Literature DB >> 25274912

Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series.

J Daniel1, C Pradhan2, H Ziaee1, P B Pynsent2, D J W McMinn1.   

Abstract

We report a 12- to 15-year implant survival assessment of a prospective single-surgeon series of Birmingham Hip Resurfacings (BHRs). The earliest 1000 consecutive BHRs including 288 women (335 hips) and 598 men (665 hips) of all ages and diagnoses with no exclusions were prospectively followed-up with postal questionnaires, of whom the first 402 BHRs (350 patients) also had clinical and radiological review. Mean follow-up was 13.7 years (12.3 to 15.3). In total, 59 patients (68 hips) died 0.7 to 12.6 years following surgery from unrelated causes. There were 38 revisions, 0.1 to 13.9 years (median 8.7) following operation, including 17 femoral failures (1.7%) and seven each of infections, soft-tissue reactions and other causes. With revision for any reason as the end-point Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed 97.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 96.9 to 97.9) and 95.8% (95% CI 95.1 to 96.5) survival at ten and 15 years, respectively. Radiological assessment showed 11 (3.5%) femoral and 13 (4.1%) acetabular radiolucencies which were not deemed failures and one radiological femoral failure (0.3%). Our study shows that the performance of the BHR continues to be good at 12- to 15-year follow-up. Men have better implant survival (98.0%; 95% CI 97.4 to 98.6) at 15 years than women (91.5%; 95% CI 89.8 to 93.2), and women < 60 years (90.5%; 95% CI 88.3 to 92.7) fare worse than others. Hip dysplasia and osteonecrosis are risk factors for failure. Patients under 50 years with osteoarthritis fare best (99.4%; 95% CI 98.8 to 100 survival at 15 years), with no failures in men in this group. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse reactions; Hip dysplasia; Hip resurfacing; Metal debris; Osteoarthrosis; Osteonecrosis; Radiology; Survivorship

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25274912     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B10.33695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  20 in total

1.  Are There Long-term Benefits to Cementing the Metaphyseal Stem in Hip Resurfacing?

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff; Sandeep K Bhaurla
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  The future role of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray; Ronan B C Treacy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Design Considerations for the Next Generation Hip Resurfacing Implant: Commentary.

Authors:  Edwin P Su
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-12-19

4.  What should I expect from my recalled Adept Hip Resurfacing?

Authors:  Matteo Cadossi; Silvio Terrando; Andrea Sambri; Giuseppe Tedesco; Antonio Mazzotti; Barbara Bordini; Dalila De Pasquale; Cesare Faldini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-27

5.  Long-term results of Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Masaki Takao; Hidetoshi Hamada; Takashi Sakai; Kenji Ohzono; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 1.731

6.  A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up.

Authors:  Ran Tao; Fan Liu; Ya-Ke Liu; Yue Lu; Hua Xu; Yi Cao; Zhen-Yu Zhou; Wei Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Current indications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty in 2016.

Authors:  Robert Sershon; Rishi Balkissoon; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

8.  What Are the Benefits of Hip Resurfacing in Appropriate Patients? A Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Alexander S McLawhorn; Leonard T Buller; Jason L Blevins; Yuo Yu Lee; Edwin P Su
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-12-04

9.  Is the Revision Rate Higher After Hip Arthroplasty in Teenage Patients? A Prospective Study with Long-Term Follow-Up of More Than 10 Years.

Authors:  Vijay C Bose; Kanniyan Kalaivanan; Mithun Manohar; Ashok Kumar; Shantanu Patil; P Suryanarayan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty provides excellent long-term survivorship and function in patients with a good-sized femoral head : results of a single, non-designer surgeon's cohort.

Authors:  M Haseeb Gani; Ubaid Zahoor; Sammy A Hanna; Gareth Scott
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.