Literature DB >> 23896298

Blind prediction of charged ligand binding affinities in a model binding site.

Gabriel J Rocklin1, Sarah E Boyce, Marcus Fischer, Inbar Fish, David L Mobley, Brian K Shoichet, Ken A Dill.   

Abstract

Predicting absolute protein-ligand binding affinities remains a frontier challenge in ligand discovery and design. This becomes more difficult when ionic interactions are involved because of the large opposing solvation and electrostatic attraction energies. In a blind test, we examined whether alchemical free-energy calculations could predict binding affinities of 14 charged and 5 neutral compounds previously untested as ligands for a cavity binding site in cytochrome c peroxidase. In this simplified site, polar and cationic ligands compete with solvent to interact with a buried aspartate. Predictions were tested by calorimetry, spectroscopy, and crystallography. Of the 15 compounds predicted to bind, 13 were experimentally confirmed, while 4 compounds were false negative predictions. Predictions had a root-mean-square error of 1.95 kcal/mol to the experimental affinities, and predicted poses had an average RMSD of 1.7Å to the crystallographic poses. This test serves as a benchmark for these thermodynamically rigorous calculations at predicting binding affinities for charged compounds and gives insights into the existing sources of error, which are primarily electrostatic interactions inside proteins. Our experiments also provide a useful set of ionic binding affinities in a simplified system for testing new affinity prediction methods.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCP; ESP; ITC; MSD; QM; RMSE; cytochrome c peroxidase; electrostatic potential; electrostatics; free-energy calculations; isothermal titration calorimetry; ligand binding; mean signed deviation; molecular dynamics; quantum mechanics; root-mean-square error

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23896298      PMCID: PMC3962782          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.07.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  51 in total

Review 1.  What are the dielectric "constants" of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models?

Authors:  C N Schutz; A Warshel
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-09-01

2.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 3.  Accounting for electronic polarization in non-polarizable force fields.

Authors:  Igor Leontyev; Alexei Stuchebrukhov
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.676

4.  Computation of methodology-independent ionic solvation free energies from molecular simulations. II. The hydration free energy of the sodium cation.

Authors:  Mika A Kastenholz; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

6.  GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit.

Authors:  Sander Pronk; Szilárd Páll; Roland Schulz; Per Larsson; Pär Bjelkmar; Rossen Apostolov; Michael R Shirts; Jeremy C Smith; Peter M Kasson; David van der Spoel; Berk Hess; Erik Lindahl
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Molecular dynamics studies on peroxidases: a structural model for horseradish peroxidase and a substrate adduct.

Authors:  L Banci; P Carloni; G G Savellini
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-10-18       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Modest stabilization by most hydrogen-bonded side-chain interactions in membrane proteins.

Authors:  Nathan Hyunjoong Joh; Andrew Min; Salem Faham; Julian P Whitelegge; Duan Yang; Virgil L Woods; James U Bowie
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Localized thermodynamic coupling between hydrogen bonding and microenvironment polarity substantially stabilizes proteins.

Authors:  Jianmin Gao; Daryl A Bosco; Evan T Powers; Jeffery W Kelly
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  The impact of introducing a histidine into an apolar cavity site on docking and ligand recognition.

Authors:  Matthew Merski; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  21 in total

1.  Calculating the binding free energies of charged species based on explicit-solvent simulations employing lattice-sum methods: an accurate correction scheme for electrostatic finite-size effects.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; David L Mobley; Ken A Dill; Philippe H Hünenberger
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Resolving the Ligand-Binding Specificity in c-MYC G-Quadruplex DNA: Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations and SPR Experiment.

Authors:  Nanjie Deng; Lauren Wickstrom; Piotr Cieplak; Clement Lin; Danzhou Yang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 3.  Docking Screens for Novel Ligands Conferring New Biology.

Authors:  John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Fragment Pose Prediction Using Non-equilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Nathan M Lim; Meghan Osato; Gregory L Warren; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Calculating the sensitivity and robustness of binding free energy calculations to force field parameters.

Authors:  Gabriel J Rocklin; David L Mobley; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  A Python tool to set up relative free energy calculations in GROMACS.

Authors:  Pavel V Klimovich; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Testing inhomogeneous solvation theory in structure-based ligand discovery.

Authors:  Trent E Balius; Marcus Fischer; Reed M Stein; Thomas B Adler; Crystal N Nguyen; Anthony Cruz; Michael K Gilson; Tom Kurtzman; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Multiple binding modes of ibuprofen in human serum albumin identified by absolute binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Stefania Evoli; David L Mobley; Rita Guzzi; Bruno Rizzuti
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.676

9.  Escaping Atom Types in Force Fields Using Direct Chemical Perception.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Caitlin C Bannan; Andrea Rizzi; Christopher I Bayly; John D Chodera; Victoria T Lim; Nathan M Lim; Kyle A Beauchamp; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael K Gilson; Peter K Eastman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 10.  Advances in free-energy-based simulations of protein folding and ligand binding.

Authors:  Alberto Perez; Joseph A Morrone; Carlos Simmerling; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 6.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.