCID: PMC7212037          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  63 in total

1.  On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS.

Authors:  Guilherme B Saturnino; André Antunes; Axel Thielscher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The preregistration revolution needs to distinguish between predictions and analyses.

Authors:  Alison Ledgerwood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses.

Authors:  David W Purcell; Sasha M John; Bruce A Schneider; Terence W Picton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech Comprehension: Stimulating Discussions at a Cocktail Party.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Neural Entrainment to Speech Modulates Speech Intelligibility.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Elia Formisano; Bettina Sorger; Deniz Başkent; Etienne Gaudrain
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Neural Oscillations Carry Speech Rhythm through to Comprehension.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-06

8.  The preregistration revolution.

Authors:  Brian A Nosek; Charles R Ebersole; Alexander C DeHaven; David T Mellor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain.

Authors:  Joachim Gross; Nienke Hoogenboom; Gregor Thut; Philippe Schyns; Stefano Panzeri; Pascal Belin; Simon Garrod
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  10 Hz tACS Over Somatosensory Cortex Does Not Modulate Supra-Threshold Tactile Temporal Discrimination in Humans.

Authors:  Marc A Wittenberg; Mitjan Morr; Alfons Schnitzler; Joachim Lange
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sustained neural rhythms reveal endogenous oscillations supporting speech perception.

Authors:  Sander van Bree; Ediz Sohoglu; Matthew H Davis; Benedikt Zoefel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 8.029

2.  Differential Auditory and Visual Phase-Locking Are Observed during Audio-Visual Benefit and Silent Lip-Reading for Speech Perception.

Authors:  Máté Aller; Heidi Solberg Økland; Lucy J MacGregor; Helen Blank; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.709

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.