| Literature DB >> 28452042 |
Matteo Cadossi1, Silvio Terrando2, Andrea Sambri1, Giuseppe Tedesco1, Antonio Mazzotti1, Barbara Bordini3, Dalila De Pasquale3, Cesare Faldini1.
Abstract
"My Hip Resurfacing (HR) has been recalled. What will happen to me?" This is the question of every patient who underwent an implant recall, a highly stressful event for both patients and physicians. Triggered by a 11.64% failure rate at 7 years, a recall process started for Adept HR with head diameter less than 48 mm. We report our experience in the recall process of 40 patients with the above-mentioned components. One patient underwent revision surgery due to an adverse reaction to metal debris at 5-year follow-up. None of the patients were scheduled for revision, with an estimated survival rate of 97.6% at 7 years. Implants were well positioned with an average acetabular inclination angle of 37°. Cobalt and chromium blood levels were below the safety threshold of clinical relevance. Functional scores were excellent. In the case of a well-positioned device with normal ion levels, a good performance of the implant is generally observed. Even if we experienced a very low revision rate, this may certainly get worse over time since not all possible failures are predictable, thus requiring a careful periodic follow-up.Entities:
Keywords: Arthroplasty; Emotional distress; Hip Resurfacing; Metal ions; Revision rate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28452042 DOI: 10.1007/s12306-017-0476-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Musculoskelet Surg ISSN: 2035-5114