Literature DB >> 26733633

Hip resurfacing: a large, US single-surgeon series.

P J Brooks1.   

Abstract

Hip resurfacing has been proposed as an alternative to traditional total hip arthroplasty in young, active patients. Much has been learned following the introduction of metal-on-metal resurfacing devices in the 1990s. The triad of a well-designed device, implanted accurately, in the correct patient has never been more critical than with these implants. Following Food and Drug Administration approval in 2006, we studied the safety and effectiveness of one hip resurfacing device (Birmingham Hip Resurfacing) at our hospital in a large, single-surgeon series. We report our early to mid-term results in 1333 cases followed for a mean of 4.3 years (2 to 5.7) using a prospective, observational registry. The mean patient age was 53.1 years (12 to 84); 70% were male and 91% had osteoarthritis. Complications were few, including no dislocations, no femoral component loosening, two femoral neck fractures (0.15%), one socket loosening (0.08%), three deep infections (0.23%), and three cases of metallosis (0.23%). There were no destructive pseudotumours. Overall survivorship at up to 5.7 years was 99.2%. Aseptic survivorship in males under the age of 50 was 100%. We believe this is the largest United States series of a single surgeon using a single resurfacing system. ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birmingham; Hip resurfacing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26733633     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  6 in total

1.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  What should I expect from my recalled Adept Hip Resurfacing?

Authors:  Matteo Cadossi; Silvio Terrando; Andrea Sambri; Giuseppe Tedesco; Antonio Mazzotti; Barbara Bordini; Dalila De Pasquale; Cesare Faldini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-27

Review 3.  A meta-analysis assessing time for return to sport following hip resurfacing.

Authors:  A Magan; W Wignadasan; B Kayani; G Radhakrishnan; F Ronca; F S Haddad
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.928

4.  Long-term results of Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Masaki Takao; Hidetoshi Hamada; Takashi Sakai; Kenji Ohzono; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 1.731

5.  A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up.

Authors:  Ran Tao; Fan Liu; Ya-Ke Liu; Yue Lu; Hua Xu; Yi Cao; Zhen-Yu Zhou; Wei Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Use of a long distally fixed intramedullary stem to treat a periprosthetic femoral fracture following total hip arthroplasty using a thrust plate hip prosthesis: A case report.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Hatanaka; Goro Motomura; Satoshi Ikemura; Kazuhiko Sonoda; Yusuke Kubo; Takeshi Utsunomiya; Takuaki Yamamoto; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-06-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.