Literature DB >> 28399632

Predicting Binding Free Energies: Frontiers and Benchmarks.

David L Mobley1, Michael K Gilson2.   

Abstract

Binding free energy calculations based on molecular simulations provide predicted affinities for biomolecular complexes. These calculations begin with a detailed description of a system, including its chemical composition and the interactions among its components. Simulations of the system are then used to compute thermodynamic information, such as binding affinities. Because of their promise for guiding molecular design, these calculations have recently begun to see widespread applications in early-stage drug discovery. However, many hurdles remain in making them a robust and reliable tool. In this review, we highlight key challenges of these calculations, discuss some examples of these challenges, and call for the designation of standard community benchmark test systems that will help the research community generate and evaluate progress. In our view, progress will require careful assessment and evaluation of new methods, force fields, and modeling innovations on well-characterized benchmark systems, and we lay out our vision for how this can be achieved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alchemical; benchmark; binding affinity; binding free energy; biomolecular interactions; molecular simulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28399632      PMCID: PMC5544526          DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys        ISSN: 1936-122X            Impact factor:   12.981


  113 in total

Review 1.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Martin Karplus; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2002-09

2.  Rescoring docking hit lists for model cavity sites: predictions and experimental testing.

Authors:  Alan P Graves; Devleena M Shivakumar; Sarah E Boyce; Matthew P Jacobson; David A Case; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Reply to Kitahara and Mulder: An ensemble view of protein stability best explains pressure effects in a T4 lysozyme cavity mutant.

Authors:  A Joshua Wand; Nathaniel V Nucci
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Grid inhomogeneous solvation theory: hydration structure and thermodynamics of the miniature receptor cucurbit[7]uril.

Authors:  Crystal N Nguyen; Tom Kurtzman Young; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Role of cavities and hydration in the pressure unfolding of T4 lysozyme.

Authors:  Nathaniel V Nucci; Brian Fuglestad; Evangelia A Athanasoula; A Joshua Wand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Specificity of ligand binding in a buried nonpolar cavity of T4 lysozyme: linkage of dynamics and structural plasticity.

Authors:  A Morton; B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-07-11       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Energetic origins of specificity of ligand binding in an interior nonpolar cavity of T4 lysozyme.

Authors:  A Morton; W A Baase; B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-07-11       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.

Authors:  Symon Gathiaka; Shuai Liu; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Jeanne A Stuckey; You Na Kang; Jim Delproposto; Ginger Kubish; James B Dunbar; Heather A Carlson; Stephen K Burley; W Patrick Walters; Rommie E Amaro; Victoria A Feher; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 9.  Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better?

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael W Chiu; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Blind prediction of charged ligand binding affinities in a model binding site.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; Sarah E Boyce; Marcus Fischer; Inbar Fish; David L Mobley; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  82 in total

1.  Toward Learned Chemical Perception of Force Field Typing Rules.

Authors:  Camila Zanette; Caitlin C Bannan; Christopher I Bayly; Josh Fass; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Resolving the Ligand-Binding Specificity in c-MYC G-Quadruplex DNA: Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations and SPR Experiment.

Authors:  Nanjie Deng; Lauren Wickstrom; Piotr Cieplak; Clement Lin; Danzhou Yang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.

Authors:  Xibing He; Viet H Man; Beihong Ji; Xiang-Qun Xie; Junmei Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Absolute Free Energy of Binding Calculations for Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor in Complex with a Druglike Inhibitor.

Authors:  Yue Qian; Israel Cabeza de Vaca; Jonah Z Vilseck; Daniel J Cole; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Computation of protein-ligand binding free energies using quantum mechanical bespoke force fields.

Authors:  Daniel J Cole; Israel Cabeza de Vaca; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.597

Review 7.  Molecular Dynamics for Antimicrobial Peptide Discovery.

Authors:  Nicholas Palmer; Jacqueline R M A Maasch; Marcelo D T Torres; César de la Fuente-Nunez
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Simulating Water Exchange to Buried Binding Sites.

Authors:  Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Charles Lin; Tom Kurtzman; Ross C Walker; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Lin Frank Song; Nupur Bansal; Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Accounting for the Central Role of Interfacial Water in Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Zhixiong Lin; Brian K Radak; Charles Lin; Woody Sherman; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.