Literature DB >> 31553604

Absolute Free Energy of Binding Calculations for Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor in Complex with a Druglike Inhibitor.

Yue Qian1, Israel Cabeza de Vaca1, Jonah Z Vilseck1, Daniel J Cole1, Julian Tirado-Rives1, William L Jorgensen1.   

Abstract

Calculation of the absolute free energy of binding (ΔGbind) for a complex in solution is challenging owing to the need for adequate configurational sampling and an accurate energetic description, typically with a force field (FF). In this study, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations with improved side-chain and backbone sampling are used to assess ΔGbind for the complex of a druglike inhibitor (MIF180) with the protein macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) using free energy perturbation (FEP) calculations. For comparison, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were employed as an alternative sampling method for the same system. With the OPLS-AA/M FF and CM5 atomic charges for the inhibitor, the ΔGbind results from the MC/FEP and MD/FEP simulations, -8.80 ± 0.74 and -8.46 ± 0.85 kcal/mol, agree well with each other and with the experimental value of -8.98 ± 0.28 kcal/mol. The convergence of the results and analysis of the trajectories indicate that sufficient sampling was achieved for both approaches. Repeating the MD/FEP calculations using current versions of the CHARMM and AMBER FFs led to a 6 kcal/mol range of computed ΔGbind. These results show that calculation of accurate ΔGbind for large ligands is both feasible and numerically equivalent, within error limits, using either methodology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31553604      PMCID: PMC7932129          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b07588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  43 in total

1.  Calculation of Standard Binding Free Energies:  Aromatic Molecules in the T4 Lysozyme L99A Mutant.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD.

Authors:  James C Phillips; Rosemary Braun; Wei Wang; James Gumbart; Emad Tajkhorshid; Elizabeth Villa; Christophe Chipot; Robert D Skeel; Laxmikant Kalé; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Enhanced Monte Carlo Methods for Modeling Proteins Including Computation of Absolute Free Energies of Binding.

Authors:  Israel Cabeza de Vaca; Yue Qian; Jonah Z Vilseck; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Perspective on Free-Energy Perturbation Calculations for Chemical Equilibria.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen; Laura L Thomas
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  D3R Grand Challenge 2: blind prediction of protein-ligand poses, affinity rankings, and relative binding free energies.

Authors:  Zied Gaieb; Shuai Liu; Symon Gathiaka; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Chenghua Shao; Victoria A Feher; W Patrick Walters; Bernd Kuhn; Markus G Rudolph; Stephen K Burley; Michael K Gilson; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Design, synthesis, and protein crystallography of biaryltriazoles as potent tautomerase inhibitors of macrophage migration inhibitory factor.

Authors:  Pawel Dziedzic; José A Cisneros; Michael J Robertson; Alissa A Hare; Nadia E Danford; Richard H G Baxter; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 7.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Evaluation of CM5 Charges for Nonaqueous Condensed-Phase Modeling.

Authors:  Leela S Dodda; Jonah Z Vilseck; Kara J Cutrona; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Hatcher; C Acharya; S Kundu; S Zhong; J Shim; E Darian; O Guvench; P Lopes; I Vorobyov; A D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  H++: a server for estimating pKas and adding missing hydrogens to macromolecules.

Authors:  John C Gordon; Jonathan B Myers; Timothy Folta; Valia Shoja; Lenwood S Heath; Alexey Onufriev
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  Metadynamics as a Postprocessing Method for Virtual Screening with Application to the Pseudokinase Domain of JAK2.

Authors:  Kara J Cutrona; Ana S Newton; Stefan G Krimmer; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  Estimating the Roles of Protonation and Electronic Polarization in Absolute Binding Affinity Simulations.

Authors:  Edward King; Ruxi Qi; Han Li; Ray Luo; Erick Aitchison
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 3.  Accurate determination of protein:ligand standard binding free energies from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Haohao Fu; Haochuan Chen; Marharyta Blazhynska; Emma Goulard Coderc de Lacam; Florence Szczepaniak; Anna Pavlova; Xueguang Shao; James C Gumbart; François Dehez; Benoît Roux; Wensheng Cai; Christophe Chipot
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 17.021

4.  Combining Machine Learning and Enhanced Sampling Techniques for Efficient and Accurate Calculation of Absolute Binding Free Energies.

Authors:  Rhys Evans; Ladislav Hovan; Gareth A Tribello; Benjamin P Cossins; Carolina Estarellas; Francesco L Gervasio
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 6.006

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.