Literature DB >> 30143917

Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.

Lin Frank Song1, Nupur Bansal1,2, Zheng Zheng1, Kenneth M Merz3,4.   

Abstract

Accurately predicting receptor-ligand binding free energies is one of the holy grails of computational chemistry with many applications in chemistry and biology. Many successes have been reported, but issues relating to sampling and force field accuracy remain significant issues affecting our ability to reliably calculate binding free energies. In order to explore these issues in more detail we have examined a series of small host-guest complexes from the SAMPL6 blind challenge, namely octa-acids (OAs)-guest complexes and Curcurbit[8]uril (CB8)-guest complexes. Specifically, potential of mean force studies using umbrella sampling combined with the weighted histogram method were carried out on both systems with both known and unknown binding affinities. We find that using standard force fields and straightforward simulation protocols we are able to obtain satisfactory results, but that simply scaling our results allows us to significantly improve our predictive ability for the unknown test sets: the overall RMSD of the binding free energy versus experiment is reduced from 5.59 to 2.36 kcal/mol; for the CB8 test system, the RMSD goes from 8.04 to 3.51 kcal/mol, while for the OAs test system, the RSMD goes from 2.89 to 0.95 kcal/mol. The scaling approach was inspired by studies on structurally related known benchmark sets: by simply scaling, the RMSD was reduced from 6.23 to 1.19 kcal/mol and from 2.96 to 0.62 kcal/mol for the CB8 benchmark system and the OA benchmark system, respectively. We find this scaling procedure to correct absolute binding affinities to be highly effective especially when working across a "congeneric" series with similar charge states. It is less successful when applied to mixed ligands with varied charges and chemical characteristics, but improvement is still realized in the present case. This approach suggests that there are large systematic errors in absolute binding free energy calculations that can be straightforwardly accounted for using a scaling procedure. Random errors are still an issue, but near chemical accuracy can be obtained using the present strategy in select cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absolute binding free energy; Host–guest; PMF; SAMPL6 challenge; Scaling procedure; Systematic and random error; Umbrella sampling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30143917     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-018-0153-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  80 in total

1.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  On the calculation of absolute macromolecular binding free energies.

Authors:  Hengbin Luo; Kim Sharp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Escaping free-energy minima.

Authors:  Alessandro Laio; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Thermodynamic stability of water molecules in the bacteriorhodopsin proton channel: a molecular dynamics free energy perturbation study.

Authors:  B Roux; M Nina; R Pomès; J C Smith
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  A simple assay for quality binders to cucurbiturils.

Authors:  Julián Vázquez; Patricia Remón; Roy N Dsouza; Alexandra I Lazar; Jesús F Arteaga; Werner M Nau; Uwe Pischel
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.236

8.  Calculation of relative binding free energy differences for fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase inhibitors using the thermodynamic cycle perturbation approach.

Authors:  M R Reddy; M D Erion
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-07-04       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 9.  Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better?

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael W Chiu; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 10.  The role of ABC transporters in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADME-Tox).

Authors:  Gergely Szakács; András Váradi; Csilla Ozvegy-Laczka; Balázs Sarkadi
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 7.851

View more
  8 in total

1.  SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinities and binding poses from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.

Authors:  Zhaoxi Sun; Qiaole He; Xiao Li; Zhengdan Zhu
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Binding Thermodynamics of Host-Guest Systems with SMIRNOFF99Frosst 1.0.5 from the Open Force Field Initiative.

Authors:  David R Slochower; Niel M Henriksen; Lee-Ping Wang; John D Chodera; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding affinities from extensive alchemical and end-point free energy calculations.

Authors:  Zhe Huai; Huaiyu Yang; Xiao Li; Zhaoxi Sun
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding poses and binding affinities from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.

Authors:  Zhaoxi Sun
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  SAMPL7 blind challenge: quantum-mechanical prediction of partition coefficients and acid dissociation constants for small drug-like molecules.

Authors:  Basak Koca Fındık; Zeynep Pinar Haslak; Evrim Arslan; Viktorya Aviyente
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Correction Schemes for Absolute Binding Free Energies Involving Lipid Bilayers.

Authors:  Zhiyi Wu; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 6.578

7.  Local Ion Densities can Influence Transition Paths of Molecular Binding.

Authors:  Nicole M Roussey; Alex Dickson
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-04-26

8.  Accurate Receptor-Ligand Binding Free Energies from Fast QM Conformational Chemical Space Sampling.

Authors:  Esra Boz; Matthias Stein
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.