Literature DB >> 27726249

In-vivo measurements of human brain tissue conductivity using focal electrical current injection through intracerebral multicontact electrodes.

Laurent Koessler1,2,3, Sophie Colnat-Coulbois4, Thierry Cecchin1,2, Janis Hofmanis5, Jacek P Dmochowski6, Anthony M Norcia7, Louis G Maillard1,2,3.   

Abstract

In-vivo measurements of human brain tissue conductivity at body temperature were conducted using focal electrical currents injected through intracerebral multicontact electrodes. A total of 1,421 measurements in 15 epileptic patients (age: 28 ± 10) using a radiofrequency generator (50 kHz current injection) were analyzed. Each contact pair was classified as being from healthy (gray matter, n = 696; white matter, n = 530) or pathological (epileptogenic zone, n = 195) tissue using neuroimaging analysis of the local tissue environment and intracerebral EEG recordings. Brain tissue conductivities were obtained using numerical simulations based on conductivity estimates that accounted for the current flow in the local brain volume around the contact pairs (a cube with a side length of 13 mm). Conductivity values were 0.26 S/m for gray matter and 0.17 S/m for white matter. Healthy gray and white matter had statistically different median impedances (P < 0.0001). White matter conductivity was found to be homogeneous as normality tests did not find evidence of multiple subgroups. Gray matter had lower conductivity in healthy tissue than in the epileptogenic zone (0.26 vs. 0.29 S/m; P = 0.012), even when the epileptogenic zone was not visible in the magnetic resonance image (MRI) (P = 0.005). The present in-vivo conductivity values could serve to create more accurate volume conduction models and could help to refine the identification of relevant intracerebral contacts, especially when located within the epileptogenic zone of an MRI-invisible lesion. Hum Brain Mapp 38:974-986, 2017.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain tissue; depth electrode; electric conductivity; epilepsy; human investigation; in-vivo measurement; stereoelectroencephalography; volume conduction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27726249      PMCID: PMC6867008          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  53 in total

1.  Two-dimensional finite element modelling of the neonatal head.

Authors:  A Gibson; R H Bayford; D S Holder
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.833

2.  Multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (EIT) of the adult human head: initial findings in brain tumours, arteriovenous malformations and chronic stroke, development of an analysis method and calibration.

Authors:  A Romsauerova; A McEwan; L Horesh; R Yerworth; R H Bayford; D S Holder
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  SEEG-guided RF-thermocoagulation of epileptic foci: a therapeutic alternative for drug-resistant non-operable partial epilepsies.

Authors:  M Guénot; J Isnard; H Catenoix; F Mauguière; M Sindou
Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg       Date:  2011

4.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz.

Authors:  S Gabriel; R W Lau; C Gabriel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Variable anisotropic brain electrical conductivities in epileptogenic foci.

Authors:  M Akhtari; M Mandelkern; D Bui; N Salamon; H V Vinters; G W Mathern
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.

Authors:  Johannes Vorwerk; Jae-Hyun Cho; Stefan Rampp; Hajo Hamer; Thomas R Knösche; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  [New approach to the neurosurgery of epilepsy. Stereotaxic methodology and therapeutic results. 1. Introduction and history].

Authors:  J Talairach; J Bancaud; G Szikla; A Bonis; S Geier; C Vedrenne
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 1.553

8.  Anatomic correlates of deep brain stimulation electrode impedance.

Authors:  David Satzer; Eric W Maurer; David Lanctin; Weihua Guan; Aviva Abosch
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  3D modeling of the total electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation using the boundary element method.

Authors:  F S Salinas; J L Lancaster; P T Fox
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Measurement of the conductivity of skull, temporarily removed during epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  R Hoekema; G H Wieneke; F S S Leijten; C W M van Veelen; P C van Rijen; G J M Huiskamp; J Ansems; A C van Huffelen
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.020

View more
  19 in total

1.  Limitations of ex vivo measurements for in vivo neuroscience.

Authors:  Alexander Opitz; Arnaud Falchier; Gary S Linn; Michael P Milham; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  A review of anisotropic conductivity models of brain white matter based on diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Zhanxiong Wu; Yang Liu; Ming Hong; Xiaohui Yu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Neurophysiological considerations for visual implants.

Authors:  Sabrina J Meikle; Yan T Wong
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  Novel Electrode Placement in Electrical Bioimpedance-Based Stroke Detection: Effects on Current Penetration and Injury Characterization in a Finite Element Model.

Authors:  Theodore S Bronk; Alicia C Everitt; Ethan K Murphy; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.756

5.  ECoG high-gamma modulation versus electrical stimulation for presurgical language mapping.

Authors:  Ravindra Arya; Paul S Horn; Nathan E Crone
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.937

6.  Quantitative sodium imaging and gliomas: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Lucidio P Nunes Neto; Guillaume Madelin; Terlika Pandit Sood; Chih-Chun Wu; Douglas Kondziolka; Dimitris Placantonakis; John G Golfinos; Andrew Chi; Rajan Jain
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Anli A Liu; Belen Lafon; Daniel Friedman; Michael Dayan; Xiuyuan Wang; Marom Bikson; Werner K Doyle; Orrin Devinsky; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Transcranial electric stimulation seen from within the brain.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Distribution of brain sodium long and short relaxation times and concentrations: a multi-echo ultra-high field 23Na MRI study.

Authors:  Ben Ridley; Armin M Nagel; Mark Bydder; Adil Maarouf; Jan-Patrick Stellmann; Soraya Gherib; Jeremy Verneuil; Patrick Viout; Maxime Guye; Jean-Philippe Ranjeva; Wafaa Zaaraoui
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Realistic volumetric-approach to simulate transcranial electric stimulation-ROAST-a fully automated open-source pipeline.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.