Literature DB >> 17785738

Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study.

C B Hing1, D A Young, R E Dalziel, M Bailey, D L Back, A J Shimmin.   

Abstract

Narrowing of the femoral neck after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip has been described previously in both cemented and uncemented hip resurfacing. The natural history of narrowing of the femoral neck is unknown. We retrospectively measured the diameter of the femoral neck in a series of 163 Birmingham hip resurfacings in 163 patients up to a maximum of six years after operation to determine the extent and progression of narrowing. There were 105 men and 58 women with a mean age of 52 years (18 to 82). At a mean follow-up of five years, the mean Harris hip score was 94.8 (47 to 100) and the mean flexion of the hip 112.5 degrees (80 degrees to 160 degrees ). There was some narrowing of the femoral neck in 77% (125) of the patients reviewed, and in 27.6% (45) the narrowing exceeded 10% of the diameter of the neck. A multiple logistic regression analysis showed a significant association (chi-squared test (derived from logistic regression) p = 0.01) of narrowing with female gender and a valgus femoral neck/shaft angle. There was no significant association between the range of movement, position or size of the component or radiological lucent lines and narrowing of the neck (chi-squared test; p = 0.10 (flexion), p = 0.08 (size of femoral component), p = 0.09 (size of acetabular component), p = 0.71 (femoral component angulation), p = 0.99 (lucent lines)). There was no significant difference between the diameter of the neck at a mean of three years (2.5 to 3.5) and that at five years (4.5 to 5.5), indicating that any change in the diameter of the neck had stabilised by three years (sign rank test, p = 0.60). We conclude that narrowing of the femoral neck which is found with the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty is in most cases associated with no adverse clinical or radiological outcome up to a maximum of six years after the initial operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17785738     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.18830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  32 in total

1.  High revision rate at 5 years after hip resurfacing with the Durom implant.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Ronny Pilz; Urs Munzinger; Otmar Hersche; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Bone mineral density in the femoral neck increases after hip resurfacing: a cohort with five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Charles A Willis-Owen; Henry D Atkinson; Roger D Oakeshott
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: 5-year clinical and radiographic results from a District General Hospital.

Authors:  B Ollivere; S Duckett; A August; M Porteous
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  2008 Otto Aufranc Award: component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Wadih Y Matar; Philippe Poitras; Kevin Smit; Olivier May
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Cementing the metaphyseal stem in metal-on-metal resurfacing: when and why.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Radiology of the resurfaced hip.

Authors:  Luthfur Rahman; Margaret Hall-Craggs; Sarah K Muirhead-Allwood
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Neck narrowing in resurfacing hip arthroplasty: a vascular insult?

Authors:  S A Brennan; F Khan; J McQuillan; C J O'Neill; P Kenny; S K O'Rourke; J M O'Byrne
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Bone density of the femoral neck following Birmingham hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Nick J Cooke; Lauren Rodgers; David Rawlings; Andrew W McCaskie; James P Holland
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wael A Rahman; Nelson V Greidanus; Alexander Siegmeth; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigation.

Authors:  Andrea Emilio Salvi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.